On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 22:35:12 +1100 Matt Oliver <protogo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well perhaps making a tls_libressl implementation would be the better > way to go as the APIs are only going to diverge further. So perhaps > in order to support LibreSSL there should be a separate > implementation using LibreSSLs independent libtls instead of the > older openssl support interface. libtls is the recommended and > primarily supported interface when using LibreSSL so that should be > used going forward instead of further complication the opensll code. Yes, that would be the optimal solution, I think. But still, even if not considering LibreSSL, the currently proposed patch is probably a better way to check for BIO_meth_* calls in OpenSSL. That it also works with LibreSSL can be considered as a bonus. Maybe the commit message should be changed. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
