Re: [Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 10:10 +0530, Johnny Jacob wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 12:32 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > > Is it possible to keep the replies (sent out) > > it the folders under the mail that is replied to? > > Havn't found a setting as yet > > evolution-2.22.3.1-1.fc9.i386 > > > > Poss

Re: [Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-05 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 08:41 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 10:10 +0530, Johnny Jacob wrote: > > Possible by using search folders. Set up a search folder and in the > > criteria 'Include Threads' use 'All related' . > > Which doesn't work in 2.23.91 (with db-summary) at the moment

Re: [Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-04 Thread Milan Crha
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 10:10 +0530, Johnny Jacob wrote: > Possible by using search folders. Set up a search folder and in the > criteria 'Include Threads' use 'All related' . Which doesn't work in 2.23.91 (with db-summary) at the moment :) Milan ___

Re: [Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-04 Thread Johnny Jacob
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 12:32 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > Is it possible to keep the replies (sent out) > it the folders under the mail that is replied to? > Havn't found a setting as yet > evolution-2.22.3.1-1.fc9.i386 > Possible by using search folders. Set up a search folder and in the criteri

Re: [Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-04 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 16:16 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 15:52 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: > > > What I tend to dislike about Kmail are trivia such as the user > > > interface > > > (it seems fussier than Evo for some reason) plus the IMAP support > > has > > > in > > > the past

Re: [Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-04 Thread Art Alexion
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 15:52 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: > > What I tend to dislike about Kmail are trivia such as the user > > interface > > (it seems fussier than Evo for some reason) plus the IMAP support > has > > in > > the past not been so good, though that may have changed. > > I have two main

Re: [Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-04 Thread Art Alexion
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 14:47 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 12:34 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: > > It is another "conversation" to list what evo lacks. On the other > > hand, we could have a conversation on what evo does better, like > > exchange and html, both of which are

Re: [Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-04 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 12:34 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: > It is another "conversation" to list what evo lacks. On the other > hand, we could have a conversation on what evo does better, like > exchange and html, both of which are really weak in kmail. I couldn't care less about Exchange support, th

Re: [Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-04 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Do, 2008-09-04 at 10:45 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 12:32 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > > Is it possible to keep the replies (sent out) > > it the folders under the mail that is replied to? > > Havn't found a setting as yet > > evolution-2.22.3.1-1.fc9.i386 > > I do this b

Re: [Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-04 Thread Art Alexion
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 11:36 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 10:45 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 12:32 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > > > Is it possible to keep the replies (sent out) > > > it the folders under the mail that is replied to? > > > Havn't f

Re: [Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-04 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 10:45 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 12:32 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > > Is it possible to keep the replies (sent out) > > it the folders under the mail that is replied to? > > Havn't found a setting as yet > > evolution-2.22.3.1-1.fc9.i386 > > I do this

Re: [Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-04 Thread Steve T
I tend to do that with the folder rules. EG set up a folder called WORK that is to track messages to/from somecompany.com. Then in the rules for that folder say that you want it to record messages where the recipient or sender contains somecompany.com. I tend to make the rule work on specific folde

Re: [Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-04 Thread Art Alexion
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 12:32 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > Is it possible to keep the replies (sent out) > it the folders under the mail that is replied to? > Havn't found a setting as yet > evolution-2.22.3.1-1.fc9.i386 I do this by designating my inbox as my sent folder. It is not ideal if you h

Re: [Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-04 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 12:32 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > Is it possible to keep the replies (sent out) > it the folders under the mail that is replied to? > Havn't found a setting as yet > evolution-2.22.3.1-1.fc9.i386 No. But ... You can create a virtual folder for each correspondent of intere

[Evolution] Replies kept under op

2008-09-04 Thread Frank Murphy
Is it possible to keep the replies (sent out) it the folders under the mail that is replied to? Havn't found a setting as yet evolution-2.22.3.1-1.fc9.i386 Frank -- gpg id EB547226 Revoked Forgot Password :( Skype: Frankly3D http://www.frankly3d.com signature.asc Description: This is a dig