On Thu, Apr 30, 2020, at 11:00 AM, Lou Logan wrote:
> doc/encoders.texi | 6 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
Pushed.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsub
On Fri, May 1, 2020, at 6:56 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>
> Is it not true that the encoder implements more options, profiles and
> samplerates?
ffaacenc has 1 additional AVoption compared to libfdk_aac; if that
means anything.
ffaacenc supports 1 additional sample rate (7350) compared to
li
Jean-Baptiste Kempf (12020-05-01):
> Is it not true that the encoder implements more options, profiles and
> samplerates?
But even if it is true, does it belong in the introductory part of the
documentation? The many options will be visible in the list of options
anyway. This paragraph looks more
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020, at 21:00, Lou Logan wrote:
> -This encoder is the default AAC encoder, natively implemented into FFmpeg.
> Its
> -quality is on par or better than libfdk_aac at the default bitrate of
> 128kbps.
> -This encoder also implements more options, profiles and samplerates than
> -o
On 01-05-2020 12:30 am, Lou Logan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Lou Logan
---
After this claim was made in e34e3619a2b kamedo2 did in-depth ABX
testing comparing these encoders:
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php?topic=111085.0
Result: FFmpeg AAC wasn't as good as libfdk_aac on average.
I know some t
Signed-off-by: Lou Logan
---
After this claim was made in e34e3619a2b kamedo2 did in-depth ABX
testing comparing these encoders:
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php?topic=111085.0
Result: FFmpeg AAC wasn't as good as libfdk_aac on average.
I know some things have changed since then, "use the fast
