On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 09:05 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 13:36 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 12:45 -0500, William Case wrote:
> > > > Thanks Bill. If you do that please post the BZ number here so I can add
> > > > my 2 cents.
> > >
> > > http://
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 13:36 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 12:45 -0500, William Case wrote:
> > > Thanks Bill. If you do that please post the BZ number here so I can add
> > > my 2 cents.
> >
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570973
>
> OK, I added a "me to
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 12:45 -0500, William Case wrote:
> Hi Patrick
>
> On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 12:54 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 10:49 -0500, William Case wrote:
>
> > I don't know that a plugin is the best way (it strikes me as something
> > that everyone would wan
Hi Patrick
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 12:54 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 10:49 -0500, William Case wrote:
> I don't know that a plugin is the best way (it strikes me as something
> that everyone would want if it existed) but whatever works ...
>
I don't know if it is eit
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 10:49 -0500, William Case wrote:
> > BTW I requested this almost exactly four years ago. See
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271140. I see it's marked
> as
> > RESOLVED INVALID, which I presume means "we aren't going to do
> this".
> >
> I am not a programmer b
Patrick;
I thought I remembered seeing a bug for this a while ago.
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 23:47 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 20:15 -0500, William Case wrote:
> > Ahh ...
> >
> > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:41 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 20:15 -0500, William Case wrote:
> Ahh ...
>
> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:41 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:07 -0500, William Case wrote:
> > > Hi;
> > >
> > > Just re-posing a question about a request for an enhancement. Am I
> > > alone in wa
Ahh ...
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:41 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:07 -0500, William Case wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > Just re-posing a question about a request for an enhancement. Am I
> > alone in wanting this?
> >
> > I know there was a bug (request for enhancement) f
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:07 -0500, William Case wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Just re-posing a question about a request for an enhancement. Am I
> alone in wanting this?
>
> I know there was a bug (request for enhancement) filed against Evolution
> requesting an undo key or Edit tab undo for flagging read/un
Hi;
Just re-posing a question about a request for an enhancement. Am I
alone in wanting this?
I know there was a bug (request for enhancement) filed against Evolution
requesting an undo key or Edit tab undo for flagging read/unread mail.
It shouldn't be difficult. If it went back 5 -20 read flag
10 matches
Mail list logo