On 2021-03-20 at 12:03 -0400, George Reeke wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-03-20 at 00:21 +0100, Ángel wrote:
> > On 2021-03-18 at 09:42 -0400, George Reeke wrote:
> > > Milan, thanks for letting me know it's fixed, it is easy enough
> > > to click the middle button instead (really a scroll wheel, that's
> >
On Sat, 2021-03-20 at 00:21 +0100, Ángel wrote:
> On 2021-03-18 at 09:42 -0400, George Reeke wrote:
> > Milan, thanks for letting me know it's fixed, it is easy enough
> > to click the middle button instead (really a scroll wheel, that's
> > why I was avoiding it). --trimmed--
>
> Is it happening
On 2021-03-18 at 09:42 -0400, George Reeke wrote:
> Milan, thanks for letting me know it's fixed, it is easy enough
> to click the middle button instead (really a scroll wheel, that's
> why I was avoiding it). As for "ancient", well, this is standard
> on CentOS 7, which is supported until 2024 an
On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 08:16 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> Hi,
> your version is really ancient. There will be released 3.40.0 stable
> series shortly (tomorrow). It's a very long gap between 3.28.5 and
> 3.40.0.
>
> On a good side, this had been fixed meanwhile, I cannot re
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 21:00 -0400, George Reeke wrote:
> > I also have Centos 7 with mate desktop using evolution 3.28.5
> > (3.28.5-10.el7) and it works fine for me. I do not clink into the
> > cc
> > field Just hover over it and paste.
> >
> > Ron
>
> [For some reason, CTRL-L does not work with
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 14:04 -0400, George Reeke wrote:
> I will report it unless somebody on this list tells
> me it's really a great feature or my recent version is too ancient.
Hi,
your version is really ancient. There will be released 3.40.0 stable
series shortly (tomorrow). It's a very
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 18:11 +, Ronald Tidwell @CA wrote:
> I also have Centos 7 with mate desktop using evolution 3.28.5
> (3.28.5-10.el7) and it works fine for me. I do not clink into the cc
> field Just hover over it and paste.
>
> Ron
[For some reason, CTRL-L does not work with your messag
hurt sending
this E-Mail.
-Original Message-
From: George Reeke
mailto:george%20reeke%20%3cre...@rockefeller.edu%3e>>
Reply-To: re...@rockefeller.edu<mailto:re...@rockefeller.edu>
To: evolution-list@gnome.org<mailto:evolution-list@gnome.org>
Subject: [Evolution] Bug copyin
Dear colleagues,
Evolution 3.28.5 (Current CentOS 7 release, MATE desktop).
This looks like a bug, and I will report it unless somebody
on this list tells me it's really a great feature or my
recent version is too ancient. The situation:
I am writing a new email and already have "To:" filled in.
Hi,
On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 14:27 +0100, Guy via evolution-list wrote:
> Bonjour, j'ai un "bug" sur calendrier d'évolution, il me demande tout
> le temps le mot de passe du compte.
> (je suis sur que c'est le bon mot de passe). c'est comme si il ne
> l'enregistrait pas.
> et pourtant je peux pourtan
Bonjour, j'ai un "bug" sur calendrier d'évolution, il me demande tout
le temps le mot de passe du compte.
(je suis sur que c'est le bon mot de passe). c'est comme si il ne
l'enregistrait pas.
et pourtant je peux pourtant l'ouvrir (avec évolution).
merci de m'aider.
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:02 -0500, steve Interdonato wrote:
> When you change (add/remove) inbox title columns to say sender (which
> you want to see of course who sent you the email) Evolution also
> changes the Sent folder title to the same as the inbox title. And
> visa versa, if you change the
where is that option called; "Apply the same view settings to all folders"?
