Hi Bao,
On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 10:09 +1000, Bao via evolution-list wrote:
> Why do I get these error message all the time, even though emails
> load ok - usually?
>
> ERRORS IN ALL MY 3 ACCOUNTS
>
> Error while Retrieving folder list for “goers...@zoho.com”.
>
> Error fetching folders: expecting nu
Hi all.
Why do I get these error message all the time, even though emails load
ok - usually?
ERRORS IN ALL MY 3 ACCOUNTS
Error while Retrieving folder list for “goers...@zoho.com”.
Error fetching folders: expecting number
--
___
Confidentiality: The contents of this email and acc
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 02:16 +0200, Ángel González wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Any distributed system is subject to partial failure, i.e. one part
> > stops working or loses communication with another part. If data is in
> > the process of being moved between the two parts when that happ
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 02:16 +0200, Ángel González wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Any distributed system is subject to partial failure, i.e. one part
> > stops working or loses communication with another part. If data is in
> > the process of being moved between the two parts when that happ
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Any distributed system is subject to partial failure, i.e. one part
> stops working or loses communication with another part. If data is in
> the process of being moved between the two parts when that happens, the
> designer has to decide between allowing data to be los
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 18:26 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 10:22 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote:
> > On 9/3/2014 5:45 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > > I've never heard of a problem of IMAP duplicating emails and, knowing
> > > how the protocol works, I can't see how it can!
> >
> > The protoco
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 22:21 +0200, Ángel González wrote:
> On Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 22:19 +0200, Ángel González wrote:
> > > Moreover, that emails can be searched without a warrant in the US
> > > (where most email companies are) unless you haven't read it and it is
>
On Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 22:19 +0200, Ángel González wrote:
> > Moreover, that emails can be searched without a warrant in the US
> > (where most email companies are) unless you haven't read it and it is
> > newer than 180 days.
>
> It's worse than that. In a current c
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 10:22 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote:
> On 9/3/2014 5:45 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > I've never heard of a problem of IMAP duplicating emails and, knowing
> > how the protocol works, I can't see how it can!
>
> The protocol won't, but servers and clients will.
>
> I've had Thunderbird
On 9/3/2014 5:45 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
I've never heard of a problem of IMAP duplicating emails and, knowing
how the protocol works, I can't see how it can!
The protocol won't, but servers and clients will.
I've had Thunderbird (old version, now fixed) time out while copying
large numbers of
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 12:45 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 13:28 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > Why do people still use POP [...]?
> >
> > Because of the issues I experienced when using IMAP, such as receiving
> > the messages two times. I never run into such evil issues when u
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 13:28 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Why do people still use POP [...]?
>
> Because of the issues I experienced when using IMAP, such as receiving
> the messages two times. I never run into such evil issues when using
> POP. Once there are multiple copies of hundreds of email
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 13:28 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Why do people still use POP [...]?
>
> Because of the issues I experienced when using IMAP, such as receiving
> the messages two times. I never run into such evil issues when using
> POP. Once there are multiple copies of hundreds of email
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 04:34 -0600, Bart wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 10:26 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> > I suspect that 90% of the problems reported are with IMAP because
> >90%
> > of people use IMAP.
>
> I'm not so sure. Most of the people I know use web mail. They do
> everything through
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 09:37 -0400, Robert Seward wrote:
> I prefer POP with Evolution because it is more stable for me than
> IMAP.
> About half my accounts are POP and half are IMAP.
+1 +1
None of my accounts is IMAP anymore :p.
___
evolution-list ma
> Why do people still use POP [...]?
Because of the issues I experienced when using IMAP, such as receiving
the messages two times. I never run into such evil issues when using
POP. Once there are multiple copies of hundreds of emails in your
private email archive, you can't get rid of those.
__
> > I suspect that 90% of the problems reported are with IMAP because >90%
> > of people use IMAP.
>
> I'm not so sure. Most of the people I know use web mail.
I meant with Evolution ...
> They do
> everything through their browser. Is that IMAP?
No. Not at all. IMAP is a protocol for a
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 10:26 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I suspect that 90% of the problems reported are with IMAP because >90%
> of people use IMAP.
I'm not so sure. Most of the people I know use web mail. They do
everything through their browser. Is that IMAP? I want no part of
that!
>
> Ba
> They use POP because they do not want their mail residing on someone
> else's computer.
Hmm, all my mail resides on my own computers and I use IMAP. (Well, I
have a gmail account somewhere, but that's the only one!)
> I know it passes through other systems, but I have some messages that
> re
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 05:01:22 -0600
From: Bart
> But, to inject a bit of controversy into this, is the usage of the very
> old POP protocol sufficient that the devs should spend time looking at
> this sort of issue?
Absolutely!
