[Fixing the vague subject line]
On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 08:52 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Why does my last mail from the mailing list contain a "Reply-To"
> header
Because dmarc_moderation_action is set to "Munge From" which "applies
the from_is_list Munge From transformation to these messages."
On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 09:22 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> that's how the server admins have it set (I mean the GNOME server admins, not
> the respective mailing list admins).
"Group-Reply" of Evolution does work, but as already pointed out, some
MUAs follow another approach. This d
On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 08:52 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> Why does my last mail from the mailing list contain a "Reply-To"
> header
> that could break mailing list replies for some MUAs?
>
> It's not an account setting.
>
>
> Subject: Re: [Evolution] Un-needed button
> ...
Hello Ralf,
Fedora 18 ships with Evo 3.6.4.
This combination is very stable for me. The only crashes I have are when
Evolution is open for 6 or more weeks. I receive a lot of e-mail and
restarting Evolution is required after a couple of weeks. Otherwise the
mail client works well for me.
HTH
Th
.
After this action, the Reply to Sender works like expected: only the
person in the To-field is being replied to.
-Original Message-
From: Patryk Benderz
Reply-to: patryk.bend...@esp.pl
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] "Reply to Sender" does same thing as &q
: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] "Reply to Sender" does same thing as "Reply to
All"
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:30:05 +0100
[cut]
> mail (and not to all people that are in To or Cc), evolution creates a
> reply message, but still includes all people in
[cut]
> mail (and not to all people that are in To or Cc), evolution creates a
> reply message, but still includes all people in the Cc field that are
[cut]
I am on 13.10 too, and when I hit ^R there comes a pop-up window that
asks me if I really want to sent to sender only or to all recipients.
Th
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 13:37 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 13:21 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 12:46 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > However, Evolution does change it's behaviour with each upgrade to
> > > current stable versions of it's dependencies fr
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 13:21 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 12:46 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > However, Evolution does change it's behaviour with each upgrade to
> > current stable versions of it's dependencies from upstream
>
> Either stop spreading FUD, or be way more exact
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 12:46 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> However, Evolution does change it's behaviour with each upgrade to
> current stable versions of it's dependencies from upstream
Either stop spreading FUD, or be way more exact.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.or
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 06:23 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > I am on Ubuntu 13.10
>
> Ah. I am apt to just blame them.
I can test it in some hours or some days, since I've got a Saucy
install. In the past I experienced Evolution as completely unusable for
other Ubuntu releases. Arch Linux
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 08:23 +0100, Rudy van Eijsden wrote:
> When I do "Reply to Sender" in order to reply only to the sender of the
> mail (and not to all people that are in To or Cc), evolution creates a
> reply message, but still includes all people in the Cc field that are
> originally in To an
> >
> > For this particular key I recently replaced the free-form string value
> > with a set of choices - and have been doing so for other similar keys -
> > to try and make dconf tweaking even more foolproof.
>
> Thanks Matthew for changing to a set of choices. I would not have
> known which v
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 06:59 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 11:09 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > You should probably close down evolution completely before doing this,
> > and don't be tempted to randomly change other keys in dconf unless you
> > really, really know what you are
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 11:09 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> You should probably close down evolution completely before doing this,
> and don't be tempted to randomly change other keys in dconf unless you
> really, really know what you are doing.
Actually it's fine to change dconf values while Evolution
> shortly after I started using Evolution as my standard mail client, I
> got asked whether I wanted to have the original message automatically
> closed when clicking on the reply button, to which I agreed. At the time
> I found this useful, not anymore. How do I change that back to the
> default
[cut]
>
> CTRL-L does nothing. 'Reply to list' in the message menu is greyed
> out (disabled).
That suggests that ML is not properly configured.
--
Patryk "LeadMan" Benderz
Linux Registered User #377521
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprie
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:57 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> Aaahh, that would probably explain it then. I can't ask these MS guys to
> fix exchange since I'm supposed to be using Outlook on Windows XP, so I
> suppose I'll just have to live with it.