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 21:19 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> "Apply the same view settings to all folders"___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your lis
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:02 -0500, steve Interdonato wrote:
> When you change (add/remove) inbox title columns to say sender (which
> you want to see of course who sent you the email) Evolution also
> changes the Sent folder title to the same as the inbox title. And
> visa versa, if you change the
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:02 -0500, steve Interdonato wrote:
>
> When you change (add/remove) inbox title columns to say sender (which you
> want to see of course who sent you the email) Evolution also changes the
> Sent folder title to the same as the inbox title. And visa versa, if you
> change
When you change (add/remove) inbox title columns to say sender (which you want
to see of course who sent you the email) Evolution also changes the Sent folder
title to the same as the inbox title. And visa versa, if you change the sent
folder it changes the title column headers in the inbox folder
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 19:56 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>
>
> > (spamassassin tests for lots of issues with the HELO string - one of
> > them is for a "bare IP" address, another for "numeric HELO".)
>
> This is exactly the type of the information I'm looking for. I do not
> know all the consequence
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 19:10 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 19:56 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > > I don't really want to comment on the bug) but would err on the
> > > side of leaving things as they are - it just looks less spammy.
> >
> > Is 'err' a typo? I'm afraid I do
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 19:56 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I don't really want to comment on the bug) but would err on the side
> > of leaving things as they are - it just looks less spammy.
>
> Is 'err' a typo? I'm afraid I do not follow, if not.
"To err" is correct English for "to make a mistake
Hi,
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 17:59 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I personally wouldn't be excessively worried either way (which is why
> I don't really want to comment on the bug) but would err on the side
> of leaving things as they are - it just looks less spammy.
Is 'err' a typo? I'm afraid
>
> Anyway, I would like to ask other evolution-list members to join the
> bug [2] and express their opinion there, if they have any, want to and
> can. I agree with Josh that the local machine name exposure is not
> always expected, even just in the tracking headers, which can be used
> to searc
Hi,
I'm adding evolution-list back into the loop. We had several private
exchanges with Josh, initiated by him. I'm not going to copy here all
we exchanged, most of that was just a noise. I have a plea for the
evolution-list members at the end, which is the 'why' for going back
into the pub
On Saturday, September 30, 2017 11:30 AM, Berend De Schouwer
wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 17:06 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:13 AM, Pete Biggs > k> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > ps BTW, the senders IP address is usually inserted by the MTA, not
>
On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 17:06 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
>
> On Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:13 AM, Pete Biggs k> wrote:
>
>
> > ps BTW, the senders IP address is usually inserted by the MTA, not
> > the
> > MUA in the headers. Good luck with getting that changed.
>
> Pete,
>
On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 17:06 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> You probably haven't read anything I've said before.
Hi Josh,
please see https://wiki.gnome.org/Foundation/CodeOfConduct
Thank you! :)
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
On Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:13 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
> ps BTW, the senders IP address is usually inserted by the MTA, not the
> MUA in the headers. Good luck with getting that changed.
Pete,
You probably haven't read anything I've said before.
IP address is inserted by thunderbird MUA
On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 21:41 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> No recipient needs to know neither sender's workstation IP address
> nor its real host name.
Normally, headers don't contain the "sender's workstation IP address"
unless the sender's MUA inserts it as a body header, and more o
>
>
> No recipient needs to know neither sender's workstation IP address
> nor its real host name.
>
I would disagree with that. The headers are mainly there for debugging
and auditing not for "informing" the end recipient - putting bogus
information in those headers just negates their primary
Here is the patch
diff -up
evolution-data-server-3.24.6/src/camel/providers/smtp/camel-smtp-transport.c.orig
evolution-data-server-3.24.6/src/camel/providers/smtp/camel-smtp-transport.c
---
evolution-data-server-3.24.6/src/camel/providers/smtp/camel-smtp-transport.c.orig
2017-09-27 19:06:32
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 10:31 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 09:53 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
>> Where is the function responsible for helo message?
> Hi,
> it's here:
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution-data-server/tree/src/camel/providers/smtp/camel-sm
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 09:53 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> Where is the function responsible for helo message?
Hi,
it's here:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution-data-server/tree/src/camel/providers/smtp/camel-smtp-transport.c?h=gnome-3-24#n1388
> PS. The fact that pretty
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 2:31 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 17:30 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
>> local IP is better.
