Hi, Reference:
> From: Dave Close
> Reply-to: Discussion list for EXMH users
> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 16:58:16 -0700
Dave Close wrote:
> When I use Bcc with exmh, the recipient receives a *text* copy of my
> entire message -- including all headers, MIME parts, and attachments
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 11:13:58 +0700, Robert Elz said:
> ps: yes, today, it would be better if the default encapsulation was
> MIME, rather than old style digest, few MUA's these days can deal with
> digests.
>
> pps: Valdis: none of this has anything at all to do with exmh
Actually, you just droppe
I wrote:
> When I use Bcc with exmh, the recipient receives a *text* copy of my
> entire message -- including all headers, MIME parts, and attachments.
> Most are completely dumbfounded by this and unable to make sense of
> the message. I would think that the only difference that should occur
> be
Date:Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:41:16 -0400
From:Ken Hornstein
Message-ID: <20200412004120.97b94b3...@pb-smtp21.pobox.com>
| For reasons I am NOT completely clear on, the authors of MH decided
| a long time ago that sending what the rest of the world knows as a
| Bcc
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 16:58:16 -0700, Dave Close said:
> When I use Bcc with exmh, the recipient receives a *text* copy of my
> entire message -- including all headers, MIME parts, and attachments.
> Most are completely dumbfounded by this and unable to make sense of
> the message.
I'm not surprised
>When I use Bcc with exmh, the recipient receives a *text* copy of my
>entire message -- including all headers, MIME parts, and attachments.
>Most are completely dumbfounded by this and unable to make sense of
>the message. I would think that the only difference that should occur
>between a Bcc and
