Hi Patrick On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 12:54 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 10:49 -0500, William Case wrote:
> I don't know that a plugin is the best way (it strikes me as something > that everyone would want if it existed) but whatever works ... > I don't know if it is either. I suggested plugin simply to help overcome resistance because of a perceived lack of demand in the main program. I have phrased things differently in the bug submission. > > I will re-file a Request For Enhancement this evening or tomorrow > > morning. Evolution is now in the hands of Gnome programmers, there > > are > > probably new people who can see the benefit of an 'undo' enhancement > > for > > 'delete' and 'read' and perhaps this request will get more user > > support. > > Thanks Bill. If you do that please post the BZ number here so I can add > my 2 cents. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570973 > BTW, this isn't the first time we've discussed this :-) See > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2005-November/msg00371.html et > seq. Also > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2007-October/msg00185.html et > seq. > > poc > Yes. I remember those exchanges. It just proves that the lack of 'undo' continues over a long period to annoy us both. -- Regards Bill Fedora 10, Gnome 2.24.3 Evo.2.24.3, Emacs 22.2.1 _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
