On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 12:31 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 10:44 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > NotZed no longer works for Novell, he quit 4 or 5 months ago.
>
> Voluntarily or ..
>
I don't think that's an appropriate question, for a public list...
> >
> > TNEF would
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 18:28 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> hi lee,
>
> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 12:23 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Hmm... if it's a trivial patch why didn't one of the developers just
> > attach it to that bug report?!?
>
> it isn't trivial.
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 18:02 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> hi lee,
>
> On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 22:59 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Speaking of that - I've found that for some reason, when you click the
> > seal, the text in the window that pops up can't be copied and
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 22:41 -0800, Greg Tassone wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 22:39 -0800, Greg Tassone wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 23:01 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 18:48 -0800, Greg Tassone wrote:
> ...
> > >
> > > One o
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 22:41 -0800, Greg Tassone wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 22:39 -0800, Greg Tassone wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 23:01 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 18:48 -0800, Greg Tassone wrote:
> ...
> > >
> > > One o
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 22:41 -0800, Greg Tassone wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 22:39 -0800, Greg Tassone wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 23:01 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 18:48 -0800, Greg Tassone wrote:
> ...
> > >
> > > One o
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 18:48 -0800, Greg Tassone wrote:
> Hope that helps.
Thanks, it works perfectly! I did find the docs, which cover all this,
except key signing, which is really easy - maybe it could be added?
One other question - what in the heck is the weird red blob in the icon
to the left
Where is the documentation? What in the heck is supposed to go in the
"PGP/GPG Key ID" field?
I added someone's key to my GPG keyring and now their messages say
"Valid signature, cannot verify sender". Why not? How do I get it to
be able to verify the sender?
Lee
_
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 17:39 -0800, Ron Eggler (Mobile) wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 11.02.2006, 20:36 -0500 schrieb Lee Revell:
> > On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 17:21 -0800, Ron Eggler (Mobile) wrote:
> > > `/home/reg/Desktop/downloads/evolution_2.4.2.1/gtkhtml-3.8.2/src'
> >
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 17:21 -0800, Ron Eggler (Mobile) wrote:
> `/home/reg/Desktop/downloads/evolution_2.4.2.1/gtkhtml-3.8.2/src'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/home/reg/Desktop/downloads/evolution_2.4.2.1/gtkhtml-3.8.2'
> make: *** [all] Fehler 2
> [EMAIL
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 16:50 -0800, Ron Eggler (Mobile) wrote:
> /opt/gnome/include/libgnome-2.0/libgnome/gnome-program.h:35:18:
> popt.h:
> No such file or directory
Well, does popt.h exist?
$ find /usr/include -name popt.h
/usr/include/popt.h
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -S /usr/include/popt.h
lib
How can I completely disable GPG/PGP checking of signatures on every
message? I think it's a performance problem on slower machines.
Browsing the message list seems to have become significantly slower
lately and I notice sometimes "Verifying message" takes a second or so.
I don't use this feature
On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 20:00 -0700, Stanly Steinberg wrote:
> I want to use a key stroke to hide and unhide deleted messages,
> but I don't see anything in the manual. I note the under the view
> button there is Hide Deleted Messages with D underlined. What does the
> underline mean?
> Stan
Press
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 20:25 -0500, Rick Berger wrote:
>
> Has anyone got any suggestion on what I could done to deactivate Send
> and Receive and how to get them working again. I had to install
> Thunderbird to get this out to you.
>
> Rick
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This happened to me the other day
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 15:02 -0600, Gregg Fowler wrote:
> I just started using Evolution with Ubuntu last Saturday. While I am
> really happy with the program, I don't believe the Spam Filter is
> working correctly. At first I realized that the Spam Assasin package was
> required and I installed it
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 14:43 +, Ben Tyson-Norrman wrote:
> e-msgport.c:39:18: nspr.h: No such file or directory
Is NSPR installed?
