On 2021-03-20 at 12:03 -0400, George Reeke wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-03-20 at 00:21 +0100, Ángel wrote:
> > On 2021-03-18 at 09:42 -0400, George Reeke wrote:
> > > Milan, thanks for letting me know it's fixed, it is easy enough
> > > to click the middle button instead (really a scroll wheel, that's
> >
On Sat, 2021-03-20 at 00:21 +0100, Ángel wrote:
> On 2021-03-18 at 09:42 -0400, George Reeke wrote:
> > Milan, thanks for letting me know it's fixed, it is easy enough
> > to click the middle button instead (really a scroll wheel, that's
> > why I was avoiding it). --trimmed--
>
> Is it happening
On 2021-03-18 at 09:42 -0400, George Reeke wrote:
> Milan, thanks for letting me know it's fixed, it is easy enough
> to click the middle button instead (really a scroll wheel, that's
> why I was avoiding it). As for "ancient", well, this is standard
> on CentOS 7, which is supported until 2024 an
On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 08:16 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> Hi,
> your version is really ancient. There will be released 3.40.0 stable
> series shortly (tomorrow). It's a very long gap between 3.28.5 and
> 3.40.0.
>
> On a good side, this had been fixed meanwhile, I cannot re
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 21:00 -0400, George Reeke wrote:
> > I also have Centos 7 with mate desktop using evolution 3.28.5
> > (3.28.5-10.el7) and it works fine for me. I do not clink into the
> > cc
> > field Just hover over it and paste.
> >
> > Ron
>
> [For some reason, CTRL-L does not work with
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 14:04 -0400, George Reeke wrote:
> I will report it unless somebody on this list tells
> me it's really a great feature or my recent version is too ancient.
Hi,
your version is really ancient. There will be released 3.40.0 stable
series shortly (tomorrow). It's a very
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 18:11 +, Ronald Tidwell @CA wrote:
> I also have Centos 7 with mate desktop using evolution 3.28.5
> (3.28.5-10.el7) and it works fine for me. I do not clink into the cc
> field Just hover over it and paste.
>
> Ron
[For some reason, CTRL-L does not work with your messag
I also have Centos 7 with mate desktop using evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-10.el7)
and it works fine for me. I do not clink into the cc field Just hover over it
and paste.
Ron
--
Ron Tidwell
Spears Manufacturing Co.
Sylmar
Phone: (818) 364-1611 x4274
Santa Paula
Phone: (805) 421-5660 x5012
Em
Hi,
On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 14:27 +0100, Guy via evolution-list wrote:
> Bonjour, j'ai un "bug" sur calendrier d'évolution, il me demande tout
> le temps le mot de passe du compte.
> (je suis sur que c'est le bon mot de passe). c'est comme si il ne
> l'enregistrait pas.
> et pourtant je peux pourtan
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:02 -0500, steve Interdonato wrote:
> When you change (add/remove) inbox title columns to say sender (which
> you want to see of course who sent you the email) Evolution also
> changes the Sent folder title to the same as the inbox title. And
> visa versa, if you change the
where is that option called; "Apply the same view settings to all folders"?
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 21:19 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> "Apply the same view settings to all folders"___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your lis
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:02 -0500, steve Interdonato wrote:
> When you change (add/remove) inbox title columns to say sender (which
> you want to see of course who sent you the email) Evolution also
> changes the Sent folder title to the same as the inbox title. And
> visa versa, if you change the
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:02 -0500, steve Interdonato wrote:
>
> When you change (add/remove) inbox title columns to say sender (which you
> want to see of course who sent you the email) Evolution also changes the
> Sent folder title to the same as the inbox title. And visa versa, if you
> change
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 19:56 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>
>
> > (spamassassin tests for lots of issues with the HELO string - one of
> > them is for a "bare IP" address, another for "numeric HELO".)
>
> This is exactly the type of the information I'm looking for. I do not
> know all the consequence
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 19:10 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 19:56 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > > I don't really want to comment on the bug) but would err on the
> > > side of leaving things as they are - it just looks less spammy.
