On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 15:35 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 13:26 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I thought RedHat were supporting you as an Evo developer.
>
> No problem, Red Hat really doesn't have anything to do with the Win32
> port I play with.
Actually I was referring
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 13:26 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I thought RedHat were supporting you as an Evo developer.
No problem, Red Hat really doesn't have anything to do with the Win32
port I play with. I saw awesome folks trying to port Evolution to
Windows and they did a great job, which
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 13:08 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> luckily Red Hat has nothing to do with it. Nothing at all. It's just
> my
> "free time fun with Evolution" (and WebKitGtk+, but do not ask,
> please).
Apologies Milan, I thought RedHat were supporting you as an Evo
developer.
poc
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 11:39 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 09:55 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > What was the rationale behind attempting to create a Windows
> > variant? Especially as it has always been said by the developers that it was
> > not practical since there was no
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 11:39 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 09:55 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I agree. Maybe I'm wrong but I suspect that RedHat's main
> justification
> for supporting Evo development is to be able to talk to Exchange
> servers from Linux. Porting it to Win
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 09:55 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > the current status is "it builds and can read IMAPx account
> > content",
> > but it still needs some real testing, like I'm pretty sure that
> > local
> > maildir structure will simply fail due to the file naming.
> I'm sorry if this sounds
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 09:55 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > the current status is "it builds and can read IMAPx account
> > content",
> > but it still needs some real testing, like I'm pretty sure that
> > local
> > maildir structure will simply fail due to the file naming.
> >
>
> I'm sorry if this
> the current status is "it builds and can read IMAPx account content",
> but it still needs some real testing, like I'm pretty sure that local
> maildir structure will simply fail due to the file naming.
>
I'm sorry if this sounds negative and slightly cynical, but a Windows
build of Evolution
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 18:02 +0300, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> I've seen some patches being pushed for Win32 support. Would there be
> any "status page showing where we are in having a functioning Win32
> build?
Hi,
the current status is "it builds and can read IMAPx account content",
but it st
Hi Pete,.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
>> I've seen some patches being pushed for Win32 support.
>
> Where have you seen those?
This one for example:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?id=9ab8c7d688170738d45513dfef1809fdfa5999b5
> Evolution for Windows *used
> I've seen some patches being pushed for Win32 support.
Where have you seen those?
> Would there be
> any "status page showing where we are in having a functioning Win32
> build? I looked around but could not find anything recent nor any
> downloadable executable.
>
Evolution for Windows *u
Hi,
I've seen some patches being pushed for Win32 support. Would there be
any "status page showing where we are in having a functioning Win32
build? I looked around but could not find anything recent nor any
downloadable executable.
I would love to use it instead of Thunderbird or Outlook on my
12 matches
Mail list logo
