On Saturday, September 30, 2017 11:30 AM, Berend De Schouwer <berend.de.schou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 17:06 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote: >> >> On Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:13 AM, Pete Biggs <p...@biggs.org.u >> k> wrote: >> >> >> > ps BTW, the senders IP address is usually inserted by the MTA, not >> > the >> > MUA in the headers. Good luck with getting that changed. >> >> Pete, >> >> You probably haven't read anything I've said before. >> IP address is inserted by thunderbird MUA by HELO=my_IP_address >> Hostname is inserted by evolution MUA by HELO=my_hostname > It is *provided* by the MUA to the MTA. It is *inserted* in the > Received header by the MTA. Nothing blocks the MTA from adding the MUA > IP address *despite* the information provided in the HELO message.
Fine, I agree. Let HELO be *provided* by MUA and *inserted* as is by MTA as said in RFC, I suppose. At least it is an observed behavior among all public mail servers I have access to. > PS. It sounds like you want anon.penet.fi to return. Absolutely not. Another example of catching only a tail of conversation and making wrong conclusion. I said at the very beginning that I want evolution behave *exactly* as thunderbird and offered a patch. That is all. I am not going to continue this discussion. Josh. _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