> >
> > Is 'err' a typo? I'm afraid I do
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 19:56 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I don't really want to comment on the bug) but would err on the side
> > of leaving things as they are - it just looks less spammy.
>
> Is 'err' a typo? I'm afraid I do not follow, if not.
"To err" is correct English for "to make a mistake
Hi,
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 17:59 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I personally wouldn't be excessively worried either way (which is why
> I don't really want to comment on the bug) but would err on the side
> of leaving things as they are - it just looks less spammy.
Is 'err' a typo? I'm afraid
>
> Anyway, I would like to ask other evolution-list members to join the
> bug [2] and express their opinion there, if they have any, want to and
> can. I agree with Josh that the local machine name exposure is not
> always expected, even just in the tracking headers, which can be used
> to searc
Hi,
I'm adding evolution-list back into the loop. We had several private
exchanges with Josh, initiated by him. I'm not going to copy here all
we exchanged, most of that was just a noise. I have a plea for the
evolution-list members at the end, which is the 'why' for going back
into the pub
On Saturday, September 30, 2017 11:30 AM, Berend De Schouwer
wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 17:06 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:13 AM, Pete Biggs > k> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > ps BTW, the senders IP address is usually inserted by the MTA, not
>
On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 17:06 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
>
> On Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:13 AM, Pete Biggs k> wrote:
>
>
> > ps BTW, the senders IP address is usually inserted by the MTA, not
> > the
> > MUA in the headers. Good luck with getting that changed.
>
> Pete,
>
On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 17:06 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> You probably haven't read anything I've said before.
Hi Josh,
please see https://wiki.gnome.org/Foundation/CodeOfConduct
Thank you! :)
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
On Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:13 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
> ps BTW, the senders IP address is usually inserted by the MTA, not the
> MUA in the headers. Good luck with getting that changed.
Pete,
You probably haven't read anything I've said before.
IP address is inserted by thunderbird MUA
On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 21:41 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> No recipient needs to know neither sender's workstation IP address
> nor its real host name.
Normally, headers don't contain the "sender's workstation IP address"
unless the sender's MUA inserts it as a body header, and more o
>
>
> No recipient needs to know neither sender's workstation IP address
> nor its real host name.
>
I would disagree with that. The headers are mainly there for debugging
and auditing not for "informing" the end recipient - putting bogus
information in those headers just negates their primary
Here is the patch
diff -up
evolution-data-server-3.24.6/src/camel/providers/smtp/camel-smtp-transport.c.orig
evolution-data-server-3.24.6/src/camel/providers/smtp/camel-smtp-transport.c
---
evolution-data-server-3.24.6/src/camel/providers/smtp/camel-smtp-transport.c.orig
2017-09-27 19:06:32
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 10:31 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 09:53 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
>> Where is the function responsible for helo message?
> Hi,
> it's here:
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution-data-server/tree/src/camel/providers/smtp/camel-sm
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 09:53 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> Where is the function responsible for helo message?
Hi,
it's here:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution-data-server/tree/src/camel/providers/smtp/camel-smtp-transport.c?h=gnome-3-24#n1388
> PS. The fact that pretty
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 2:31 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 17:30 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
>> local IP is better.
> Hi,
> maybe. It still exposes some details about the network, like what
> internal IP range is in use.
exposing internal range is much safe
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 17:30 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> local IP is better.
Hi,
maybe. It still exposes some details about the network, like what
internal IP range is in use.
I just tried with a Google account and the first Received header
contains "localhost.localdomain"
On Monday, September 25, 2017 3:41 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 17:36 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
>> Sent from evolution:
>> Received: from [external IP] ([external IP:port]
>> helo=myhost.mydomain.ext)
>>
>> Sent from thunderbird:
>> Received: from [external IP
On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 17:36 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> Sent from evolution:
> Received: from [external IP] ([external IP:port]
> helo=myhost.mydomain.ext)
>
> Sent from thunderbird:
> Received: from [external IP] ([external IP:port] helo=[local IP])
Hi,
what is better on
On 09/22/2017 04:54 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 14:10 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
>
>> Greetings to evolution team!
