Re: [Evolution] Update to 3.40.0 changed view

On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list wrote: > IMO updates shouldn't override/overwrite existing > views, at least an update should check, if a button already exists, > instead of adding a duplicate. Hi, the update doesn't do any such thing. The .ui files are v

Re: [Evolution] Update to 3.40.0 changed view

> > I was just surprised to see a duplicated button/icon after an update. A > button/icon that was seemingly considered as unneeded for several > releases by the developers, hence the "hack". > I think that would be better phrased as "I was delighted to see that the developers had found time to

Re: [Evolution] Update to 3.40.0 changed view

On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 15:34 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list wrote: > adding this icon by a "hack" was quite important a while ago, not > really > a "random customizations". I don't have a link to the email archive > at > hand. However, those who suffer from the same "hack" and don't > rememb

Re: [Evolution] Update to 3.40.0 changed view

On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:28 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:51 +0200, Andre Klapper via evolution-list > wrote: > > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list > > wrote: > > > seemingly the update from 3.38.4 to 3.40.0 changed the view chosen by > > > the

Re: [Evolution] Update to 3.40.0 changed view

On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:51 +0200, Andre Klapper via evolution-list wrote: > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list > wrote: > > seemingly the update from 3.38.4 to 3.40.0 changed the view chosen by > > the user, see attachment. I for example prefer one "force image" > >

Re: [Evolution] Update to 3.40.0 changed view

On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:51 +0200, Andre Klapper via evolution-list wrote: > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list > wrote: > > seemingly the update from 3.38.4 to 3.40.0 changed the view chosen by > > the user, see attachment. I for example prefer one "force image" > >

Re: [Evolution] Update to 3.40.0 changed view

On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list wrote: > seemingly the update from 3.38.4 to 3.40.0 changed the view chosen by > the user, see attachment. I for example prefer one "force image" > button, > over two buttons. IMO updates shouldn't override/overwrite existing > view

[Evolution] Update to 3.40.0 changed view

Hi, seemingly the update from 3.38.4 to 3.40.0 changed the view chosen by the user, see attachment. I for example prefer one "force image" button, over two buttons. IMO updates shouldn't override/overwrite existing views, at least an update should check, if a button already exists, instead of addi

Re: [Evolution] Update, commit, patch, workaround for new timezone?

El dom, 01-11-2020 a las 14:48 +0100, Andre Klapper via evolution-list escribió: > On Sun, 2020-11-01 at 12:34 +0100, aguador wrote: > > I took a quick look at Gnome bugzilla but saw nothing. > > GNOME Bugzilla has not been used for years to report new bugs. > Please read its big banner on top. >

Re: [Evolution] Update, commit, patch, workaround for new timezone?

On Sun, 2020-11-01 at 12:34 +0100, aguador wrote: > I took a quick look at Gnome bugzilla but saw nothing. GNOME Bugzilla has not been used for years to report new bugs. Please read its big banner on top. Cheers, andre -- Andre Klapper  |  ak...@gmx.net https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___

[Evolution] Update, commit, patch, workaround for new timezone?

A few days ago the new timezone package (2020d) hit Mageia Cauldron and date-dependent items (all appointments and tasks) in Evo 3.38.1 stopped being displayed. Apparently the new package dropped a file known as "pacificnew" which may be the cause of the problem according to word received indirect

Re: [Evolution] Evolution update and minor issues

On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 12:54 +0530, SanthanaKrishnan wrote: > 2.My mail backup is 12 GB. Regular backups take a lot of time. How do > I > split it from a particular date, retaining the folder structure. Evolution does not have a built-in system for partial or incremental backups. The File->Backup f

[Evolution] Evolution update and minor issues

Dear All, Thanks to support from the group we are slowly changing to ubuntu 14.04 LTS and evolution 3.10.4. Kindly advice on the following issues. 1.When the last mail on the inbox list is highlighted and when I move it into a folder, normally the highlight shifts to the previous mail. Now there

Re: [Evolution] update in ubuntu 12.04

On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 22:18 +0100, Erik Jurowiec wrote: > i cant update evolution mail in ubuntu 12.04. can anyone help me? thx. What does "update evolution mail" mean? And why? If you refer to getting a newer version of the application, please ask in an Ubuntu support channel if somebody can pac

