On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 13:25:45 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> On 12/25/2017 2:53 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> > diff --git a/libavresample/avresample.h b/libavresample/avresample.h
> > index 193443e2a6..57889c572c 100644
> > --- a/libavresample/avresample.h
> > +++ b/libavresample/avresample.h
> >
On 12/25/2017 2:53 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> diff --git a/libavresample/avresample.h b/libavresample/avresample.h
> index 193443e2a6..57889c572c 100644
> --- a/libavresample/avresample.h
> +++ b/libavresample/avresample.h
> @@ -103,10 +103,10 @@
>
> #define AVRESAMPLE_MAX_CHANNELS 32
>
On 12/25/2017 5:53 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> Deprecate the entire library. Merged years ago to provide compatibility
> with Libav, it remained unmaintained by the FFmpeg project and duplicated
> functionality provided by libswresample.
>
> In order to improve consistency and reduce attack
On 26 December 2017 at 16:57, Derek Buitenhuis
wrote:
> On 12/26/2017 4:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> > You didn't even bother to read the patch? Your objections have been
> > addressed.
> > Since your new objection is invalid, I still intent to push it.
>
> I said wording, which others ha
On 12/26/2017 5:03 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Derek Buitenhuis (2017-12-26):
>> It would be nice if this community moved away from the "aggressive asshole"
>> style of development, as seen here, but after so many years, that just
>> seems impossible. Normal people get pushed away by aggressive ass
Derek Buitenhuis (2017-12-26):
> It would be nice if this community moved away from the "aggressive asshole"
> style of development, as seen here, but after so many years, that just
> seems impossible. Normal people get pushed away by aggressive assholes.
I agree on the idea. Maybe start by not ca
On 12/26/2017 4:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> You didn't even bother to read the patch? Your objections have been
> addressed.
> Since your new objection is invalid, I still intent to push it.
I said wording, which others had issues with, and were *not* addressed until
v2 of the patch yeste
On 12/26/2017 1:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> On 26 December 2017 at 16:35, Derek Buitenhuis
> wrote:
>
>> On 12/26/2017 4:10 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
>>> I missed that. If the proposal was similar enough to what was sent
>>> yesterday, then my objection does not stand, of course, sorry.
On 26 December 2017 at 16:35, Derek Buitenhuis
wrote:
> On 12/26/2017 4:10 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> > I missed that. If the proposal was similar enough to what was sent
> > yesterday, then my objection does not stand, of course, sorry.
>
> The version on the ML then was different, and it never
On 12/26/2017 4:10 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> I missed that. If the proposal was similar enough to what was sent
> yesterday, then my objection does not stand, of course, sorry.
The version on the ML then was different, and it never reached consensus at
all on wording. I object for the reasons st
On 12/26/2017 3:54 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> This has been on the ML for over a month. No one disagreed then. No one was
> on vacation then.
I agree with Nicholas, sending a new, different version of a patch, *on
Christmas Day*,
and pushing on Boxing Day if nobody has objections, is not O
Rostislav Pehlivanov (2017-12-26):
> This has been on the ML for over a month. No one disagreed then. No one was
> on vacation then.
I missed that. If the proposal was similar enough to what was sent
yesterday, then my objection does not stand, of course, sorry.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
s
On 26 December 2017 at 15:47, Nicolas George wrote:
> Rostislav Pehlivanov (2017-12-26):
> > I'll push this tonight if there are no more objections.
>
> Way too soon. For a patch that sensitive, leaving a week for people to
> voice their concerns and raise objections that you may not have thought
Rostislav Pehlivanov (2017-12-26):
> I'll push this tonight if there are no more objections.
Way too soon. For a patch that sensitive, leaving a week for people to
voice their concerns and raise objections that you may not have thought
of seems like a reasonable minimum. Plus we are on vacation pe
On 25 December 2017 at 17:53, Rostislav Pehlivanov
wrote:
> Deprecate the entire library. Merged years ago to provide compatibility
> with Libav, it remained unmaintained by the FFmpeg project and duplicated
> functionality provided by libswresample.
>
> In order to improve consistency and reduce
Deprecate the entire library. Merged years ago to provide compatibility
with Libav, it remained unmaintained by the FFmpeg project and duplicated
functionality provided by libswresample.
In order to improve consistency and reduce attack surface, as well as to ease
burden on maintainers, it has bee
On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 11:57:31AM +, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
[...]
> > What you call "dead project" did basically all of the hardware
> > transcoding improvements that were merged into ffmpeg. How very
> > insincere of you.
> >
>
> Didn't mean dead as an offense, just as an honest fact. H
On 25 December 2017 at 11:03, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 10:44:40 +
> Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
>
> > On 25 December 2017 at 06:50, wm4 wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 02:12:38 +
> > > Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> > > > -
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 10:44:40 +
Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> On 25 December 2017 at 06:50, wm4 wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 02:12:38 +
> > Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> > > ---
> > > doc/APIchanges | 5 +
> > > liba
On 25 December 2017 at 06:50, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 02:12:38 +
> Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> > ---
> > doc/APIchanges | 5 +
> > libavresample/avresample.h | 30 +-
> > 2 files changed, 30 i
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 02:12:38 +
Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> ---
> doc/APIchanges | 5 +
> libavresample/avresample.h | 30 +-
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/APIchan
Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
---
doc/APIchanges | 5 +
libavresample/avresample.h | 30 +-
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/APIchanges b/doc/APIchanges
index df79758e86..96fad416d5 100644
--- a/doc/APIchanges
+
On 25.11.2017 18:31, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
On 11/25/2017 2:40 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
Maybe "libavresample is not maintained by the FFmpeg project and will be
dropped at the next major bump. Please use libswresample instead."
And it probably needs a longer explanation somewhere (website/news
On 11/25/2017 2:40 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> Maybe "libavresample is not maintained by the FFmpeg project and will be
> dropped at the next major bump. Please use libswresample instead."
>
> And it probably needs a longer explanation somewhere (website/news/...)
All API functions should be prope
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:58:16PM +, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/libavresample/utils.c b/libavresample/utils.c
> index b4fb906556..3e629fe901 100644
> --- a/libavresample/utils.c
> +++ b/libavresample/utils.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ int avresample_open(AVAudioResampleContext *
On 17 November 2017 at 17:53, James Almer wrote:
> On 11/17/2017 12:58 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> > ---
> > doc/APIchanges| 5 +
> > libavresample/utils.c | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/APIchanges
On 17 November 2017 at 17:51, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-11-17 16:58 GMT+01:00 Rostislav Pehlivanov :
>
> > +2017-xx-xx - xxx - lavr 4.0.0 - avresample.h
> > + Deprecate the entire library. It was unmaintained and redundant
> > + as libswresample did everything it did better, faster, wi
On 11/17/2017 12:58 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> ---
> doc/APIchanges| 5 +
> libavresample/utils.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/APIchanges b/doc/APIchanges
> index d336f6ce22..22c7b5a0d0 100644
> --- a/do
2017-11-17 16:58 GMT+01:00 Rostislav Pehlivanov :
> +2017-xx-xx - xxx - lavr 4.0.0 - avresample.h
> + Deprecate the entire library. It was unmaintained and redundant
> + as libswresample did everything it did better, faster, with more
> + control and with a better, slightly higher level API
Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
---
doc/APIchanges| 5 +
libavresample/utils.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/APIchanges b/doc/APIchanges
index d336f6ce22..22c7b5a0d0 100644
--- a/doc/APIchanges
+++ b/doc/APIchanges
@@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ libavutil: 20
30 matches
Mail list logo
