Re: mailto: with Body part broken (was: Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution)

2005-11-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 23:41 +0100, guenther wrote: > > > > I can't say that Evo's behaviour is strictly wrong, since all it's doing > > > > is what Firefox is telling it, i.e. create a message with a given Body. > > > > The Evo developers could argue that adding an extra line in Normal > > > > form

Re: mailto: with Body part broken (was: Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution)

2005-11-16 Thread guenther
> > > I can't say that Evo's behaviour is strictly wrong, since all it's doing > > > is what Firefox is telling it, i.e. create a message with a given Body. > > > The Evo developers could argue that adding an extra line in Normal > > > format is exceeding the spec. > > > > It would be nothing mor

Re: mailto: with Body part broken (was: Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution)

2005-11-13 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 02:50 +0100, guenther wrote: > > I can't say that Evo's behaviour is strictly wrong, since all it's doing > > is what Firefox is telling it, i.e. create a message with a given Body. > > The Evo developers could argue that adding an extra line in Normal > > format is exceeding

Re: mailto: with Body part broken (was: Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution)

2005-11-12 Thread guenther
> > I never used this before, so I just had a look. You are right, this link > > is on a line with Preformat style, which probably is a good idea for > > this line. Anyway, that's about it where the behavior is good. Anything > > else is broken. > > > > a) There is only this line. There should be

Re: mailto: with Body part broken (was: Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution)

2005-11-12 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 00:53 +0100, guenther wrote: > > > I believe most people don't use it, cause they aren't used to it, forget > > > about it or just don't care. I even have seen folks not using the > > > Preformat style, after I explicitly pointed it out -- sending yet > > > another mail with a

mailto: with Body part broken (was: Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution)

2005-11-12 Thread guenther
> > I believe most people don't use it, cause they aren't used to it, forget > > about it or just don't care. I even have seen folks not using the > > Preformat style, after I explicitly pointed it out -- sending yet > > another mail with a note stating it is meant to be in a single line... > > M

Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution

2005-11-12 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 00:04 +0100, guenther wrote: > I believe most people don't use it, cause they aren't used to it, > forget > about it or just don't care. I even have seen folks not using the > Preformat style, after I explicitly pointed it out -- sending yet > another mail with a note stating

Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution

2005-11-12 Thread guenther
> > The Paragraph Style and indentation for example do work with plain text > > format as well. In fact, the Paragraph Style is pretty useful when > > pasting long lines, that really should be displayed in one single line. > > Like not breaking long links, commands and stuff. > > > > Sadly, most

Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution

2005-11-12 Thread guenther
> > > > 2. is it possible to get rid of the HTML formatting toolbar in the > > > > compose window? I write emails in plain text only, and would like to get > > > > rid of this toolbar. > > > > > > Well, It just gets disabled. If Get Rid means not visible which i > > > presume i what you meant the

Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution

2005-11-12 Thread Shreyas Srinivasan
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 19:12 +0100, guenther wrote: > The Paragraph Style and indentation for example do work with plain text > format as well. In fact, the Paragraph Style is pretty useful when > pasting long lines, that really should be displayed in one single line. > Like not breaking long links,

Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution

2005-11-12 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 19:12 +0100, guenther wrote: > > > 2. is it possible to get rid of the HTML formatting toolbar in the > > > compose window? I write emails in plain text only, and would like to get > > > rid of this toolbar. > > > > Well, It just gets disabled. If Get Rid means not visible wh

Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution

2005-11-12 Thread guenther
> > 2. is it possible to get rid of the HTML formatting toolbar in the > > compose window? I write emails in plain text only, and would like to get > > rid of this toolbar. > > Well, It just gets disabled. If Get Rid means not visible which i > presume i what you meant then no. "Getting rid of i

Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution

2005-11-08 Thread Shreyas Sriniavasan
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 14:27 +0100, Nicolas Chevreux wrote: > Hello, > > I am pretty new at using Evolution, and have three small questions > related to this program's ease of use: > > 1. is there a way to have a default signature automatically added to my > email? I would press "new message", and

Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution

2005-11-07 Thread Parthasarathi Susarla
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 14:27 +0100, Nicolas Chevreux wrote: > Hello, > > I am pretty new at using Evolution, and have three small questions > related to this program's ease of use: > > 1. is there a way to have a default signature automatically added to my > email? I would press "new message", and