James Almer <jamrial <at> gmail.com> writes: > On 9/14/2015 7:49 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > But nobody wants to send a patch with an updated > > commit message afaict. > > How is that important?
Afaiu, it is the only objection that was raised. (But I am not a native speaker and may of course have misunderstood and / or missed something) > If you're talking about stating somewhere that > we're dropping ABI compatibility then the > correct place is changelog, RELEASE_NOTES and/or > APIChanges I don't think patches for any of those were sent but I may have missed them. > not a random commit message. I use git blame very often and don't find any commit message "random". > This patch can go in as is, but it would be > preferable if you just drop the incompatible > abi check and simply make the fields 64bits. I suggested this twice iirc and it was rejected so I wanted to produce some progress within a reasonable (?) timeframe since the version bump. Thank you, Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