> Hi,
> maybe. It still exposes some details about the network, like what
> internal IP range is in use.
exposing internal range is much safe
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 17:30 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> local IP is better.
Hi,
maybe. It still exposes some details about the network, like what
internal IP range is in use.
I just tried with a Google account and the first Received header
contains "localhost.localdomain"
On Monday, September 25, 2017 3:41 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 17:36 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
>> Sent from evolution:
>> Received: from [external IP] ([external IP:port]
>> helo=myhost.mydomain.ext)
>>
>> Sent from thunderbird:
>> Received: from [external IP
On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 17:36 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> Sent from evolution:
> Received: from [external IP] ([external IP:port]
> helo=myhost.mydomain.ext)
>
> Sent from thunderbird:
> Received: from [external IP] ([external IP:port] helo=[local IP])
Hi,
what is better on
On 09/22/2017 04:54 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 14:10 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
>
>> Greetings to evolution team!
>> Just today I wanted to start using the program but uncovered a stopper,
>> listed in subject.
>> To my huge surprise it has been report
On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 14:10 -0400, d18jf9...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> Greetings to evolution team!
>
> Just today I wanted to start using the program but uncovered a stopper,
> listed in subject.
> To my huge surprise it has been reported almost three years ago and still
> completely ignored.
Greetings to evolution team!
Just today I wanted to start using the program but uncovered a stopper, listed
in subject.
To my huge surprise it has been reported almost three years ago and still
completely ignored.
Josh.
___
evolution-list mailing list
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 10:34 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773311
>
> It's already reported as #757504
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757504
>
> and discussed on this list starting at
>
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution
Thank you for the info.
I hope that will be fixed :)
Le lundi 20 février 2017 à 10:34 +, Pete Biggs a écrit :
> >
> >
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773311
>
> It's already reported as #757504
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757504
>
> and discussed on thi
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773311
It's already reported as #757504
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757504
and discussed on this list starting at
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2016-September/msg00195.html
A workaround is to change the line w
Hello,
I use Evolution 3.20.5 (Fedora 24) and if I copy / paste a relatively
long url in the editor Evolution only convert it to a http link until
the line break.
For exemple if I copy / paste this link (the "x" represent where line
break in Evolution)
http://test.com/ddd
Dear Angel, dear Milan,
thank you for pointing this out. The time zone is Europe/Berlin. And
indeed, according to wikipedia, there was no DST in Germany from 1950
to 1980.
So, it's a flaming mess. On the other hand, I would expect a birthday to
be a full calendar day, no matter at what time it s
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 14:12 +0100, Herr Oswald wrote:
> On my 3.16.0, ubuntu 15.04, I've got the same problem.
> Could this be related to a well-known ubuntu bug:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/100
> 0182
Hi,
I do not use that indicator-datetime, but
On my 3.16.0, ubuntu 15.04, I've got the same problem.
Could this be related to a well-known ubuntu bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1000182
?
W
Am Freitag, den 27.11.2015, 08:11 +0100 schrieb Milan Crha:
> On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 00:11 +0100, Rolf Würtz wro
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 00:11 +0100, Rolf Würtz wrote:
> However, if the person is 67 or older, the birthday gets displayed
> the day before at 23:00.
Hi,
it's basically this:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748465
which leads to this:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Rolf Würtz wrote:
> However, if the person is 67 or older, the birthday gets displayed
> the day before at 23:00.
>
> Is there any reason behind it, am I doing something wrong, or is
> it simply a bug?
>
> Best
>
> Rolf
Seems timezone related. Either with being born in Summer/Winter time,
or
Hi,
I am talking about evolution 3.12.9, the latest version on
Linux Mint Debian Edition
it is nice that the birthdays of your contacts get displayed
in a special calendar named "Birthdays and Anniversaries".
However, if the person is 67 or older, the birthday gets displayed
the day before at 2
I opened a bug about many icons looking old.
