On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 20:55 -0500, C de-Avillez wrote:
> In my case, not even that -- clicking on the down arrow at the
> attachment bar at the bottom of the email nicely presented it inline.
same here, for evo and mutt, ( not worth the effort to fire up tbird to
check )
_
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 21:47 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> This is the content of the attachement.dat -- all you have to do is
> save it and open it in an editor.
In my case, not even that -- clicking on the down arrow at the
attachment bar at the bottom of the email nicely presented it inline.
s
This is the content of the attachement.dat -- all you have to do is save it and
open it in an editor.
References:
In-Reply-To:
Received: from MUM-ITS-MAILGW2.monash.edu.my (59.191.192.17) by
MUM-ITS-MAILHC2.admin.monash.edu.my (59.191.192.20) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 8.1.
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 08:47 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 08:23 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> > not sure whether this is still viable or not or how old it actually is
> > or whether it's been incorporated into main etc
> >
> >
> > http://www.go-evolution.org/Tnef
>
> W
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 08:23 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> not sure whether this is still viable or not or how old it actually is
> or whether it's been incorporated into main etc
>
>
> http://www.go-evolution.org/Tnef
We do have a plugin for dealing with "application/ms-tnef" attachments.
Th
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 17:27 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 04:50 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 11:10 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > > Precisely. Should I file an enhancement request?
> >
> > No need. I just committed the feature for 2.29.2:
> > http://git.gn
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 17:27 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 04:50 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 11:10 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > > Precisely. Should I file an enhancement request?
> >
> > No need. I just committed the feature for 2.29.2:
> > http://git.gn
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 04:50 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 11:10 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Precisely. Should I file an enhancement request?
>
> No need. I just committed the feature for 2.29.2:
now that's cool
___
Evolution-list
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 04:50 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 11:10 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Precisely. Should I file an enhancement request?
>
> No need. I just committed the feature for 2.29.2:
> http://git.gnome.org/cgit/evolution/commit/?id=f43bc7ed11621ab41bbae861c81d4d
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 11:10 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> Precisely. Should I file an enhancement request?
No need. I just committed the feature for 2.29.2:
http://git.gnome.org/cgit/evolution/commit/?id=f43bc7ed11621ab41bbae861c81d4ddb8b5bb0ab
Matthew Barnes
___
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 23:02 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 09:18 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On a slightly related note, why is it that the Forward button doesn't
> > have a simple way for us to select whether to forward as an attachment
> > or inline? Not too difficult to go
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 09:18 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On a slightly related note, why is it that the Forward button doesn't
> have a simple way for us to select whether to forward as an attachment
> or inline? Not too difficult to go into the menus to change it, but
> wouldn't it be better to have
Hi all,
I get some unreadable .dat files when using evo-mapi to access my
exchange 2007 account, is this expected? Forwarding an example here.
On a slightly related note, why is it that the Forward button doesn't
have a simple way for us to select whether to forward as an attachment
or inline? No
13 matches
Mail list logo
