Signed-off-by: Lou Logan <l...@lrcd.com> --- After this claim was made in e34e3619a2b kamedo2 did in-depth ABX testing comparing these encoders:
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php?topic=111085.0 Result: FFmpeg AAC wasn't as good as libfdk_aac on average. I know some things have changed since then, "use the fast coder as the default" (fcb681ac) for example, so maybe the situation is different now. However, I am unaware of any recent comparison. So without any substantiation we shouldn't make such a blantant claim. --- doc/encoders.texi | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/encoders.texi b/doc/encoders.texi index 18bfe8f2eb..f987e88f30 100644 --- a/doc/encoders.texi +++ b/doc/encoders.texi @@ -30,11 +30,7 @@ follows. Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) encoder. -This encoder is the default AAC encoder, natively implemented into FFmpeg. Its -quality is on par or better than libfdk_aac at the default bitrate of 128kbps. -This encoder also implements more options, profiles and samplerates than -other encoders (with only the AAC-HE profile pending to be implemented) so this -encoder has become the default and is the recommended choice. +This encoder is the default AAC encoder, natively implemented into FFmpeg. @subsection Options -- 2.26.0 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