>> Just today I wanted to start using the program but uncovered a stopper,
>> listed in subject.
>> To my huge surprise it has been report
On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 14:10 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> Greetings to evolution team!
>
> Just today I wanted to start using the program but uncovered a stopper,
> listed in subject.
> To my huge surprise it has been reported almost three years ago and still
> completely ignored.
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 10:34 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773311
>
> It's already reported as #757504
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757504
>
> and discussed on this list starting at
>
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution
Thank you for the info.
I hope that will be fixed :)
Le lundi 20 février 2017 à 10:34 +, Pete Biggs a écrit :
> >
> >
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773311
>
> It's already reported as #757504
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757504
>
> and discussed on thi
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773311
It's already reported as #757504
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757504
and discussed on this list starting at
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2016-September/msg00195.html
A workaround is to change the line w
Dear Angel, dear Milan,
thank you for pointing this out. The time zone is Europe/Berlin. And
indeed, according to wikipedia, there was no DST in Germany from 1950
to 1980.
So, it's a flaming mess. On the other hand, I would expect a birthday to
be a full calendar day, no matter at what time it s
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 14:12 +0100, Herr Oswald wrote:
> On my 3.16.0, ubuntu 15.04, I've got the same problem.
> Could this be related to a well-known ubuntu bug:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/100
> 0182
Hi,
I do not use that indicator-datetime, but
On my 3.16.0, ubuntu 15.04, I've got the same problem.
Could this be related to a well-known ubuntu bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1000182
?
W
Am Freitag, den 27.11.2015, 08:11 +0100 schrieb Milan Crha:
> On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 00:11 +0100, Rolf Würtz wro
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 00:11 +0100, Rolf Würtz wrote:
> However, if the person is 67 or older, the birthday gets displayed
> the day before at 23:00.
Hi,
it's basically this:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748465
which leads to this:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Rolf Würtz wrote:
> However, if the person is 67 or older, the birthday gets displayed
> the day before at 23:00.
>
> Is there any reason behind it, am I doing something wrong, or is
> it simply a bug?
>
> Best
>
> Rolf
Seems timezone related. Either with being born in Summer/Winter time,
or
Dario Lesca wrote:
>
> > > (NOTE: enable the external editor it's not a valid solution)
> >
> > Ah. I found this note down here but somehow the reasons why "it's
> not
> > a valid solution" seem to have gotten lost. :(
> The reason are many, I have set external editor to "gedit", and the
> html
Il giorno mar, 13/10/2015 alle 14.28 +0200, Andre Klapper ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 14:25 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> > But why it's not possible remove webkit editor and restore the old
> > build-in editor?
>
> As I wrote: You can, by going back to version 3.12.
>
> In 3.16 and later t
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 14:25 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> But why it's not possible remove webkit editor and restore the old
> build-in editor?
As I wrote: You can, by going back to version 3.12.
In 3.16 and later the entire ancient rotting GtkHtml editor codebase
has been replaced by an editor cod
Il giorno mar, 13/10/2015 alle 07.53 -0400, Paul Smith ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 12:54 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > > What is the difficulty to remove the bugs
> >
> > The difficulty is that manpower is limited. Your patches are highly
> > welcome to fix problems faster.
>
> The best
Il giorno mar, 13/10/2015 alle 12.54 +0200, Andre Klapper ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 12:16 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749712
> >
> > This is a very old, annoying and serious bug.
>
> It's only a few months old. I can offer your bug reports wh
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 12:54 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > What is the difficulty to remove the bugs
>
> The difficulty is that manpower is limited. Your patches are highly
> welcome to fix problems faster.
The best thing to do is to go help the WebKit folks, and/or follow the
bug there as menti
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 12:16 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749712
>
> This is a very old, annoying and serious bug.