I made a proposal to replace it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757818
All comment are welcome :)
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscri
Dario Lesca wrote:
>
> > > (NOTE: enable the external editor it's not a valid solution)
> >
> > Ah. I found this note down here but somehow the reasons why "it's
> not
> > a valid solution" seem to have gotten lost. :(
> The reason are many, I have set external editor to "gedit", and the
> html
Il giorno mar, 13/10/2015 alle 14.28 +0200, Andre Klapper ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 14:25 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> > But why it's not possible remove webkit editor and restore the old
> > build-in editor?
>
> As I wrote: You can, by going back to version 3.12.
>
> In 3.16 and later t
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 14:25 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> But why it's not possible remove webkit editor and restore the old
> build-in editor?
As I wrote: You can, by going back to version 3.12.
In 3.16 and later the entire ancient rotting GtkHtml editor codebase
has been replaced by an editor cod
Il giorno mar, 13/10/2015 alle 07.53 -0400, Paul Smith ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 12:54 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > > What is the difficulty to remove the bugs
> >
> > The difficulty is that manpower is limited. Your patches are highly
> > welcome to fix problems faster.
>
> The best
Il giorno mar, 13/10/2015 alle 12.54 +0200, Andre Klapper ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 12:16 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749712
> >
> > This is a very old, annoying and serious bug.
>
> It's only a few months old. I can offer your bug reports wh
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 12:54 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > What is the difficulty to remove the bugs
>
> The difficulty is that manpower is limited. Your patches are highly
> welcome to fix problems faster.
The best thing to do is to go help the WebKit folks, and/or follow the
bug there as menti
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 12:16 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749712
>
> This is a very old, annoying and serious bug.
It's only a few months old. I can offer your bug reports which are more
than 10 years old. Age is irrelevant when discussing issues.
Annoying
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749712
This is a very old, annoying and serious bug.
It's not possible to restore the previous version of editor component?
For compose a new message or a reply-to in html mode I must do very
attention for type and delete some test. In many cases, if I
reopen 795287
thanks
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 17:10 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 10/09/15 16:33, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 14:55 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > Removing that account in preferences and setting it up again does
> > > not feel nice, even if the gmail acco
On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 13:18 +0200, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu wrote:
> Except that I've lost my few (not very important) calendar
> information.
Hi,
[side note: top-posting is considered 'bad' on this mailing list]
You can import also calendars, check the content of the old version of
~/
Hi,
Sorry for the later posting error. That's the default behavior of my
webmail client. I forgot to check recipient.
Now I've been able to set up accounts, and I'm in the (long and tedious)
process of importing back all the old mboxes I had, one after another.
I'd say that all this ends-up well
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 14:55 +0200, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu wrote:
> If I'm understanding correctly your advice, the best would be to get
> ride of the old data. And then importing again in a newly configured
> evolution. If that's right, I'm intending to proceed the following
> way :
> 1) Moving a
Thank you Milan and Patrick for help.
After witnessing no message with strace -p, I've killed evolution main
process and subprocesses (evolution-sourc.., evolution-alarm,
evolution-calen...).
A weird detail is I have no ~/.evolution.
All I can find in my home are the following : ""
~ $ find . -n
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 14:07 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Size of the mailstore
> > * I'm not sure of the mailstore location. Here is what I currently have on
> > disk :
> > $ du -ms .local/share/evolution/mail/ .config/evolution/mail/
> > 3500.local/share/evolution/mail/
> > 2 .c
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 13:06 +0200, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for your answer. Here are more in formations corresponding to
> your questions. Please, do not hesitate to ask many more. I'm very grateful
> for any kind of help and then very willing to fully collaborate.
>
Hello,
Thank you for your answer. Here are more in formations corresponding to
your questions. Please, do not hesitate to ask many more. I'm very grateful
for any kind of help and then very willing to fully collaborate.
Process running ?
* To be able to use my computer, I have to SIGSTOP the proc
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:40 +0200, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently upgraded my evolution (and gnome, and gtk, and so on) from
> the older version 2 to version 3 ; precisely I've installed evolution
> 3.10.4-r1 from gentoo.
