On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Why should anyone on the list know that it means that? Very few of us
> compile Evo for ourselves or keep track of what is the latest version of
> the source (assuming that's what you're talking about). We use whatever
> comes with ou
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 23:03 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:07 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Now that you've explained that it's 3.13.x, we can see that it's an
> > unreleased version (the latest stable release currently being 3.12.2)
>
> Really?
>
> "[arch-general]
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:07 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Now that you've explained that it's 3.13.x, we can see that it's an
> unreleased version (the latest stable release currently being 3.12.2)
Really?
"[arch-general] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the
stable release v
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 15:41 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:14 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> > > I'm using Evolution with EWS self compiled on 22/06/2014.
> >
> > That means absolutely nothing to anyone else.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:14 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> > I'm using Evolution with EWS self compiled on 22/06/2014.
>
> That means absolutely nothing to anyone else. *Please* always give the
> version of Evo when asking a question (H
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:14 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> I'm using Evolution with EWS self compiled on 22/06/2014.
That means absolutely nothing to anyone else. *Please* always give the
version of Evo when asking a question (Help->About).
poc
___
evol
Hi,
I'm using Evolution with EWS self compiled on 22/06/2014.
It looks like the address collection when sending email does not work with
EWS. I don't see any collected addresses although I've sent many mails.
I've recognized this due to following issues on address lookup:
1) It takes too long ti