My experience that even when working for a *lar
On 17 March 2011 14:53, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:27 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> >
> > MS exchange via MAPI. Could it be exchange that's screwing it up?
>
> Quite feasibly.
>
> For the list detection to work, we have to get those headers at the time
> we fetch the mes
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:27 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
>
> MS exchange via MAPI. Could it be exchange that's screwing it up?
Quite feasibly.
For the list detection to work, we have to get those headers at the time
we fetch the message *summary* (when it first appears in the mailbox).
If we
On 17 March 2011 14:22, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:14 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> > I've forwarded a sample to your address.
>
> ... which works perfectly here. If I extract the mail you forwarded, and
> send it to myself as a standalone message rather than an attachmen
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:14 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> I've forwarded a sample to your address.
... which works perfectly here. If I extract the mail you forwarded, and
send it to myself as a standalone message rather than an attachment,
then Ctrl-L works and the 'Reply to List' menu option
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 13:43 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> Good day all,
>
> I am a member of the ubuntu-users list. When I receive an email from
> the list the sender's email address appears in the 'sender' and
> 'reply-to' field, so if 'Reply' is clicked, the reply goes to the
> sender,
Corre
On 17 March 2011 14:10, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:02 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> > CTRL-L does nothing. 'Reply to list' in the message menu is greyed
> > out (disabled).
>
> OK, that sounds like the ubuntu-users list doesn't include *any* of the
> headers that Evoluti
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:02 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> CTRL-L does nothing. 'Reply to list' in the message menu is greyed
> out (disabled).
OK, that sounds like the ubuntu-users list doesn't include *any* of the
headers that Evolution would recognise as "list headers". And there are
a *lot*
On 17 March 2011 13:49, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 13:43 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> >
> > I am a member of the ubuntu-users list. When I receive an email from the
> > list the sender's email address appears in the 'sender' and 'reply-to'
> > field, so if 'Reply' is click
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 13:43 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> The cause of the problem is probably the way the Ubuntu list has been
> set up, but is there a way around this cumbersome cutting and pasting
> I have to do to reply to this list?
Short run: Use Control+L, as you already wrote...
Long run
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 13:43 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
>
> I am a member of the ubuntu-users list. When I receive an email from the
> list the sender's email address appears in the 'sender' and 'reply-to'
> field, so if 'Reply' is clicked, the reply goes to the sender, and if 'Reply
> to all'
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 16:25 +0200, Jeremy Nell wrote:
> Gmail has a very intuitive replying action. If I send an email to John
> Doe, then the email gets sent per usual. If I then remember that I
> forgot to tell him something, I go to that sent email and simply click
> "reply". Gmail inserts hi
Am Montag, den 10.01.2011, 16:25 +0200 schrieb Jeremy Nell:
> Gmail has a very intuitive replying action. If I send an email to John
> Doe, then the email gets sent per usual. If I then remember that I
> forgot to tell him something, I go to that sent email and simply click
> "reply". Gmail inse
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 12:50 +0100, randall wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i'm new with evolution and noticed that i replied twice today to this
> mailing list and forgot to remove the CC recipient when using the reply
> to all button.
> i did found the CTRL + L now, but i was wondering if its possible to
>
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 13:01 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
> > and I think the current Previous/Next buttons are
> > useless, and wish they were Prev Unread/Next Unread.
>
> They are only useful if you enable the preview pane, then you can
> rapidly scroll through messages; but with the ad
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 08:32 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 05:30 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 12, 2009, at 10:39 AM, "Patrick O'Callaghan"
> wrote:
> >
> > > Apparently it doesn't support bottom-posting either.
> >
> > IPhone >=3.0, yes. Blackberry, no.
>
>
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 13:01 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > and I think the current Previous/Next buttons are
> > useless, and wish they were Prev Unread/Next Unread.