>
> At startup evolution has asked to transition
Hello,
I've recently upgraded my evolution (and gnome, and gtk, and so on) from
the older version 2 to version 3 ; precisely I've installed evolution
3.10.4-r1 from gentoo.
At startup evolution has asked to transition his file from older to newer
format. Once accepted the transition it has starte
Hi Pierre,
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 13:29 -0500, Pierre Foucault wrote:
> I use Evolution with Ubunto.
Please provide version information. See "Help > About:.
> I can send messages, but Evolution does not
> receive anything for a week. What or where is the problem?
What does that mean? Do you cli
Hello!
I use Evolution with Ubunto. I can send messages, but Evolution does not
receive anything for a week. What or where is the problem?
Thanks.
Happy New Year
Pierre
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list opti
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 11:44 -0800, George J. Walsh wrote:
> With receiving type set to 'Local Delivery' the mail box address is
> auto-set to 'None' whereas in the past it was always set to
> '/var/spool/mail/[login name]'. I attempted to change this but was over
> written at each attempt. The thin
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 07:48 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'd say to open a new bug report for that, it seems like a fallout
from
> a faulty migration (I do not know in what state your machine was
before
> the upgrade to rawhide).
Milan:
I've now upgraded the f18 server to rawhide
Am Mittwoch, den 06.03.2013, 09:18 +0100 schrieb Andre Klapper:
> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 01:34 +0100, Remi wrote:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1049028
>
> Feel free to add your comments in
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evol
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 11:45 -0800, George J. Walsh wrote:
> GDBus.
> Error:org.gtk.GDBus.UnmappedGError.Quark._g_2dkey_2dfile_2derror_2dquark.Code4:
> Data source is missing a [Data Source] group
Hi,
I'd say to open a new bug report for that, it seems like a fallout from
a faulty migration
Last exchange from Milan on this problem was:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910252
Milan Crha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 01:34 +0100, Remi wrote:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1049028
Feel free to add your comments in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1049028
There is obviously nothing that upstream developers can do about
packaging mista
Hello,
This bug :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1049028
is not fixed for me, error message appear : "HTTP error : Method Not
Allowed"
My evolution data package is : "3.6.2-0ubuntu0.1"
someone could help me ?
thanks
PS : sorry for my engl
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 16:00 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
>
> Speak of the devil...
>
> commit 1fd3da8927177ed0517abeaf3c7a29611d64546f
> Author: Matthew Barnes
> Date: Mon Dec 17 11:14:44 2012 -0500
>
> IMAPX: Support non-virtual Junk/Trash folders.
>
Yay! Thanks for doing this.
An
... so thought I ;-)
Either the list server put some older copies in my mailbox or my
mailserver did - tststststs ???
Am Donnerstag, den 20.12.2012, 12:25 -0500 schrieb Peter Hurley:
> On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 15:17 +0100, Thomas Prost wrote:
> > Screens look like expected - but I thought your probl
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 15:17 +0100, Thomas Prost wrote:
> Screens look like expected - but I thought your problem was solved right
> now ?
Mail server time warp ;)
Received: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:09:34 -0500
..
Received: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:27:19 -0800
___
Screens look like expected - but I thought your problem was solved right
now ?
Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2012, 15:27 -0500 schrieb Peter Hurley:
> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:07 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 09:54 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > > Attached are screenshots of:
> >
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 13:18 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> In case you're looking for that commit and missed to ask that:
^^^
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 21:59 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> What tree is the commit on?
> http://git.gnome.org/br
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 07:00 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> peter@thor:~/src/repos/evolution$ git checkout master
> Switched to branch 'master'
> peter@thor:~/src/repos/evolution$ git tree -20
Errm, yeah, I can also do that and get the same results. :P
In case you're looking for that commit and mis
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 10:34 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 21:59 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > What tree is the commit on?
