On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 09:43 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> Something has been bothering me about this thread: it doesn't ring true
> to me! So I've just done some experiments. I've got Evo (2.24.2)
> running on my F10 box and Outlook2007 running on a Vista machine next to
> it. Both are looking at
Something has been bothering me about this thread: it doesn't ring true
to me! So I've just done some experiments. I've got Evo (2.24.2)
running on my F10 box and Outlook2007 running on a Vista machine next to
it. Both are looking at the same Inbox via IMAP.
I can delete a message in Evo, and
>
> More frequent updates, even immediate updates of status chagnes
> (reads/deletes) means less wierdness.
No, it would just make the weirdness happen more often.
If on client A you delete a message, that change would be sync'd.
Client B, where the message hasn't been deleted, would then sync
>
> The option of an explicit "synch" action could help the smarter user
> avoid the problem if used properly, and it would certainly be a
> convenience to have, but it still wouldn't be automatic. The best way to
> avoid the issue at present is by not allowing it to arise, i.e. by not
> having A
I understand. Anytime two clients are accessing the same folder there
will be all sorts of wierdness.
My point is this:
More frequent updates, even immediate updates of status chagnes
(reads/deletes) means less wierdness.
I can't imagine why we would want evolution to wait hours and hours to
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 11:25 -0800, David Graves wrote:
> If Evolution would always update on writes, then It could have a "server
> is always right" policy to incorporate changes made by other clients.
By "writes" I assume you mean "actions which change the user's view of
the mailstore and should
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:30 -0500, Internaut at Large wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:25 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:35 -0800, David Graves wrote:
> > > I leave evolution open on my home machine and head to work. I read and
> > > delete emails al
Greetings,
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:25 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:35 -0800, David Graves wrote:
> > I leave evolution open on my home machine and head to work. I read and
> > delete emails all day at work. I come home to find all my messages
> > unread at home and
If Evolution would always update on writes, then It could have a "server
is always right" policy to incorporate changes made by other clients.
I'm less concerned about my home machine not seeing changes made while
I'm at work
I am more bothered by the fact that my iPhone alerts me to unread
messa
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:35 -0800, David Graves wrote:
> I leave evolution open on my home machine and head to work. I read and
> delete emails all day at work. I come home to find all my messages
> unread at home and if I do anything except close evolution
> immediately,
> it undeletes all the del
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:35 -0800, David Graves wrote:
> Pretty please, with sugar on top, update the fscking folder once in a
> while
I'm not saying that you're wrong but FYI the way I have developed to
keep this from burning me is:
I go through my Junk folder regularly, including before I l
How many years have we been living with this?
I leave evolution open on my home machine and head to work. I read and
delete emails all day at work. I come home to find all my messages
unread at home and if I do anything except close evolution immediately,
it undeletes all the deleted mail and mark
12 matches
Mail list logo