> Why do people still use POP, when IMAP is a more
> complete
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 22:19 +0200, Ángel González wrote:
> Moreover, that emails can be searched without a warrant in the US
> (where most email companies are) unless you haven't read it and it is
> newer than 180 days.
It's worse than that. In a current case Microsoft is being sued by the
US to p
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 15:32 -0600, Bart wrote:
> > So download it to your own computer using fetchmail or offline IMAP
> mode
> > (or just dragging it between folders). IMAP doesn't force you to
> leave
> > it on a server. There is no feature of POP which IMAP does not also
> > have.
>
> Why perfo
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 13:27 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 05:01 -0600, Bart wrote:
> > > Why do people still use POP, when IMAP is a more
> > > complete solution and things like offline-imap and fetchmail exist
> > for
> > > those who work in an offline environment?
>
Bart wrote:
> > Why do people still use POP, when IMAP is a more
> > complete solution and things like offline-imap and fetchmail exist for
> > those who work in an offline environment?
> >
>
> They use POP because they do not want their mail residing on someone
> else's computer.
>
> I know i
Dear colleagues,
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 05:01 -0600, Bart wrote:
>
> They use POP because they do not want their mail residing on someone
> else's computer.
>
> I know it passes through other systems, but I have some messages that
> reside for long periods of time in various email folders for va
> Why do people still use POP, when IMAP is a more
> complete solution and things like offline-imap and fetchmail exist for
> those who work in an offline environment?
>
> P.
>
I prefer POP with Evolution because it is more stable for me than IMAP.
About half my accounts are POP and half are IM
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 05:01 -0600, Bart wrote:
> > Why do people still use POP, when IMAP is a more
> > complete solution and things like offline-imap and fetchmail exist
> for
> > those who work in an offline environment?
> >
>
> They use POP because they do not want their mail residing on som
> But, to inject a bit of controversy into this, is the usage of the very
> old POP protocol sufficient that the devs should spend time looking at
> this sort of issue?
Absolutely!
> Why do people still use POP, when IMAP is a more
> complete solution and things like offline-imap and fetchmail
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 09:39 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> But, to inject a bit of controversy into this, is the usage of the
> very
> old POP protocol sufficient that the devs should spend time looking at
> this sort of issue? Why do people still use POP, when IMAP is a more
> complete solution and t
> Yup. Fetchmail just sleeps however long the ...rc file requires and
> tries again. There appears to be a limit to how long fetchmail will
> wait for an appropriate reply from a server. From the man page:
>
> The timeout option allows you to set a server-nonresponse
> timeout
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 07:59 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 10:25 -0400, Marc Hurst wrote:
> > On 09/01/2014 04:41 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > > ...
> > > Evolution is reporting an error because the Yahoo servers are giving an
> > > error. This isn't an Evolution proble
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 10:25 -0400, Marc Hurst wrote:
> On 09/01/2014 04:41 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > ...
> > Evolution is reporting an error because the Yahoo servers are giving an
> > error. This isn't an Evolution problem as such - except in that when an
> > error occurs, Evolution assume
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 09:41 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > I've only seen one type of error, which appears in a red bar at the top
> > of the evolution window, typically when evolution asks for the POP
> > server's password:
> > Error while Fetching mail from 'jonr...@pacbell.net'.
> >
On 09/01/2014 04:41 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
I've only seen one type of error, which appears in a red bar at the top
of the evolution window, typically when evolution asks for the POP
server's password:
Error while Fetching mail from 'jonr...@pacbell.net'.
Cannot get POP summary:
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 12:29 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 02:04 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > Since August 15th when Fedora made its latest upgrade for evolution
> > available, evolution has been reporting a large number of failures
> > communicating with my POP server at A
> I've only seen one type of error, which appears in a red bar at the top
> of the evolution window, typically when evolution asks for the POP
> server's password:
> Error while Fetching mail from 'jonr...@pacbell.net'.
> Cannot get POP summary:
> > What do you get if you run Evo f
On Sun, 2014-08-31 at 19:45 +0200, Ángel González wrote:
> How often is evolution checking by pop? Does it always suceeds the first
> N times? Is it possible that you are being throttled by ATT?
Evolution polls every 3 minutes. Similarly, fetchmail polls every 180
seconds (3 minutes).
_
How often is evolution checking by pop? Does it always suceeds the first
N times? Is it possible that you are being throttled by ATT?
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://m
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 02:04 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Since August 15th when Fedora made its latest upgrade for evolution
> available, evolution has been reporting a large number of failures
> communicating with my POP server at ATT -- putting up a box requesting
> the server password about
Since August 15th when Fedora made its latest upgrade for evolution
available, evolution has been reporting a large number of failures
communicating with my POP server at ATT -- putting up a box requesting
the server password about 4 or 5 times per day. I have switched from
having evolution fetch
Hi Ralf,
On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 21:04 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> you've got a choice.
