On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 20:31:00 +0100
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 06:31:02PM +0100, wm4 wrote:
> > Channel layouts are essentially uint64_t, and every value is valid.
> > ---
> > libswresample/options.c | 8
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 20:31:00 +0100
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 06:31:02PM +0100, wm4 wrote:
> > Channel layouts are essentially uint64_t, and every value is valid.
> > ---
> > libswresample/options.c | 8
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 06:31:02PM +0100, wm4 wrote:
> Channel layouts are essentially uint64_t, and every value is valid.
> ---
> libswresample/options.c | 8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
this LGTM if no unsiged int64 support is added to avoptions
[...]
--
Michael
On 10/25/2015 5:31 PM, wm4 wrote:
> Channel layouts are essentially uint64_t, and every value is valid.
> ---
> libswresample/options.c | 8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Probably needs a micro version bump.
- Derek
___
ffm
Channel layouts are essentially uint64_t, and every value is valid.
---
libswresample/options.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libswresample/options.c b/libswresample/options.c
index 0bcb102..2bf8ab1 100644
--- a/libswresample/options.c
+++ b/libswresam