On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 22:21 +0200, Ángel González wrote: > On Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 22:19 +0200, Ángel González wrote: > > > Moreover, that emails can be searched without a warrant in the US > > > (where most email companies are) unless you haven't read it and it is > > > newer than 180 days. > > > > It's worse than that. In a current case Microsoft is being sued by the > > US to present email messages that are stored in its servers in Ireland: > > > > http://www.irishtimes.com/business/sectors/technology/eu-rebukes-us-over-microsoft-email-in-first-test-of-privacy-1.1850750 > > > > poc > > Thanks for the link, I didn't know about that case. I was however > thinking in the possibility of a case like that when writing 'email > companies' instead of 'emails'. It's hard to just give the point without > adding a big paragraph explaining for the many ramifications. :)
An update from yesterday: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/09/judge-mulls-contempt-charges-in-microsofts-e-mail-privacy-fight-with-us/ However this is getting OT so I'll leave it there. poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
