Am 24.02.15 um 11:32 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
> Thilo Borgmann mail.de> writes:
>
>> You just misread me, I know what the first patch is for
>> - which is what you just wrote. However, my question
>> was about reason for the second "#define" patch.
>
> My comment was only about the second pat
Thilo Borgmann mail.de> writes:
> You just misread me, I know what the first patch is for
> - which is what you just wrote. However, my question
> was about reason for the second "#define" patch.
My comment was only about the second patch.
Is the second patch ok?
Carl Eugen
Am 23.02.15 um 19:46 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
> Thilo Borgmann mail.de> writes:
>
>> For the second, what is that patch needed for?
>
> It is meant to fix warnings when compiling avfoundation
> for ios, see for example:
> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=20150223010210&log=compile&slot=aarc
> Attached patches fix different warnings when compiling
> libavdevice/avfoundation.o
> The first silences C90 warnings about mixed declaration
> and functions when using gcc, the second silences many
> "undefined" warnings when compiling for ios.
First patch ok if tested.
For the second, wha
Hi!
Attached patches fix different warnings when compiling
libavdevice/avfoundation.o
The first silences C90 warnings about mixed declaration
and functions when using gcc, the second silences many
"undefined" warnings when compiling for ios.
Please comment, Carl Eugen
diff --git a/libavdevice/
