On 23/05/10 13:58, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
On 23 May 2010 12:51, Kristian Oelgaard<k.b.oelga...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 23 May 2010 12:14, Garth N. Wells<gn...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
Where are we at with attaching data to integrals? The quadrature order can
be attached, but I's like to do:
dS({"representation": "tensor"})
Is this supported by FFC?
It looks like this is already supported in FFC.
Note that the representation must be the same on each subdomain (this
is also a requirement for quadrature_degree).
dS(0, {"representation": "tensor"}) + dS(0, {"representation": "quadrature"})
is not possible, but
dS(1, {"representation": "tensor"}) + dS(0, {"representation": "quadrature"})
OK.
dS(0, {"representation": "tensor"}) \
+ dS(0, {"representation": "tensor"})
works, but
dS({"representation": "tensor"}) \
+ dS({"representation": "tensor"})
doesn't. Seems like a bug.
Turns out I can't use this anyway because facet normals are not
supported by FFC with the tensor representation,
ffc.tensor.monomialextraction.MonomialException: No handler defined
for terminal FacetNormal
Garth
is.
Also note that metadata overrides command line options.
Kristian
I'm quite sure that it was supported before we redesigned FFC, so it
should be possible to add back
although I currently don't have an overview of how difficult it will
be (probably relatively easy).
Kristian
Garth
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc
Post to : ffc@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc
Post to : ffc@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
