On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 10:00 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > Is there a specific reason why this doesn't happen automatically?
> > > So you can undelete stuff?
> > But it's moved to the trash can anyway?
>
> In Evo Trash is a virtual folder (like Junk). The messages are not
> physically c
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 13:01 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 07:39 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:30 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:56 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> > > > > BTW, if I press ^E, will this sync everyt
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 07:39 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:30 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:56 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> > > > BTW, if I press ^E, will this sync everything on the remote server?
> > >
> > > It will sync all the de
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:30 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:56 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> > > BTW, if I press ^E, will this sync everything on the remote server?
> >
> > It will sync all the deleted messages in the selected folder with the
> > server and Expunge th
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:56 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> > BTW, if I press ^E, will this sync everything on the remote server?
>
> It will sync all the deleted messages in the selected folder with the
> server and Expunge them
Is there a specific reason why this doesn't happen automatica
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 07:16 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
[snip]
> Unless I misunderstand what you're saying, you're moving it from
> somewhere remote to somewhere local, which is a big difference.
Yup. Locally. All 'journal'led (like you are in the offline mode and
replayed when back online)
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 07:16 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I'd still like a specific "Sync" action though, preferably per-server.
> AFAIK Send/Receive doesn't do it.
That's a nice concept actually. Make an option to select whether "sync"
only fetches new mail but also completely syncs all se
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:09 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:22 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
>
> > We had something in mind (and experimental code too) to solve this
> > issue. What happens when Evolution is 'shutdown' (closed/quit/whatever)
> > is that it tries to sync
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:22 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:10 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote:
> [snip]
> > BTW I suggest you never shutdown when important programs like evolution
> > are running. You better exit them first anyway. That's not because linux
> > would not be
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:22 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> We had something in mind (and experimental code too) to solve this
> issue. What happens when Evolution is 'shutdown' (closed/quit/whatever)
> is that it tries to sync up any changes made locally to the Remote IMAP
> server. We trie
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:10 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote:
[snip]
> BTW I suggest you never shutdown when important programs like evolution
> are running. You better exit them first anyway. That's not because linux
> would not be able to handle that (or similar), but simply because
> evolution (or any
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 14:01 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 10:31 -0600, Jeff Nelson wrote:
> > I shut down my notebook without first exiting evolution and that lead
> > to the new corruption. Deleting the index files caused new ones to be
> > generated.
>
> Why can't Linux handle
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 16:27 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 16:32 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Depends what you mean by "shut down". The shutdown utility on Linux
> > sends a signal which processes can trap and gives them a little time to
> > clean up. Only then does it ki
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 16:32 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> A different issue is what happens if you lose power or just close the
> laptop lid without warning. Not all Linux distros handle
> suspend-and-resume gracefully.
This is merely a matter of suspend-to-disk or suspend-to-ram actually
w
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 18:54 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > But Evo takes a long time to exit (30 seconds or so) as it waits until
> > exit time to purge and write out all mail folders. Most distros don't
> > give processes nearly this long to exit.
>
> True, and in fact some versions used
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 16:27 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 16:32 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Depends what you mean by "shut down". The shutdown utility on Linux
> > sends a signal which processes can trap and gives them a little time to
> > clean up. Only then does it ki
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 16:32 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Depends what you mean by "shut down". The shutdown utility on Linux
> sends a signal which processes can trap and gives them a little time to
> clean up. Only then does it kill them preemptively. A properly-written
> application should
Depends what you mean by "shut down". The shutdown utility on Linux
sends a signal which processes can trap and gives them a little time to
clean up. Only then does it kill them preemptively. A properly-written
application should never get into an inconsistent state because of the
system being shut
that's a question to ask the kernel hackers :)
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 14:01 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 10:31 -0600, Jeff Nelson wrote:
> > I shut down my notebook without first exiting evolution and that lead
> > to the new corruption. Deleting the index files caused new ones
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 10:31 -0600, Jeff Nelson wrote:
> I shut down my notebook without first exiting evolution and that lead
> to the new corruption. Deleting the index files caused new ones to be
> generated.
Why can't Linux handle this gracefully like Windows? On that OS when I
shut down all t
Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2005, 12:00 -0600 schrieb Jeff Nelson:
Unless I'm told this is not the right thing to do, I'm going to delete
the files
INBOX.ev-summary
INBOX.cmeta
INBOX.ibex.index
INBOX.ibex.index.data
and hope that they get regenerated after I rest
hi jeff,
Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2005, 12:00 -0600 schrieb Jeff Nelson:
> My original question has gone unanswered, so I've done some digging.
>
> 2. I poked around in ~/.evolution/mail/views and found four views
> related to my Inbox:
> The THIRD file has strange values for the expansion attribu
My original question has gone unanswered, so I've done some digging.
1. The web page at http://go-evolution.org/Camel.Local describes the
format of Mbox and maildir. The header "Mbox bugs" on this page seems to
describe the exact problem I'm having, but it doesn't explain how to fix it.
2. I
I'm running Evolution 2.4.1 on Ubuntu Breezy Badger. I had to kill and
restart Evolution due to a hang. Now I find that a lot (say, 50%) of my
messages in the Inbox are out of sync with the summary view in the main
Evolution window. That is, I'll click on a line that says it's an email
message
24 matches
Mail list logo