>
> I expect new features on the 3.7 branch (master), as 3.6 is stable.
peter@thor:~/src/repos/evolution$ git checkout master
Switched to branch 'master
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 21:59 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> What tree is the commit on?
I expect new features on the 3.7 branch (master), as 3.6 is stable.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
evolution-list maili
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 16:00 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 15:52 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > Right. duh. So that just leaves the multiple junk and trash folders in
> > evo but not the on the server...
>
> Speak of the devil...
>
> commit 1fd3da8927177ed0517abeaf3c7a29611d
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 15:52 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> I'm working on that right now, but packaging evo + eds is non-trivial.
> Is 3.6.0 not supported anymore? (it's less than 90 days old...)
We support 3.6 by releasing updates: 3.6.1, 3.6.2, ...
Matthew Barnes
___
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 15:52 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> Right. duh. So that just leaves the multiple junk and trash folders in
> evo but not the on the server...
Speak of the devil...
commit 1fd3da8927177ed0517abeaf3c7a29611d64546f
Author: Matthew Barnes
Date: Mon Dec 17 11:14:44 2012 -0500
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:07 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 09:54 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > Attached are screenshots of:
>
> Nothing attached. :)
Yea, I realized that almost immediately and corrected it with a Group
Reply to my own mail -- which my server shows as sent bu
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 09:54 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> Attached are screenshots of:
Nothing attached. :)
> - the evolution folder list for an imap+ email account with multiple
> 'junk' and 'trash' folders and a 'sent' mail folder that evolution isn't
> showing as _the_ sent mail folder.
Is it
Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2012, 09:54 -0500 schrieb Peter Hurley:
> Attached are screenshots of:
> - the evolution folder list for an imap+ email account with multiple
> 'junk' and 'trash' folders and a 'sent' mail folder that evolution isn't
> showing as _the_ sent mail folder.
> - webmail view of t
Attached are screenshots of:
- the evolution folder list for an imap+ email account with multiple
'junk' and 'trash' folders and a 'sent' mail folder that evolution isn't
showing as _the_ sent mail folder.
- webmail view of the server folder list.
How can I determine what evolution is seeing for a
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 09:41 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:45 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on Fedora 17),
> > instead of opening the menu, it opens a new message. The only way I can
> > get the Message menu dropdown to
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 14:04 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> Do you see any other oddities in the way the mouse clicking works either
> in Evolution itself or in any other application?
Not that I've noticed. All the other drop-downs in Evolution work right.
Alt-M works ok in Evolution. Haven't seen
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:45 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on Fedora 17),
> instead of opening the menu, it opens a new message. The only way I can
> get the Message menu dropdown to open is to remember to click-and-hold
> the mouse button down unt
> I presumed that re-installing would also re-do any relevant config
> files. Apparently that is not the case.
Nope, never, it does not work that way.
Application installation / de-installation is a *system* operation.
Application configuration is a *user* operation.
The package neither kno
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 22:57 -0200, Lailah wrote:
>
>
> El jue, 11-10-2012 a las 20:58 -0400, Carpetnailz escribió:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:00 -0500, dbrenner wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:45 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > > > When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on F
> > But issues with mouse clicks, etc... are probably from below evolution
> > [like in X, your video driver, or Gtk].
> >
> How would that affect just one menu button in the app and nothing else?
>
You never said it was ONLY that one menu!
Do you see any other oddities in the way the mouse cl
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 08:43 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > > So why is it happening? I've re-installed evo twice, once with
> > > add/remove software and once with yum. Makes no difference.
> > Why do you think adding and removing the packages(s) will do anything?
> > And whatever front end you use
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 05:32 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 20:58 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:00 -0500, dbrenner wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:45 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > > > When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on F
El jue, 11-10-2012 a las 20:58 -0400, Carpetnailz escribió:
> On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:00 -0500, dbrenner wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:45 -0400, Carpetnailz wrote:
> > > When I click on the "Message" menu item in Evo (3.4.4 on Fedora 17),
> > > instead of opening the menu, it opens a new
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
