Re: [Evolution] Ctl-Z = undo, Please !!

2009-02-09 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 09:05 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 13:36 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 12:45 -0500, William Case wrote: > > > > Thanks Bill. If you do that please post the BZ number here so I can add > > > > my 2 cents. > > > > > > http://

Re: [Evolution] Ctl-Z = undo, Please !!

2009-02-09 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 13:36 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 12:45 -0500, William Case wrote: > > > Thanks Bill. If you do that please post the BZ number here so I can add > > > my 2 cents. > > > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570973 > > OK, I added a "me to

Re: [Evolution] Ctl-Z = undo, Please !!

2009-02-08 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 12:45 -0500, William Case wrote: > Hi Patrick > > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 12:54 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 10:49 -0500, William Case wrote: > > > I don't know that a plugin is the best way (it strikes me as something > > that everyone would wan

Re: [Evolution] Ctl-Z = undo, Please !!

2009-02-08 Thread William Case
Hi Patrick On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 12:54 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 10:49 -0500, William Case wrote: > I don't know that a plugin is the best way (it strikes me as something > that everyone would want if it existed) but whatever works ... > I don't know if it is eit

Re: [Evolution] Ctl-Z = undo, Please !!

2009-02-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 10:49 -0500, William Case wrote: > > BTW I requested this almost exactly four years ago. See > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271140. I see it's marked > as > > RESOLVED INVALID, which I presume means "we aren't going to do > this". > > > I am not a programmer b

Re: [Evolution] Ctl-Z = undo, Please !!

2009-02-07 Thread William Case
Patrick; I thought I remembered seeing a bug for this a while ago. On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 23:47 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 20:15 -0500, William Case wrote: > > Ahh ... > > > > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:41 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at

Re: [Evolution] Ctl-Z = undo, Please !!

2009-02-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 20:15 -0500, William Case wrote: > Ahh ... > > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:41 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:07 -0500, William Case wrote: > > > Hi; > > > > > > Just re-posing a question about a request for an enhancement. Am I > > > alone in wa

Re: [Evolution] Ctl-Z = undo, Please !!

2009-02-06 Thread William Case
Ahh ... On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:41 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:07 -0500, William Case wrote: > > Hi; > > > > Just re-posing a question about a request for an enhancement. Am I > > alone in wanting this? > > > > I know there was a bug (request for enhancement) f

Re: [Evolution] Ctl-Z = undo, Please !!

2009-02-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:07 -0500, William Case wrote: > Hi; > > Just re-posing a question about a request for an enhancement. Am I > alone in wanting this? > > I know there was a bug (request for enhancement) filed against Evolution > requesting an undo key or Edit tab undo for flagging read/un

[Evolution] Ctl-Z = undo, Please !!

2009-02-06 Thread William Case
Hi; Just re-posing a question about a request for an enhancement. Am I alone in wanting this? I know there was a bug (request for enhancement) filed against Evolution requesting an undo key or Edit tab undo for flagging read/unread mail. It shouldn't be difficult. If it went back 5 -20 read flag