Jules Colding wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 00:04 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 23:49 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> You can use OWA (the "real" one or evolution-exchange), POP3, IMAP or
> MAPI. The CLA doesn't care and you have to pay the exact same license
> fee indepen
Pete Biggs wrote:
>> Something that can be made to work with the Exchange instead of going
>> through the Outlook Web Access which basically makes working with
>> Exchange a total PITA. This is a productivity killer.
>>
>>
>
> I know nothing about Exchange, but I was under the impression that
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 19:05 -0500, Don Levey wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 10:01 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > I've been struggling with CalDAV and Evolution for a while now. I've
> > had some minor successes but, in general, I can not get it to work
> > reliably.
> >
> > I've tried various serve
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 10:01 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I've been struggling with CalDAV and Evolution for a while now. I've
> had some minor successes but, in general, I can not get it to work
> reliably.
>
> I've tried various servers, including Cosmo, RSCDS and Bedework (all at
> various versio
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 10:33 +0100, Jules Colding wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 00:04 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 23:49 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > > >
> > > >Something that can be made to work with the Exchange instead of going
> > > >through the Outlook Web Acces
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 00:04 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 23:49 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > >
> > >Something that can be made to work with the Exchange instead of going
> > >through the Outlook Web Access which basically makes working with
> > >Exchange a total PITA.
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 23:49 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> >Something that can be made to work with the Exchange instead of going
> >through the Outlook Web Access which basically makes working with
> >Exchange a total PITA. This is a productivity killer.
> >
> >
>
> I know nothing about Exch
>
>Something that can be made to work with the Exchange instead of going
>through the Outlook Web Access which basically makes working with
>Exchange a total PITA. This is a productivity killer.
>
>
I know nothing about Exchange, but I was under the impression that the only
way a non-Windows
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 14:42 -0700, Robin Laing wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:02 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> >> On 2/16/07, Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> While I understand the need for an Exchange client
> >>> under Linux, I can't h
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:02 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote:
>> On 2/16/07, Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> While I understand the need for an Exchange client
>>> under Linux, I can't help wondering how much this distracts developer
>>> attention from
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:02 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 2/16/07, Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > While I understand the need for an Exchange client
> > under Linux, I can't help wondering how much this distracts developer
> > attention from the rest of Evo.
>
> >From th
On 2/16/07, Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I understand the need for an Exchange client
> under Linux, I can't help wondering how much this distracts developer
> attention from the rest of Evo.
>From the perspective of hoping to drive Linux desktop adoption into
the corpor
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 10:35 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> ps Can I just say that I *don't* use Exchange in any form whatsoever -
> if the recent traffic on this list is to be believed, I seem to be
> unique :-)
Or the Exchange users just have more problems than the rest of us :-)
The number of Exch
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 17:12 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 10:35 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> > >
> > > So *is* anyone using CalDAV successfully on Evo? If so what server &
> > > versions do you use? All I want to do is to read and update a personal
> > > calendar fro
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 10:35 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> There hasn't been any replies to this - so can I assume that no one
> has successfully got CalDAV working?
FWIW we came to the same conclusion and decided to postpone the whole
thing for a year and then review the situation again.
We only tes
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 10:01 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I've been struggling with CalDAV and Evolution for a while now. I've
> had some minor successes but, in general, I can not get it to work
> reliably.
>
> I've tried various servers, including Cosmo, RSCDS and Bedework (all at
> various versio
I've been struggling with CalDAV and Evolution for a while now. I've
had some minor successes but, in general, I can not get it to work
reliably.
I've tried various servers, including Cosmo, RSCDS and Bedework (all at
various version levels) and Evolution 2.4.x, 2.6.x and 2.8.x. I managed
to ge
17 matches
Mail list logo
