Quoting Zhao Zhili (2024-03-26 03:30:21)
> Ping. Is it OK to apply the patch as it is?
Fine with me.
--
Anton Khirnov
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link abo
Ping. Is it OK to apply the patch as it is?
> On Mar 23, 2024, at 06:36, Jan Ekström wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 10:18 PM Anton Khirnov wrote:
>>
>> Quoting Zhao Zhili (2024-03-22 13:43:43)
>>> From: Zhao Zhili
>>>
>>> The test depends on the compile option of x265. It failed when
>>>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 10:18 PM Anton Khirnov wrote:
>
> Quoting Zhao Zhili (2024-03-22 13:43:43)
> > From: Zhao Zhili
> >
> > The test depends on the compile option of x265. It failed when
> > HIGH_BIT_DEPTH isn't enabled. It also failed when asan is enabled
> > because of memory issue inside o
Quoting Zhao Zhili (2024-03-22 13:43:43)
> From: Zhao Zhili
>
> The test depends on the compile option of x265. It failed when
> HIGH_BIT_DEPTH isn't enabled. It also failed when asan is enabled
> because of memory issue inside of x265, which I don't think can
> be fixed within FFmpeg.
I suggest
From: Zhao Zhili
The test depends on the compile option of x265. It failed when
HIGH_BIT_DEPTH isn't enabled. It also failed when asan is enabled
because of memory issue inside of x265, which I don't think can
be fixed within FFmpeg.
---
tests/fate/enc_external.mak | 5 -
tests/ref/fate/li