Re: [Evolution] update in ubuntu 12.04

On 20 January 2014 21:18, Erik Jurowiec wrote: > i cant update evolution mail in ubuntu 12.04. can anyone help me? thx. > Without further explanation, no. Maybe ask on a Ubuntu list. poc ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To chan

[Evolution] update in ubuntu 12.04

i cant update evolution mail in ubuntu 12.04. can anyone help me? thx. erik ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] update package for ubuntu 12.10

On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 13:39 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > This is a good article if you want to start hacking/building/debugging - > > It at least covers some of the GNOME terminology. Just a warning, that author is heavily bia

Re: [Evolution] update package for ubuntu 12.10

On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 19:24 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 23:16 +0530, samarjit Adhikari wrote: > > If i believe correctly what ever the source being published at the > > following URL it will be picked by different distribution, right? > > http://projects.gnome.org/evolution/

Re: [Evolution] update package for ubuntu 12.10

On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 23:16 +0530, samarjit Adhikari wrote: > Could i get the latest Evolution code so that i can build it according > to my need? Yes, development takes place in the open. > If i believe correctly what ever the source being published at the > following URL it will be picked by d

Re: [Evolution] update package for ubuntu 12.10

>The Evolution team on this mailing list only publishes GNOME Evolution. Could i get the latest Evolution code so that i can build it according to my need? If i believe correctly what ever the source being published at the following URL it will be picked by different distribution, right? http://pro

Re: [Evolution] update package for ubuntu 12.10

On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 17:48 +0530, samarjit Adhikari wrote: > Anybody knows when ubuntu would release 12.10 update? You have to ask Ubuntu for that, as such decisions are done by Ubuntu. The Evolution team on this mailing list only publishes GNOME Evolution. If you want to know about third parties

[Evolution] update package for ubuntu 12.10

Anybody knows when ubuntu would release 12.10 update? I am not talking about 13.04 release , i am looking for time line when a software update will give me some bug fixes for ubuntu 12.10. With regards, Samarjit ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution

Re: [Evolution] Update on my spam problem

On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 15:38 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: > Every spam message has the same initial display which includes the same > unsubscribe option. When clicked you go to a web page that offers you a > chance to unsubscribe. You get s message that the unsubscription > process can take up to 3 d

[Evolution] Update on my spam problem

Every spam message has the same initial display which includes the same unsubscribe option. When clicked you go to a web page that offers you a chance to unsubscribe. You get s message that the unsubscription process can take up to 3 days. It is clear tat all this swpam cmes from one source. Unsub

Re: [Evolution] Eudora 7 Outbox mail migration to Evolution - Update

Hello Pete 1. Yes an email copied into the Sent folder where the Eudora Outbox emails were imported to does show the date normally in the message list. 2. Below is an email in its entirety that was imported from the Eudora Outbox and shows up in the Sent folder mailbox without any date info. One

Re: [Evolution] UPDATE evolution won't show email

On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 15:17 -0500, Eric Morey wrote: > On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 10:20 -0500, Eric Morey wrote: > > I stared experiencing the exact same behavior, suddenly after > > approximately 4 pm (EST) yesterday. > > Evolution is now showing new sub folders (each named '*') that while > empty we

Re: [Evolution] UPDATE evolution won't show email

On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 10:20 -0500, Eric Morey wrote: > I stared experiencing the exact same behavior, suddenly after > approximately 4 pm (EST) yesterday. Evolution is now showing new sub folders (each named '*') that while empty were not created by me. Currently there are '*' sub folders under 3

Re: [Evolution] Update on Sync issues

On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 09:53 +0100, Kåre Fiedler Christiansen wrote: > On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 11:03 +1100, Christopher M Bailey wrote: > > > > > One other question, is there a way to retrieve a stored password for an > > email account? > > Hi Chris. > > Evolution stores it's passwords in the Gno

Re: [Evolution] Update on Sync issues

On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 11:03 +1100, Christopher M Bailey wrote: > One other question, is there a way to retrieve a stored password for an > email account? Hi Chris. Evolution stores it's passwords in the Gnome keyring. You can find it under Applications->Accessories->Password and Encryption Ke

[Evolution] Update on Sync issues

Hi All, Thanks to everyone who helped me out with my Sync issues, and yes Milan it was an upgrade, the whole system was, starting with a fresh install of Fedora 10 then 11, 12, 13 and finally 14. I have since reinstalled the system on new hardware. One other question, is there a way to retrieve

