On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 08:15 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 3/26/07, Matthew Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Exceptions to the rule have been made, however, and there is some talk
> > of whether it would make sense to upgrade the major desktop applications
> > (Firefox, OpenOffice, and E
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 11:28 -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I'm running Evolution 2.2.3 on Fedora Core 4. I have the same problem
> as many other people where my calender alerts are 1 hour off. I have
> seen many questions but no answers to this problem here or on the many
> forums I have looked in.
Hi Peter,
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 13:44 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 3/27/07, Srinivasa Ragavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you are on SLED10 or 10.1 or 10.2, then this is the bug you should be
> > looking into. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251573 There
> > is an update
On 3/27/07, Srinivasa Ragavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are on SLED10 or 10.1 or 10.2, then this is the bug you should be
> looking into. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251573 There
> is an update to Evolution 2.6.0 on SLED10.
"Access Denied
You are not authorized to acce
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:40 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 3/15/07, P Chenthill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >We are not currently doing much bug fixes in the version which
> > your using. Please upgrade your evolution to the latest stable version
> > which is evolution-2.1
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 08:15 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> OK, so the situations are analagous.
>
> I guess then, from my perspective (being a reseller/integrator trying
> to develop linux desktop offerings for customers) I would certainly
> vote to enable upgrade of "the major desktop application
On 3/26/07, Matthew Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exceptions to the rule have been made, however, and there is some talk
> of whether it would make sense to upgrade the major desktop applications
> (Firefox, OpenOffice, and Evolution) at some point before RHEL 6. I'm
> in favor of that; it
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 07:49 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 00:50 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> > so, are you suggesting that with RH enterprise desktop, that going
> > from one version of evo to another is possible and that RH provides
> > packages to do this?
No. RHEL
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 00:50 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 3/25/07, Matthew Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Newer stable releases of Evoluton tend to utilize newer features of the
> > GNOME developer platform as they become available. Upgrading from older
> > stable versions will like
On 3/25/07, Matthew Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Newer stable releases of Evoluton tend to utilize newer features of the
> GNOME developer platform as they become available. Upgrading from older
> stable versions will likely require you to also upgrade GNOME's core
> libraries such as GTK
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:40 -0500, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> I am amazed at the hutzpah of this answer, particularly given that Evo
> is so damned difficult to upgrade. It seems to be closely tied into
> the gnome desktop stuff, that upgrades outside of an entire desktop
> upgrade are ... impossible?
On 3/15/07, P Chenthill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>We are not currently doing much bug fixes in the version which
> your using. Please upgrade your evolution to the latest stable version
> which is evolution-2.10. It has all the latest timezone updates.
I am amazed at the hutz
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 02:55 -0600, P Chenthill wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>We are not currently doing much bug fixes in the version which
> your using. Please upgrade your evolution to the latest stable version
> which is evolution-2.10. It has all the latest timezone updates. Am
> currently workin
Thanks everyone for your responses! I finally got it running by copying
the /evolution-dataserver/zoneinfo from a Core 6 box that I use, to the
Core 4 box. I'll wait for the fix to update the 100 other Core 4 boxes
that I oversee. In response to the request to upgrade, I have posted my
effor
Hi Chris,
We are not currently doing much bug fixes in the version which
your using. Please upgrade your evolution to the latest stable version
which is evolution-2.10. It has all the latest timezone updates. Am
currently working on a fix for migrating timezones of meetings created
in past a
** Reply Requested by 3/16/2007 (Friday) **
Hi Chris,
It will be solved soon.Please keep in touch with this bug :-)
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301363
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 11:28 -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I'm running Evolution 2.2.3 on Fedora Core 4.
I'm running Evolution 2.2.3 on Fedora Core 4. I have the same problem
as many other people where my calender alerts are 1 hour off. I have
seen many questions but no answers to this problem here or on the many
forums I have looked in. Is there a fix for this or is the only
solution to wait until
17 matches
Mail list logo
