Re: [Evolution] OT: Warning message about HTML

2013-07-27 Thread erenoglu
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan [via Gnome Evolution - > > To summarize: follow the ground rules of the community you are > addressing. Yep, the thing is, my main motivation to use Evolution is to replace outlook and windows at work, so i have to play with the other employees'

Re: [Evolution] OT: Warning message about HTML

2013-07-27 Thread erenoglu
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Ralf Mardorf-2 [via Gnome Evolution - General] wrote: > It's a pity that Evolution usually does miss to automatically use the > wanted account :(. > > Forwarded Message > > On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 07:13 -0700, erenoglu wrote: >> I work at a multi-na

Re: [Evolution] OT: Warning message about HTML

2013-07-22 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 07:13 -0700, erenoglu wrote: [...] > I work at a multi-national and Outlook is the norm. The norm of > Outlook is top posting, and it's OK since reading mails with bottom > posting & quotes are tough when they are 10s of messages on a given > subject. Sometims you're forwarded

Re: [Evolution] OT: Warning message about HTML

2013-07-22 Thread Bart
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 11:35 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > It's a pity that Evolution usually does miss to automatically use the > wanted account :(. > I have gotten into the habit of checking the header info before I even completely decide what to type. I check the From, cause if I use the wrong

Re: [Evolution] OT: Warning message about HTML

2013-07-22 Thread Ralf Mardorf
It's a pity that Evolution usually does miss to automatically use the wanted account :(. Forwarded Message On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 07:13 -0700, erenoglu wrote: > I work at a multi-national and Outlook is the norm. Sure, if a multinational does something idiotic it's automatically

Re: [Evolution] OT: Warning message about HTML

2013-07-22 Thread erenoglu
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Bart Hollis [via Gnome Evolution - General] wrote: > On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 18:42 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> HTML for emails is completely useless and for many recipient a PITA. >> Note that HTML formatting often already gets lost by missing fonts and >> not ev

Re: [Evolution] OT: Warning message about HTML

2013-07-20 Thread Andre Klapper
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 18:42 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > HTML for emails is completely useless and for many recipient a PITA. There are obviously valid usecases for HTML mail, e.g. when I send emails with many long URLs and don't want to make people scroll to the footnotes at the bottom. The worl

Re: [Evolution] OT: Warning message about HTML

2013-07-20 Thread Bart Hollis
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 18:42 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > My apologies for the OT. Bart, I agree that Evolution shouldn't nanny > us, IOW if you want to use HTML and everything is set up to do so, then > Evolution shouldn't bother you by asking, if you're really sure. > > However, reconsider to wri

[Evolution] OT: Warning message about HTML

2013-07-19 Thread Ralf Mardorf
My apologies for the OT. Bart, I agree that Evolution shouldn't nanny us, IOW if you want to use HTML and everything is set up to do so, then Evolution shouldn't bother you by asking, if you're really sure. However, reconsider to write plain text mails only and use Evolutions "Performatted" featu