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Update

On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 10:53 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: > I guess it has been close to a week now without any problems. Not a > single disconnect. Install it if you haven't already. Heh. Just this morning I ran into this bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532844 However, it appears

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Update

I guess it has been close to a week now without any problems. Not a single disconnect. Install it if you haven't already. On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 13:55 -0400, Axel wrote: > Art please also send an update - not that I dont trust Paul, but its > good to get re-verified by others too. I might move

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Update

gt; An: Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: evolution-list@gnome.org Gesendet: Freitag, den 30. Mai 2008, 00:44:14 Uhr Betreff: Re: [Evolution] Evolution Update Thanks. I'll give it a try. On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 12:51 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > With this package update, Evo Exchange on

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Update

Thanks. I'll give it a try. On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 12:51 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > With this package update, Evo Exchange on Hardy has been very stable > for > me. > -- Art Alexion MIS x3075 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part _

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Update

On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 11:12 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: > but experienced constant exchange disconnects after upgrading to hardy > (8.04) which installs evo 2.22.1. I think I've mentioned this before recently, but FYI: this was tracked down to a bug in OpenLDAP (which Evo Exchange uses to connect to

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Update

On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 07:54 -0400, Axel wrote: > Last weekend I switched from my Kubuntu 8.04 Setup to the Mandriva > 2008.1 Setup. I am using Evolution 2.22.0 and I have to say its works > better then my latest all backports on Kubuntu. > > I had one backend disconnect during the week. And I had

[Evolution] Evolution Update

Hey Team! Last weekend I switched from my Kubuntu 8.04 Setup to the Mandriva 2008.1 Setup. I am using Evolution 2.22.0 and I have to say its works better then my latest all backports on Kubuntu. I had one backend disconnect during the week. And I had one day with 2 freezes the other none or j

Re: [Evolution] Update

Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 14:46 -0500 schrieb Edwin Sorensen: > I'm Trying to update Evolution In opensuse 10.3 The update manager still > list evolution2.12 and will not go to 2.22.0 How can I update to 2.22.0 > there is no "official" evolution 2.22 for opensuse10.3. but there are some evolut

[Evolution] Update

I'm Trying to update Evolution In opensuse 10.3 The update manager still list evolution2.12 and will not go to 2.22.0 How can I update to 2.22.0 ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-li

[Evolution] updated dataserver, having errors in evolution update 2.8

I finally was able to update dataserver and now Ive moved to updating evolution. I ran ./configure --enable-evolution=yes and I recieved an error and it did not finish. Requested 'libexchange-storage-1.2 >= 1.7.90' but version of libexchange is 1.6.0 Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH enviro

[Evolution] [UPDATE] Evolution 2.8.1.1 released

Hi, Evolution 2.8.1.1 has been released as an update to the Evolution 2.8.1 release (GNOME 2.16 stable series) with fixes to a few critical bugs/regressions [ see details below]. You can download the source tarballs at http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/evolution/2.8/evolution-2.8.1.1.tar.b

Re: [Evolution] update to 2.4.2.1

Am Sonntag, den 12.03.2006, 18:26 -0800 schrieb Ron Eggler: (...removing a lot of unimportant lines...) > *** Configuring gtkhtml *** [1/3] > > ./autogen.sh --prefix /opt/evo --disable-static --disable-gtk-doc > You need to install the gnome-common module and make > sure the gnome-autogen.sh sc

Re: [Evolution] update to 2.4.2.1

Am Sonntag, den 12.03.2006, 17:21 -0700 schrieb Veerapuram Varadhan: On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 23:58 +, Ron Eggler wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to update my Evolution(crrently 2.2.1) for a while > now, with no luck. I'm trying it now again and hope to get help from > you guys... > Ok,

Re: [Evolution] update to 2.4.2.1

On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 23:58 +, Ron Eggler wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to update my Evolution(crrently 2.2.1) for a while > now, with no luck. I'm trying it now again and hope to get help from > you guys... > Ok, I've downloaded the sources because I don't really know how to > update by

[Evolution] update to 2.4.2.1

Hi, I've been trying to update my Evolution(crrently 2.2.1) for a while now, with no luck. I'm trying it now again and hope to get help from you guys... Ok, I've downloaded the sources because I don't really know how to update by redcarpet, I'm using suse 9.3 and it seems only to provide 2.2.1