On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 22:35:12 +1100
Matt Oliver wrote:
> Well perhaps making a tls_libressl implementation would be the better
> way to go as the APIs are only going to diverge further. So perhaps
> in order to support LibreSSL there should be a separate
> implementation using LibreSSLs independen
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 14:07:45 +0100
wm4 wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 13:01:54 +
> Mark Thompson wrote:
>
> > On 28/01/17 11:28, wm4 wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:53:50 +
> > > Mark Thompson wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 27/
o existing #if macros.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Behun
> > ---
> > libavformat/tls_openssl.c | 12 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libavformat/tls_openssl.c b/libavformat/tls_openssl.c
> &
