On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 06:47 +0200, Herr Oswald wrote:
> Hi, how did you manage to get to 3.2.3 even on ubuntu 12? - I only
> could
> gt as far as 3.10 4 - on ubuntu 14.04.
3.2 was released in 2011/2012.
3.10 was released in 2013/2014.
10 > 2.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blog
Am Montag, den 29.06.2015, 16:25 -0700 schrieb Brewster Gillett:
> Using Ubuntu's 12.04 Debian (their 14.04 has broken Raid Level 1,
> which I use, so I'm holding off until I'm sure it's fixed) and Evolution
> 3.2.3.
Hi, how did you manage to get to 3.2.3 even on ubuntu 12? - I only could
gt as fa
Using Ubuntu's 12.04 Debian (their 14.04 has broken Raid Level 1,
which I use, so I'm holding off until I'm sure it's fixed) and Evolution
3.2.3.
I have encountered considerable difficulty over time with the management
of both primary and subsidiary mail folders. Every so often one of them
will un
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 10:51 +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> 4.Followed this page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Backtrace to get the
> backtrace. Two first attempts finished with evolution hanging - I had to
> kill it, two next (attaching to existing process) allowed me to return
> to gdb, but there was no
[cut]
> I don't care if Ubuntu's tools care about corefiles. :)
> Most useful stacktrace is in "gdb-evolution-3.txt" in your attachment.
> SIGSEGV seems to always happen in em_utils_selection_set_urilist in
> em-utils.c.
Hi Andre,
good to see that it helped. Is there some other way I can hel you gu
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 10:51 +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> I still am willing to provide backtrace, but I need some help, as my
> attempts didn't produced corefile - see attachments for output. Any
> hints?
I don't care if Ubuntu's tools care about corefiles. :)
Most useful stacktrace is in "gdb-e
[cut]
> As you can reproduce this, could you try to get the backtrace with debug
> symbols
Yes, very willingly, but shame to say, I need some help with that - see
details below.
> and possibly try a valgrind,
Done.
[cut]
Following some of steps here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProg
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 09:07 +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1202945
Hi,
I tried to reproduce this with a version which will be 3.8.4, and it
works fine for me, I can move local folder as I wish, by drag & drop.
The bug backtrace doesn't show
bg:
> [cut]
> > Ubuntu 12.04, Evolution 3.2.3, Using Evo for at least 7 years,
> > about 9000 msgs currently in all folders
> [cut]
> > Evo will let me move these folders anywhere I wish, provided I move them
> > to live *under* some other "top-level" folder. But I cannot move them to
> > where
[cut]
> Ubuntu 12.04, Evolution 3.2.3, Using Evo for at least 7 years,
> about 9000 msgs currently in all folders
Mine setup: Ubuntu 13.04 with Evolution 3.8.3
[cut]
> Evo will let me move these folders anywhere I wish, provided I move them
> to live *under* some other "top-level" folder. But I
I have posted this query once or twice before, and it apparently hit the
list when nobody who knew anything about the problem was currently
reading it. Since those unproductive attempts, I have invested probably
eight or ten hours in scouring the Web for references to this problem,
and cannot find
Il giorno gio, 05/03/2009 alle 16.42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan ha
scritto:
> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 21:49 +0100, Ambrogio De Lorenzo wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm using Evo 2.22.3.1 from Fedora 9.
> > I'm changing my email structure from evolution files and folders to IMAP
> > server.
> > I creat
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 11:24 -0500, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 11:34 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 07:09 -0500, Art Alexion wrote:
> > > I know the following breaks filters. Delete a destination folder.
> > > Recreate it with the same name. The filter is
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 11:04 -0500, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 07:09 -0500, Art Alexion wrote:
> > I know the following breaks filters. Delete a destination folder.
> > Recreate it with the same name. The filter is still there, i.e. the
> > test portion is there, but there i
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 11:34 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 07:09 -0500, Art Alexion wrote:
> > I know the following breaks filters. Delete a destination folder.
> > Recreate it with the same name. The filter is still there, i.e. the
> > test portion is there, but there i
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 07:09 -0500, Art Alexion wrote:
> I know the following breaks filters. Delete a destination folder.
> Recreate it with the same name. The filter is still there, i.e. the
> test portion is there, but there is no destination.
>
> I have done this using web access to the accoun
-list@gnome.org
Sent: Thu Mar 05 16:12:04 2009
Subject: Re: [Evolution] moving folders from local to imap doesn't update
filters
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 21:49 +0100, Ambrogio De Lorenzo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using Evo 2.22.3.1 from Fedora 9.
> I'm changing my email str
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 21:49 +0100, Ambrogio De Lorenzo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using Evo 2.22.3.1 from Fedora 9.
> I'm changing my email structure from evolution files and folders to IMAP
> server.
> I created my server, and I'm moving a folder.
How did you move the folder?
> I have a filter th
Hi all,
I'm using Evo 2.22.3.1 from Fedora 9.
I'm changing my email structure from evolution files and folders to IMAP
server.
I created my server, and I'm moving a folder.
I have a filter that move messages from the inbox to this folder, and
after the moving I see the message that tell me that fi
19 matches
Mail list logo