>
> They are only useful if you enable the preview pane, then you can
> rapidly scroll through messages; but with the adven
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 12:15 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 05:57 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > Then I wouldn't have to edit an XML file to eliminate that
> > *@&^(@* stupid and useless "Junk" button positioned inconveniently
> > next
> > to the delete button. Ugh.
> Ah, b
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 12:40 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 06:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > I think the project, and the application, is doing great. Compared to
> > the Evolution of old this app rocks (and compared to every other Open
> > Source e-mail/calendar clie
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 06:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> I think the project, and the application, is doing great. Compared to
> the Evolution of old this app rocks (and compared to every other Open
> Source e-mail/calendar client - Evo is leaps and bounds ahead of
> anything else, it is ha
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 22:17 -0400, B. Joshua Rosen wrote:
> I think it's a terrible mistake to be adding any new features to
> Evolution until the bugs have been fixed.
Maybe. This is much more complicated issue than that. Sometimes bugs
are quite difficult whereas a feature implementation migh
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 05:57 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> Then I wouldn't have to edit an XML file to eliminate that
> *@&^(@* stupid and useless "Junk" button positioned inconveniently
> next
> to the delete button. Ugh.
Ah, but I use the Junk/Not Junk buttons. I haven't found a use for th
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 05:30 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
>
> On Oct 12, 2009, at 10:39 AM, "Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote:
>
> > Apparently it doesn't support bottom-posting either.
>
> IPhone >=3.0, yes. Blackberry, no.
I found this hard to credit so I checked on my daughter's BB. It's true
that th
On Oct 12, 2009, at 10:39 AM, "Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote:
Apparently it doesn't support bottom-posting either.
IPhone >=3.0, yes. Blackberry, no.
--
Art Alexion
Sent unsigned from iPod
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
ht
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 16:44 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 10:04 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I mean when I tell me to file a BZ report for some Evo problem, I have
> > to give them the general Gnome BZ URL and hope they can find the right
> > page. There isn't a specific
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 06:16 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > > The most important things to users are,
> > > 1) Reliablity. A program should work all of the time, it should never
> > > crash or hang. Nothing else matters if a program is as unstable as
> > > Evolution has become.
> > I agree. W
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 10:04 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I mean when I tell me to file a BZ report for some Evo problem, I have
> to give them the general Gnome BZ URL and hope they can find the right
> page. There isn't a specific URL for filing a new Evo bug.
This one seems to work for me
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 06:46 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> Netiquette, schmetiquette. Though I usually read this list on my work
> desktop with evolution, this blackberry MUA and others just don't
> support "reply to list". While I agree with your point, the reality is
> that you just can't expect th
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 11:11 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:26 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > It's not as easy to use as it should be (e.g. there
> > doesn't seem to be a way to get a direct URL for the Evo section
> > rather than the whole of Gnome), but it's what we've
volution-list@gnome.org
Sent: Sun Oct 11 18:56:10 2009
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:38 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> There should be one. That is of the form:
> Reply-To: evolution-list@gnome.org
>
> Recently (and not f
> > The most important things to users are,
> > 1) Reliablity. A program should work all of the time, it should never
> > crash or hang. Nothing else matters if a program is as unstable as
> > Evolution has become.
> I agree. While it's true that I haven't seen many crashes in recent
> versions, Ev
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:14 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 20:06 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > There is an outstanding request (from many years ago) for
> > > user-configurable keyboard shortcuts, which for some
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 20:06 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > There is an outstanding request (from many years ago) for
> > user-configurable keyboard shortcuts, which for some reason never seem
> > to get any attention from the devels.
> > If you want the message to go to the mailing list, hit "Reply To
> > List" (Ctrl-L), not "Reply to All", that will make your reply go to the
> > proper place as derived from the mail headers and makes sure the person
> > you are replying to doesn't get two copies. (Another bit of netiquette
>
> > Recently (and not for the first time) I hit Reply to a posting rather
> > than Reply-to-All, and send a message to a poster when I meant to send
> > it to the list.
