Hi *,
>On Sun, 2018-08-26 at 06:39 +, Gary Curtin wrote:
>> On 25/08/2018 22:43:46, "Japhering via evolution-list"
>> wrote:
>> I know its not what you want, but the quickest way to accomplish that is to
>> not respond at all and either a) manually put in the calendar entries or b)
>> route e
On Sun, 2018-08-26 at 06:39 +, Gary Curtin wrote:
> On 25/08/2018 22:43:46, "Japhering via evolution-list"
> wrote:
> I know its not what you want, but the quickest way to accomplish that is to
> not
> respond at all and either a) manually put in the calendar entries or b) route
> everything
On 25/08/2018 22:43:46, "Japhering via evolution-list"
wrote:
I know its not what you want, but the quickest way to accomplish that is to not
respond at all and either a) manually put in the calendar entries or b) route
everything through a gmail account which will put a notice in your gmail
ca
On Sat, 2018-08-25 at 00:37 +0200, Michael Hirmke wrote:
> Hi Joakim,
>
> [...]
> I want to accept it, because I want an entry in my calendar, but I don't
> want to inform the sender about that fact. One reason is, that I often
> have invitations for meetings taking place at the same time. I only
Hi Joakim,
[...]
>> I want to accept it, because I want an entry in my calendar, but I don't
>> want to inform the sender about that fact. One reason is, that I often
>> have invitations for meetings taking place at the same time. I only can
>> attend one of them, obviously. But I want to choose s
On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 12:02 +0200, Michael Hirmke wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is safe.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
> > If you want to be part of the appointment
On 24/08/2018 15:04:46, "Andre Klapper" wrote:
On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 10:19 +, Gary Curtin wrote:
Your situation is exactly "tentative", but you have no control over
the
organizer's understanding of the word. LOL!
It's not tentative (see the meaning of the word) as the user explicitly
do
On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 10:19 +, Gary Curtin wrote:
> Your situation is exactly "tentative", but you have no control over the
> organizer's understanding of the word. LOL!
It's not tentative (see the meaning of the word) as the user explicitly
does plan to attend the meeting.
I also ask you to
On 24/08/2018 12:02:00, "Michael Hirmke" wrote:
Hi,
[...]
If you want to be part of the appointment, why would you not want to
accept the wonderful facility that the originator used to include you?
I want to accept it, because I want an entry in my calendar, but I
don't
want to inform the
Hi,
[...]
>If you want to be part of the appointment, why would you not want to
>accept the wonderful facility that the originator used to include you?
I want to accept it, because I want an entry in my calendar, but I don't
want to inform the sender about that fact. One reason is, that I often
h
On 23/08/2018 11:13:17, "Andre Klapper" wrote:
Yes, as that is not the problem. It's about sending mail. Please read
the complete thread again to actually understand the actual problem.
There seems to be two different issues in the thread. This one, I think,
is not the same as the original pos
On Thu, 2018-08-23 at 08:36 +, Gary Curtin wrote:
> On 23/08/2018 10:29:55, "Andre Klapper" wrote:
>
> > There is nothing to "ignore". The user has to accept the invitation to
> > import the appointment to have it displayed in their calendar.
> >
>
> So then the users DOES want to be part o
On Thu, 2018-08-23 at 08:36 +, Gary Curtin wrote:
> So then the users DOES want to be part of the appointment.
Yes, as that is not the problem. It's about sending mail. Please read
the complete thread again to actually understand the actual problem.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
h
On 23/08/2018 10:29:55, "Andre Klapper" wrote:
There is nothing to "ignore". The user has to accept the invitation to
import the appointment to have it displayed in their calendar.
So then the users DOES want to be part of the appointment.
___
evo
On Thu, 2018-08-23 at 07:15 +, Gary Curtin wrote:
> On 22/08/2018 21:09:00, m...@mike.franken.de wrote:
> > I'd like to prohibit sending an answer even if the sender requests
> > one.
>
> I am wondering what is stopping you from just ignoring it and not
> replying? :-)
There is nothing to "i
On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 21:09 +0200, Michael Hirmke wrote:
> I'd like to prohibit sending an answer even if the sender requests
> one.
Hi,
feel free to file a feature request for evolution-ews at:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution-ews/issues/new
That way it won't get forgotten.
On 22/08/2018 21:09:00, m...@mike.franken.de wrote:
I'd like to prohibit sending an answer even if the sender requests one.
I am wondering what is stopping you from just ignoring it and not
replying? :-)
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-li
Hi Milan,
>On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 22:58 +0200, Michael Hirmke wrote:
>> I have the latest evo and evo ews versions, but I don't get a
>> checkbox or anything else to prohibit sending a response to the
>> sender of an invitation.
>> If I understand you correctly, I should have a checkbox like that?
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 22:58 +0200, Michael Hirmke wrote:
> I have the latest evo and evo ews versions, but I don't get a
> checkbox or anything else to prohibit sending a response to the
> sender of an invitation.
> If I understand you correctly, I should have a checkbox like that?
Hi,
I s
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 20:26 -0400, John Lewis wrote:
> It wasn't EWS, it was CalDAV. It is a good thing I am working on the
> new OS. It has Evolution 3.28.5-1.
Hi,
I do not recall CalDAV ever exhibiting anything like that what you
described in the initial email. Evolution only takes the i
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 08:07 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 18:51 -0400, John Lewis wrote:
> > It is was on the Day calendar.
>
> Hi,
> calendar type means On This Computer/CalDAV/EWS/ From what you
> wrote I guess you use evolution-ews. It's the serv
Hi Milan,
>On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 18:51 -0400, John Lewis wrote:
>> It is was on the Day calendar.
> Hi,
>calendar type means On This Computer/CalDAV/EWS/ From what you
>wrote I guess you use evolution-ews. It's the server which sends the
>invitation, not evolution(-ews) itself, though e
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 18:51 -0400, John Lewis wrote:
> It is was on the Day calendar.
Hi,
calendar type means On This Computer/CalDAV/EWS/ From what you
wrote I guess you use evolution-ews. It's the server which sends the
invitation, not evolution(-ews) itself, though evolution-ews ca
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 20:49 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 14:36 -0400, John Lewis wrote:
> > When every I receive an ical from someone and I add it to my
> > Evolution
> > Calender it silently emails everyone on the attendee list an invite
> > from me as if I made the ical.
>
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 14:36 -0400, John Lewis wrote:
> When every I receive an ical from someone and I add it to my Evolution
> Calender it silently emails everyone on the attendee list an invite
> from me as if I made the ical.
When this happens, did you enable or disable the "Send reply to send
When every I receive an ical from someone and I add it to my Evolution
Calender it silently emails everyone on the attendee list an invite
from me as if I made the ical.
To make things worse it silently changes the time of the meeting for
receivers as if it is setting it to UTC -1 when I am in UT
26 matches
Mail list logo