It's only a few months old. I can offer your bug reports which are more
than 10 years old. Age is irrelevant when discussing issues.
Annoying
reopen 795287
thanks
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 17:10 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 10/09/15 16:33, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 14:55 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > Removing that account in preferences and setting it up again does
> > > not feel nice, even if the gmail acco
On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 13:18 +0200, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu wrote:
> Except that I've lost my few (not very important) calendar
> information.
Hi,
[side note: top-posting is considered 'bad' on this mailing list]
You can import also calendars, check the content of the old version of
~/
Hi,
Sorry for the later posting error. That's the default behavior of my
webmail client. I forgot to check recipient.
Now I've been able to set up accounts, and I'm in the (long and tedious)
process of importing back all the old mboxes I had, one after another.
I'd say that all this ends-up well
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 14:55 +0200, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu wrote:
> If I'm understanding correctly your advice, the best would be to get
> ride of the old data. And then importing again in a newly configured
> evolution. If that's right, I'm intending to proceed the following
> way :
> 1) Moving a
Thank you Milan and Patrick for help.
After witnessing no message with strace -p, I've killed evolution main
process and subprocesses (evolution-sourc.., evolution-alarm,
evolution-calen...).
A weird detail is I have no ~/.evolution.
All I can find in my home are the following : ""
~ $ find . -n
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 14:07 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Size of the mailstore
> > * I'm not sure of the mailstore location. Here is what I currently have on
> > disk :
> > $ du -ms .local/share/evolution/mail/ .config/evolution/mail/
> > 3500.local/share/evolution/mail/
> > 2 .c
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 13:06 +0200, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for your answer. Here are more in formations corresponding to
> your questions. Please, do not hesitate to ask many more. I'm very grateful
> for any kind of help and then very willing to fully collaborate.
>
Hello,
Thank you for your answer. Here are more in formations corresponding to
your questions. Please, do not hesitate to ask many more. I'm very grateful
for any kind of help and then very willing to fully collaborate.
Process running ?
* To be able to use my computer, I have to SIGSTOP the proc
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:40 +0200, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently upgraded my evolution (and gnome, and gtk, and so on) from
> the older version 2 to version 3 ; precisely I've installed evolution
> 3.10.4-r1 from gentoo.
>
> At startup evolution has asked to transition
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 11:44 -0800, George J. Walsh wrote:
> With receiving type set to 'Local Delivery' the mail box address is
> auto-set to 'None' whereas in the past it was always set to
> '/var/spool/mail/[login name]'. I attempted to change this but was over
> written at each attempt. The thin
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 07:48 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'd say to open a new bug report for that, it seems like a fallout
from
> a faulty migration (I do not know in what state your machine was
before
> the upgrade to rawhide).
Milan:
I've now upgraded the f18 server to rawhide
Am Mittwoch, den 06.03.2013, 09:18 +0100 schrieb Andre Klapper:
> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 01:34 +0100, Remi wrote:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1049028
>
> Feel free to add your comments in
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1049028
>
> There
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 11:45 -0800, George J. Walsh wrote:
> GDBus.
> Error:org.gtk.GDBus.UnmappedGError.Quark._g_2dkey_2dfile_2derror_2dquark.Code4:
> Data source is missing a [Data Source] group
Hi,
I'd say to open a new bug report for that, it seems like a fallout from
a faulty migration
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 01:34 +0100, Remi wrote:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1049028
Feel free to add your comments in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1049028
There is obviously nothing that upstream developers can do about
packaging mistakes
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 09:41 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:45 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on Fedora 17),
> > instead of opening the menu, it opens a new message. The only way I can
> > get the Message menu dropdown to
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 14:04 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> Do you see any other oddities in the way the mouse clicking works either
> in Evolution itself or in any other application?
Not that I've noticed. All the other drop-downs in Evolution work right.