> If you want the message to go to the mailing list, hit "Reply To
> List" (Ctrl-L), not "Reply to All",
Ditto; just tell your
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:26 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> It's not as easy to use as it should be (e.g. there
> doesn't seem to be a way to get a direct URL for the Evo section
> rather than the whole of Gnome), but it's what we've got.
Hi,
I'm wondering, what do you mean with this?
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 20:06 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > There is an outstanding request (from many years ago) for
> > user-configurable keyboard shortcuts, which for some reason never seem
> > to get any attention from the devels.
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:14 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 20:06 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > There is an outstanding request (from many years ago) for
> > > user-configurable keyboard shortcuts, which for some
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 22:17 -0400, B. Joshua Rosen wrote:
> The most important things to users are,
>
> 1) Reliablity. A program should work all of the time, it should never
> crash or hang. Nothing else matters if a program is as unstable as
> Evolution has become.
I agree. While it's true that
Matthew and the other developers,
I think it's a terrible mistake to be adding any new features to
Evolution until the bugs have been fixed. Nobody cares about
customizable toolbars or keyboard shortcuts, those things can wait.
Evolution is in a terrible state at the moment. It crashes all of the
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 20:06 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > There is an outstanding request (from many years ago) for
> > user-configurable keyboard shortcuts, which for some reason never seem
> > to get any attention from the devels.
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> There is an outstanding request (from many years ago) for
> user-configurable keyboard shortcuts, which for some reason never seem
> to get any attention from the devels. I guess once they do that then a
> customizable icon bar (which
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:08 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > If you want the message to go to the mailing list, hit "Reply To
> > List" (Ctrl-L), not "Reply to All", that will make your reply go to
> the
> > proper place as derived from the mail headers and makes sure the
> person
> > you are rep
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:08 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:56 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:38 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > > There should be one. That is of the form:
> > > Reply-To: evolution-list@gnome.org
> > >
> > > Recently (and not
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:56 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:38 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > There should be one. That is of the form:
> > Reply-To: evolution-list@gnome.org
> >
> > Recently (and not for the first time) I hit Reply to a posting rather
> > than Reply-t
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:38 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> There should be one. That is of the form:
> Reply-To: evolution-list@gnome.org
>
> Recently (and not for the first time) I hit Reply to a posting rather
> than Reply-to-All, and send a message to a poster when I meant to send
> it
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:38 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> There should be one. That is of the form:
> Reply-To: evolution-list@gnome.org
>
> Recently (and not for the first time) I hit Reply to a posting rather
> than Reply-to-All, and send a message to a poster when I meant to send
> it
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 08:43 +0530, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> > When I perform a 'reply' or 'reply to all' to a message received
> > through the MAPI plugin, the mail addresses in the recipient fields
> do
> > not contain the '@some.domain' extension: they only contain the name
> > of the person. The
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 01:36, Vincent Bossier
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I perform a 'reply' or 'reply to all' to a message received
> through the MAPI plugin, the mail addresses in the recipient fields do
> not contain the '@some.domain' extension: they only contain the name
> of the person. The rece
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 14:58 -0500, Bunny Henry wrote:
> Whenever I reply-to-all, the first address in the original TO list
> remains in the TO field and all the other addresses are removed to the
> CC field. Why? How can this be corrected?I expected that all
> addresses in the TO field should
Hmm, no takers to comment on this issue at all, yet. ;)
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:06 -0400, James Pifer wrote:
> I'm a member of a mailing list for our helpdesk. I'm not sure what
> mailing list software they use. If I try to respond to a message that I
> get from the list Evolution wants to do a "
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 13:51 -0400, James Pifer wrote:
> > I don't see the "Newsgroups" line in the headers of my other mailing
> > lists. I'm trying to work with the people on that list to understand
> > what is going on, but I'm not really getting anywhere.
> >
> > I use this same account and cl
69 matches
Mail list logo
