On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 11:04 -0500, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 07:09 -0500, Art Alexion wrote: > > I know the following breaks filters. Delete a destination folder. > > Recreate it with the same name. The filter is still there, i.e. the > > test portion is there, but there is no destination. > > > > I have done this using web access to the account when there is no > easy > > way to otherwise empty the folder. > > > > I think this is evidence that the filtration back end tracks folders > > in suc a way that any modifications to the folders breaks the > filter. > > No it isn't. If it's evidence of anything, it's that the filter code > doesn't remember that you once had a folder with a specific name but > then removed it (using a procedure external to Evolution). I'm not > really surprised this doesn't work.
But if I add and immediately recreate a folder with the same name, externally, how would Evolution even know that the folder momentarily didn't exist? -- Art Alexion Resources for Human Development, Inc. 215-951-0300 x3075 4700 Wissahickon Ave. a...@rhd.org Philadelphia, PA 19144 267-615-3172 _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