Alt-M works ok in Evolution. Haven't seen
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:45 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on Fedora 17),
> instead of opening the menu, it opens a new message. The only way I can
> get the Message menu dropdown to open is to remember to click-and-hold
> the mouse button down unt
> I presumed that re-installing would also re-do any relevant config
> files. Apparently that is not the case.
Nope, never, it does not work that way.
Application installation / de-installation is a *system* operation.
Application configuration is a *user* operation.
The package neither kno
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 22:57 -0200, Lailah wrote:
>
>
> El jue, 11-10-2012 a las 20:58 -0400, Carpetnailz escribió:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:00 -0500, dbrenner wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:45 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > > > When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on F
> > But issues with mouse clicks, etc... are probably from below evolution
> > [like in X, your video driver, or Gtk].
> >
> How would that affect just one menu button in the app and nothing else?
>
You never said it was ONLY that one menu!
Do you see any other oddities in the way the mouse cl
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 08:43 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > > So why is it happening? I've re-installed evo twice, once with
> > > add/remove software and once with yum. Makes no difference.
> > Why do you think adding and removing the packages(s) will do anything?
> > And whatever front end you use
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 05:32 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 20:58 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:00 -0500, dbrenner wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:45 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > > > When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on F
El jue, 11-10-2012 a las 20:58 -0400, Carpetnailz escribió:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:00 -0500, dbrenner wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:45 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > > When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on Fedora 17),
> > > instead of opening the menu, it opens a new
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 09:36 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> This concept of re-installing software to make it work again is a
> total
> Windows anomaly - it only works in Windows because of the ability to
> over-write system DLLs (i.e. some other software package installed a
> "better" version of a DLL
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 20:58 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:00 -0500, dbrenner wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:45 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > > When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on Fedora 17),
> > > instead of opening the menu, it opens a new message.
> > > When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on Fedora 17),
> > > instead of opening the menu, it opens a new message. The only way I can
> > > get the Message menu dropdown to open is to remember to click-and-hold
> > > the mouse button down until it opens. This seems contrary to h
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 20:58 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:00 -0500, dbrenner wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:45 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > > When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on Fedora 17),
> > > instead of opening the menu, it opens a new message.
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:00 -0500, dbrenner wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:45 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on Fedora 17),
> > instead of opening the menu, it opens a new message. The only way I can
> > get the Message menu dropdown to open i
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:45 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on Fedora 17),
> instead of opening the menu, it opens a new message. The only way I can
> get the Message menu dropdown to open is to remember to click-and-hold
> the mouse button down unt
Dear Andre,
Am Mittwoch, den 23.11.2011, 16:14 +0100 schrieb Andre Klapper:
> On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 15:19 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > trying to save the message to intel-gfx [1]
> >
> > Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: By default, enable RC6 on IVB and
> > SNB when reasonable
> >
Dear Milan,
Am Montag, den 17.10.2011, 09:47 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha:
> On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 16:53 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > I am using Evolution 3.0.3-2 from Debian Sid/unstable. My Google Mail
> > account was set up some years ago using IMAP.
> >
> > Now I am experiencing the following p
On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 16:53 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> I am using Evolution 3.0.3-2 from Debian Sid/unstable. My Google Mail
> account was set up some years ago using IMAP.
>
> Now I am experiencing the following problem. I am selecting the account
> to view the message list. Strangely not the me
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 18:31 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 18:10 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > We try, but, honestly, we're not much people on that and I don't have
> > that much time myself. Some people report in Debian and then in upstream
> > bugzilla, or report to De
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 18:10 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> We try, but, honestly, we're not much people on that and I don't have
> that much time myself. Some people report in Debian and then in upstream
> bugzilla, or report to Debian and then look in upstream bugzilla and
> find a relevant bug
On mer., 2011-08-24 at 16:47 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:46 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 08:34 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > After having a lot of problems with earlier 2.x versions of evo (some
> > > still not yet solved), at l
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 17:09 -0700, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> machine: lenovo x60 laptop
> kernel: Linux xxx-mobl2 2.6.35.13-91.fc14.i686 #1 SMP Tue May 3
> 13:36:36 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> # rpm -qa|grep evolut
> evolution-data-server-2.32.2-1.fc14.i686
> evolution-devel-2.32.2-1.fc14.
