Re: [Evolution] Checking for new mail ...

2011-03-03 Thread Milan Crha
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 01:25 +1100, Bart Steanes wrote: > > So I have a backtrace from during a sync (bt.txt), then another from > the start of the next sync attempt (bt2.txt). Hi, I do not see anything special on them, the first is refreshing folder (downloading information about it), the

Re: [Evolution] Checking for new mail ...

2011-03-03 Thread Bart Steanes
On 2 March 2011 18:05, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 03:29 +1100, Bart Steanes wrote: > > And as if scanning the whole inbox wasn't bad enough, the scanning > > process (otherwise known as "Checking for new mail") usually fails. > > Hi, > any error message given or just stuck?

Re: [Evolution] Checking for new mail ...

2011-03-01 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 03:29 +1100, Bart Steanes wrote: > And as if scanning the whole inbox wasn't bad enough, the scanning > process (otherwise known as "Checking for new mail") usually fails. Hi, any error message given or just stuck? The error message can ba also on console, thus please

Re: [Evolution] Checking for new mail ...

2011-03-01 Thread Bart Steanes
On 2 March 2011 03:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 01:27 +1100, Bart Steanes wrote: > > Yes, without any real success. > > [Please don't top-post here] > > How about using --force-shutdown? Does that help? > > poc > > Apologies for top posting. Too used to corporate email.

Re: [Evolution] Checking for new mail ...

2011-03-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 01:27 +1100, Bart Steanes wrote: > Yes, without any real success. [Please don't top-post here] How about using --force-shutdown? Does that help? poc ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list opt

Re: [Evolution] Checking for new mail ...

2011-03-01 Thread Bart Steanes
On 2 March 2011 01:25, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Tuesday, March 01, 2011 a las 09:43:34AM -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan > escribió: > > > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 23:55 +1100, Bart Steanes wrote: > > > After a network dropout (while using evolution on the train for > example) re > > > syncing see

Re: [Evolution] Checking for new mail ...

2011-03-01 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Tuesday, March 01, 2011 a las 09:43:34AM -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan escribió: > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 23:55 +1100, Bart Steanes wrote: > > After a network dropout (while using evolution on the train for example) re > > syncing seems to fail much. > > > > For example I have not successful

Re: [Evolution] Checking for new mail ...

2011-03-01 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 01:27 +1100, Bart Steanes wrote: > Yes, without any real success. > > What usually works best (for some new definition of best) is > "encouraging it to try again" by pressing send receive. > > After say 10 goes over a 1-2h period it will usually succeed, provided > the link

Re: [Evolution] Checking for new mail ...

2011-03-01 Thread Bart Steanes
Yes, without any real success. What usually works best (for some new definition of best) is "encouraging it to try again" by pressing send receive. After say 10 goes over a 1-2h period it will usually succeed, provided the link is _really_ reliable (hotel wifi doesn't usually work, nor my 3G usb

Re: [Evolution] Checking for new mail ...

2011-03-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 23:55 +1100, Bart Steanes wrote: > After a network dropout (while using evolution on the train for example) re > syncing seems to fail much. > > For example I have not successfully sync'd in the last 12hours although I've > tried several times including for the last hour usi