On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 03:06:28PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> On 23/05/10 14:59, Anders Logg wrote:
> >On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 03:32:51PM +0200, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> >>On 23 May 2010 15:08, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On 23/05/10 13:58, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
>
> >>
On 23/05/10 14:59, Anders Logg wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 03:32:51PM +0200, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
On 23 May 2010 15:08, Garth N. Wells wrote:
On 23/05/10 13:58, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
On 23 May 2010 12:51, Kristian Oelgaardwrote:
On 23 May 2010 12:14, Garth N. Wellswro
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 03:32:51PM +0200, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> On 23 May 2010 15:08, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 23/05/10 13:58, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> >>
> >> On 23 May 2010 12:51, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 23 May 2010 12:14, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
On 23 May 2010 15:08, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> On 23/05/10 13:58, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
>>
>> On 23 May 2010 12:51, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
>>>
>>> On 23 May 2010 12:14, Garth N. Wells wrote:
Where are we at with attaching data to integrals? The quadrature order
can
be
On 23/05/10 13:58, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
On 23 May 2010 12:51, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
On 23 May 2010 12:14, Garth N. Wells wrote:
Where are we at with attaching data to integrals? The quadrature order can
be attached, but I's like to do:
dS({"representation": "tensor"})
Is this s
On 23 May 2010 12:51, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> On 23 May 2010 12:14, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>> Where are we at with attaching data to integrals? The quadrature order can
>> be attached, but I's like to do:
>>
>> dS({"representation": "tensor"})
>>
>> Is this supported by FFC?
It looks like t
On 23 May 2010 12:14, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> Where are we at with attaching data to integrals? The quadrature order can
> be attached, but I's like to do:
>
> dS({"representation": "tensor"})
>
> Is this supported by FFC?
I'm quite sure that it was supported before we redesigned FFC, so it
sh
7 matches
Mail list logo