James Almer gmail.com> writes:
> On 9/14/2015 7:49 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > But nobody wants to send a patch with an updated
> > commit message afaict.
>
> How is that important?
Afaiu, it is the only objection that was raised.
(But I am not a native speaker and may of course
have misu
Michael Niedermayer gmx.at> writes:
> > > that said, the patches are fine, the bugs are just in cases that
> > > the there exist unanimous consent that they should be dropped
> >
> > Second patch attached that fixes ticket #2089 for me.
Only the container bitrate is fixed now, patch for
codec
On 9/14/2015 7:49 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> But nobody wants to send a patch with an updated commit message afaict.
How is that important? If you're talking about stating somewhere that
we're dropping ABI compatibility then the correct place is changelog,
RELEASE_NOTES and/or APIChanges, not a
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:49:31AM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> On Monday 14 September 2015 04:31:56 pm Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 01:16:34AM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > > On Monday 14 September 2015 12:48:27 am Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > the entries i
On Monday 14 September 2015 04:31:56 pm Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 01:16:34AM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > On Monday 14 September 2015 12:48:27 am Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > the entries in avcodec_options are wrong
> >
> > New patch attached.
>
> [...]
>
> > di
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 01:16:34AM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> On Monday 14 September 2015 12:48:27 am Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > the entries in avcodec_options are wrong
>
> New patch attached.
[...]
> diff --git a/libavcodec/options_table.h b/libavcodec/options_table.h
> index d6a5c69
On Monday 14 September 2015 12:48:27 am Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> the entries in avcodec_options are wrong
New patch attached.
Thank you, Carl Eugen
diff --git a/doc/APIchanges b/doc/APIchanges
index 958035c..415463a 100644
--- a/doc/APIchanges
+++ b/doc/APIchanges
@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ libavutil
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 11:19:00PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> On Sunday 13 September 2015 12:30:20 am Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:52:42PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Attached is a new patch that should be ready to be applied
> > > no mat
On Sunday 13 September 2015 12:30:20 am Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:52:42PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Attached is a new patch that should be ready to be applied
> > no matter if we drop compatibility or not.
> >
> > Please comment (quickly if possib
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:52:42PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Attached is a new patch that should be ready to be applied no matter if we
> drop compatibility or not.
>
> Please comment (quickly if possible), Carl Eugen
i think there are a few changes missing:
libavcodec/cook.c: I
Hi!
Attached is a new patch that should be ready to be applied no matter if we
drop compatibility or not.
Please comment (quickly if possible), Carl Eugen
diff --git a/doc/APIchanges b/doc/APIchanges
index 958035c..415463a 100644
--- a/doc/APIchanges
+++ b/doc/APIchanges
@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ libav
Michael Niedermayer gmx.at> writes:
> This would break the fork ABI compatibility option
> and theres a IRC meeting sheduled on saturday to
> discuss the "ABI compatibility policy"
>
> I wont apply this before the meeting, that would
> be kind of wrong
You could apply it with "#if INCOMPATIB
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:46:42AM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer gmx.at> writes:
>
> > a 32bit bitrate is insufficient for high resolution,
> > high framerate material an example would be rawvideo
>
> Ping?
This would break the fork ABI compatibility option and theres a
Michael Niedermayer gmx.at> writes:
> a 32bit bitrate is insufficient for high resolution,
> high framerate material an example would be rawvideo
Ping?
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listin
Michael Niedermayer gmx.at> writes:
> a 32bit bitrate is insufficient for high resolution,
> high framerate material an example would be rawvideo
Please mention ticket #2089 if it is fixed by this commit.
Thanks, Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:06:43 -0700
Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:57 PM, wm4 wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:49:41 -0400
> > "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:06:43 -0700
Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:57 PM, wm4 wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:49:41 -0400
> > "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at
Hi Ganesh,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:57 PM, wm4 wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:49:41 -0400
> > "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:57 PM, wm4 wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:49:41 -0400
> "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> > wrote:
>> > > From: Michael Niedermayer
>> > >
>>
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:49:41 -0400
"Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> > > From: Michael Niedermayer
> > >
> > > a 32bit bitrate is insufficient for high resolution
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 22:20:40 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> From: Michael Niedermayer
>
> a 32bit bitrate is insufficient for high resolution, high framerate material
> an example would be rawvideo
>
> Not all changes are covered by #if as its easier to just push when the
> bump is done in
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:47:07PM -0700, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > From: Michael Niedermayer
> >
> > a 32bit bitrate is insufficient for high resolution, high framerate material
> > an example would be rawvideo
> >
> > Not all chan
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > From: Michael Niedermayer
> >
> > a 32bit bitrate is insufficient for high resolution, high framerate
> material
> > an example would be rawvideo
> >
> > Not all cha
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> From: Michael Niedermayer
>
> a 32bit bitrate is insufficient for high resolution, high framerate material
> an example would be rawvideo
>
> Not all changes are covered by #if as its easier to just push when the
> bump is done instead
From: Michael Niedermayer
a 32bit bitrate is insufficient for high resolution, high framerate material
an example would be rawvideo
Not all changes are covered by #if as its easier to just push when the
bump is done instead of making it coditional and removig the conditionallity
again
Signed-o
25 matches
Mail list logo