>
> For me it's much harder. I dislike KDE
Do you have a blog or such where ypu could post this?
Your distribution issues and your plans to move from ABC to XYZ feel
off-topic for this mailing list (which is
PPS:
I didn't read the whole thread, but I notice that your Evolution is
outdated. You might be satisfied again, if you update all your GTK/GNOME
software to current versions. IMO 3.10.2, the version I'm using, with
recent GTK/GNOME dependencies, is better, than what you're using. Still
not good e
> PS: I'm using Linux only for more than 10 years, so I guess I'm able to
> gauge the situation. I don't see anything good within the close future,
> when continuing GTK/GNOME based environments and applications.
^ using
>
> Hopefully YMMV!
__
On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 12:33 -0700, Bart wrote:
> So, I have no choice you see.
Hi Bart,
you've got a choice.
For me it's much harder. I dislike KDE, so while switching to KDE, to
get rid of all the buggy GNOME/GTK bugs, I not only will lose Evolution,
my favourite MUA, I'll also will lose a clea
On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 12:04 +, Pete Biggs wrote:>
I know I've seen a question like this before, so I did a quick search on
question with a reasonable answer. I was just going to send you the
identical question:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2013-May/msg00166.html
All I can sa
On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 02:42 -0700, Bart wrote:
> When I start evolution from a terminal, I get to see these errors.
> Well, actually warning messages. They continue every few seconds all
> the time it is running. Anyone know how I can correct this?
>
> evolution 3.8.5 on openSuse 12.3 using KDE
When I start evolution from a terminal, I get to see these errors.
Well, actually warning messages. They continue every few seconds all
the time it is running. Anyone know how I can correct this?
evolution 3.8.5 on openSuse 12.3 using KDE as a DM.
Bart
--
Hello Magne,
I have the same problem and until now did not find any solution. Did you
solve yours?
Cy
--
View this message in context:
http://gnome-evolution-general.1774414.n4.nabble.com/Errors-when-fetching-mail-from-many-accounts-tp4655316p4655593.html
Sent from the Gnome Evolution - Gener
>
>
> I do not get this error when download from 5 or fewer accounts. I
> should add that all accounts reside on the same mail server.
>
>
>
> I did not have this problem in Evolution 2.x (few weeks back) and
> therefore don't think the mail server is too slow in serving all POP
> requests si
I have configured 9 POP accounts in my Evolution settings, which probably
isn't unusual.
If I enable 6 or more account to fetch email, and press Send/Receive or
wait for the scheduled tasks to kick in, I get this error;
Error while Fetching Mail.
Failed to read a valid greeting from POP server su
Thufir wrote:
>
> I keep getting crashes preceeded by an error message:
>
> GConf error: Bad key or directory name: "x� Q_x": Must begin with a
> slash '/'
>
I've been getting this for the past week. It happens everytime I send an
e-mail which I sign with my GPG key. The error I get is:
8<
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:37:52 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 16:12 +, Thufir wrote:
>> I keep getting crashes preceeded by an error message:
>>
>> GConf error: Bad key or directory name: "x� Q_x": Must begin with a
>> slash '/'
>>
>> and am using gmail, if that matters. Is
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 16:12 +, Thufir wrote:
> I keep getting crashes preceeded by an error message:
>
> GConf error: Bad key or directory name: "x� Q_x": Must begin with a
> slash '/'
>
> and am using gmail, if that matters. Is there a log with more detail?
> Start evolution from the co
I keep getting crashes preceeded by an error message:
GConf error: Bad key or directory name: "x� Q_x": Must begin with a
slash '/'
and am using gmail, if that matters. Is there a log with more detail?
Start evolution from the console? I'm in Ubuntu 8.10 presently.
thanks,
Thufir
_
Steven,
I've been there too.
1) upgrade -- 2.24.x is fixed
or (I'm assuming you're in the in-box with view selected as unread)
2) use v-folder (search folder) with folder view = 'view all'.
Search filter is "all unread"
or
3) turn off "mark as read after N seconds" in mail pref's. , & use
Ctl-
When I double click on a single message (not using message preview) the
mail viewer opens, I see the message for a second and then the display
is a blank message / page.
If I go back and use the preview message (Ctrl-M) function I get the
split screen and can see the message fine. Can you tell me
Running Evolution 2.4.1 on Ubuntu Breezy
Recently lost ability to add or edit contacts, have not found any solution so far.
For grins decided to run Evo from a terminal and got the following messages:
adding hook target 'source'
(evolution:12201): camel-WARNING **: camel_exception_get_id c
57 matches
Mail list logo
