Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] libpostproc splitout

On 11/26/2024 6:25 AM, Nicolas George wrote: Jean-Baptiste Kempf (12024-11-26): Once again you attack people directly on threads. « your kind of » ≠ « you », please do not abuse code of conduct rules to silence discourse that you want to silence. It is part of the kind of governance that is ha

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Discussion about mails from 9 years ago Was: [PATCH 1/2] doc/community: Add a standard set of rules for software development mailing lists

Hi all, On 11/24/2024 1:49 PM, James Almer wrote: On 11/24/2024 6:24 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 06:02:55PM -0300, James Almer wrote: On 11/24/2024 5:43 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 04:11:42PM -0300, James Almer wrote: On 11/24/202

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] root access voting

On 11/2/2024 4:34 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi At teh current videolan developer days there where several surprise votes on FFmpegs infractructure. And to the best of my knowledge no remote participation and no recording. So let me try to reply to the idea of the general assembly choosi

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] 7.0 Name

On 4/3/2024 6:42 AM, Niklas Haas wrote: On Mon, 01 Apr 2024 19:42:29 -0400 Sean McGovern wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 1, 2024, 18:00 Lynne wrote: Apr 1, 2024, 22:01 bymich...@niedermayer.cc: Hi all I think we didnt decide on a name for 7.0 yet Previously suggested names: Darwin, De broglie,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 6.0

On 2/21/2023 4:31 AM, Kieran Kunhya wrote: On Tue, 21 Feb 2023, 11:38 Michael Niedermayer, wrote: On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 06:47:03PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi all i plan to branch off release/6.0 from master in the next days If theres something blocking and i should wait, please

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/3] avformat/flv: add support for h265 streams

On 7/1/2021 9:23 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: On Thu, 1 Jul 2021, at 18:15, James Almer wrote: Is there an official source for these numbers? Apparently no. Neither does REALH263 or MPEG4 as far as i can see. But if there are files out there that can be demuxed with this change, as long as

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/3] avformat/flv: add support for h265 streams

On 7/1/2021 9:15 AM, James Almer wrote: On 7/1/2021 11:41 AM, James Almer wrote: On 7/1/2021 11:27 AM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: James Almer: From: Matthieu Patou Suggested-by: ffm...@fb.com Signed-off-by: James Almer ---   libavformat/flv.h    |  1 +   libavformat/flvdec.c | 14 ++

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] 4.4 Release Name

On 4/3/2021 12:47 PM, Kieran Kunhya wrote: Who are you and what on earth are you talking about? Why on earth is it appropriate to name an ffmpeg release after a disease that has killed millions? Kieran Sent from my mobile device Is it appropriate to make sport shoes with human blood? __

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] 4.4 Release Name

On 4/3/2021 8:11 AM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: On 03/04/2021 11:19, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: This is Internet and social networks in 2021. It WILL be taken in the wrong way. Do NOT use anything political or related to the news in naming. Never Ever. It might be badly taken, but mostly you hav

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] 4.4 Release Name

On 4/3/2021 6:02 AM, Lynne wrote: Apr 3, 2021, 12:19 by j...@videolan.org: On Sat, 3 Apr 2021, at 11:50, Zane van Iperen wrote: Personally no, I prefer "plandemic" for reasons given previously. However, Michael is right in saying that it could be taken the wrong way. This is Internet and

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] 4.4 Release Name

On 4/2/2021 2:59 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi all We still need to choose the name for 4.4 previous unused suggestions where: Von Neumann, Lorentz, Poincaré, Desitter, De Broglie, Gauss, Galois, Viterbi, Darwin Feel free to reply with name suggestions If theres a tie then i will randomly

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] Add RTMFP support with librtmfp library

On 9/23/2019 2:34 AM, live-school support wrote: Thomas Jammet Mon, 10 Jun 2019 05:51:05 -0700 Hi all, In attachmen

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 4.2

On 21-05-2019 12:09 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi Its quite some time since 4.1 so its probably getting time to branch 4.2. If there are any bugs you want fixed in 4.2 its probably a good idea to fix them soon. Are there any suggestions for a name ? If not ill pick something from unused