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I bet it's the empty TZID which is causing it to break. Exchange is
> *such* a pile of crap. We should probably pre-parse the MimeContent from
> the server and fix that up to call it 'unknown' or something.
>
> Better still, we should stop trusting Mi
more info after debug packages:
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";>
http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/types";
MajorVersion="8" MinorVersion="2" MajorBuildNumber="2
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 17:09 -0700, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> QkVHSU46VkNBTEVOREFSDQpNRVRIT0
> Q6UFVCTElTSA0KUFJPRElEOk1pY3Jvc29mdCBFeGNoYW5nZSBTZXJ2ZXIgMjAwNw0K
> VkVSU0lPTjoyLjANCkJFR0lOOlZUSU1FWk9ORQ0KVFpJRDoNCkJFR0lOOlNUQU5EQV
> JEDQpEVFNUQVJUOjE2MDEwMTAxVDAyMDAwMA0KVFpPRkZTRVRGUk9NOi0wNzAwDQpU
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 04:09 -0600, David wrote:
> I reported this bug on 6/18/2009. Does anyone know if there are any
> plans to fix it soon? Essentially the bug is that the MAPI plugin
> cannot
> authenticate to an Exchange server that requires SSL access. Servers
> that don't require SSL are
David wrote:
> I reported this bug on 6/18/2009. Does anyone know if there are any
> plans to fix it soon? Essentially the bug is that the MAPI plugin cannot
> authenticate to an Exchange server that requires SSL access. Servers
> that don't require SSL are readily accessible. There is no opti
> I love Linux and Evolution, but my job requires full access to Exchange
>Server. I really want
> to dump Windows.
But does your employer want you to do that? Back from my sysadmin
days, I remember how we loathed people who
"knew better" and just had to do things in their own way disrupting
comp
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 10:22 -0500, Art Alexion wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 09:59 -0500, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Feel free to post the BZ number so others can add comments.
>
> Bug #30689
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306869
>
Further:
From: Pedro Villavicencio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 09:59 -0500, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Feel free to post the BZ number so others can add comments.
Bug #30689
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306869
--
Art Alexion
Resources for Human Development, Inc. 215-951-0300 x3075
4700 Wissahickon Ave.
I just did.
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:18 -0500, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 14:14 -0500, Art Alexion wrote:
> > Ubuntu 8.10
> > Evo 2.24.2
> >
> >
> > Set to prompt when a receipt/confirmation is requested. It does. I say
> > no. It sends one anyway!
>
> If so, definite
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 14:14 -0500, Art Alexion wrote:
> Ubuntu 8.10
> Evo 2.24.2
>
>
> Set to prompt when a receipt/confirmation is requested. It does. I say
> no. It sends one anyway!
If so, definitely worth filing a report to Bugzilla.
poc
___
E
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 22:31 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> A while ago I filed the following bug report, but got no reaction. Are
> other users of Evolution having the same problem or is it just me?
Dumping the original bug report to the list has had the desired effect: a
discussion of the problem
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 17:07 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> 2.12 is pretty old. I don't see this happening on 2.22 (the latest
> stable version). You should consider upgrading.
A bit related to this should be a fix in bug #519292, at least for
expand all/collapse all issue.
Milan
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 22:31 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Hello!
>
> A while ago I filed the following bug report, but got no reaction. Are
> other users of Evolution having the same problem or is it just me?
>
>
> I have threaded mail view enab
l Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Bug
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:59:42 -0400
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 08:23 -0400, Rob Cambra wrote:
> For instance, when a user receives an HTML message with graphic
On 10/26/07, Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 06:35 -0600, Todd Ness wrote:
> > > I represent a company with 600+ end users. We are actively seeking
> > > replacements for many Microsoft technologies such as Outlook/Exchange
> > > and MS Office. We are curren
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