Lee
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 14:35 +1100, Michael Abbott wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a large amount of mail that I've just imported and I want to run
> it through the filters to properly categorise it / divide it up.
>
> I already have some filters running on new mail that comes through that
> seems to divid
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 18:56 +, D. D. Brierton wrote:
> I was just watching the Flash demo of Zimbra, a browser based
> Email/Groupware thingy:
>
> http://www.zimbra.com/flash_demo/flash_demo.html
>
> There were a few features in the Flash demo that made me think, "Oh,
> that's really cool!" I
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 22:34 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> hi lee,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2006, 15:12 -0500 schrieb Lee Revell:
> > Is there any plan to map "Find in message" to a saner key combination
> > that "Ctrl-Alt-F"? That's just mess
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 14:12 +, Calum Benson wrote:
> Frankly, I'd suggest that a lot of the things in the list aren't really
> frequently-used enough to need keyboard shortcuts at all, which would
> make it easier to be more HIG-compliant, but obviously I'm not in
> possession of the user data
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 20:19 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> hi lee,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 11.01.2006, 14:09 -0500 schrieb Lee Revell:
> > But the .gconf directory only stores preferences that can easily be
> > restored.
>
> then you never had the wonderful pleasure
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:43 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > I am ready to upgrade from SuSE 9.2 to 10. I have never in the past
> > > been successful at preserving my Evolution inbox, folders, and contacts.
> > >
> > > I have been referred to the Archives of this list, but found no means of
> > > se
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 12:35 +, meldav wrote:
> I am ready to upgrade from SuSE 9.2 to 10. I have never in the past
> been successful at preserving my Evolution inbox, folders, and contacts.
>
> I have been referred to the Archives of this list, but found no means of
> searching this volumunio
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 10:16 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 21:34 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > > The question is not whether you can use the buttons. Yes, they are
> > > > always enabled and do "something".
> > > >
> > > > The problem is when you want to use it to learn ham
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 23:56 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 02:56 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > I was wondering if it is possible to grab all sender email addresses
> > > from messages that have been sent to me and are in a specific folder. I
> > > don't want to have to go
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 23:10 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 23:56 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 02:56 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > > I was wondering if it is possible to grab all sender email addresses
> > > > f
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 23:56 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 02:56 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > I was wondering if it is possible to grab all sender email addresses
> > > from messages that have been sent to me and are in a specific folder. I
> > > don't want to have to go
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 02:23 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > after "evolution --force-shutdown", run "ps ax|grep evol" to find out
> > the process id of evolution-data-server, and then kill the process.
> >
> > also see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323115 .
That's the hard way, the easy wa
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 21:34 +0100, guenther wrote:
> These buttons should not be "mark as" Ham/Spam, but "learn as"
> Ham/Spam.
>
You can't use "Ham" in a user visible interface, no one knows what it
means.
Lee
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolutio
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 16:32 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Depends what you mean by "shut down". The shutdown utility on Linux
> sends a signal which processes can trap and gives them a little time to
> clean up. Only then does it kill them preemptively. A properly-written
> application should
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 10:31 -0600, Jeff Nelson wrote:
> I shut down my notebook without first exiting evolution and that lead
> to the new corruption. Deleting the index files caused new ones to be
> generated.
Why can't Linux handle this gracefully like Windows? On that OS when I
shut down all t
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 13:17 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 13:45 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 11:49 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 12:36 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 20:22 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 14:14 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 19:55 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote:
> > > These messages are then stored into an evolution-specific format which
> > > you cannot select
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 13:05 -0600, Marcos Pinto wrote:
> that's just not right. if you have a pop account in evolution,
> evolution stores all email from that account in an mbox format. and
> then you get screwed when that mbox file gets over 2G
It sounds like you should file this as a bug repor
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 19:55 +0100, Erik Slagter wrote:
> These messages are then stored into an evolution-specific format which
> you cannot select and has nothing to do with mbox or maildir.
Yes, this was what I was getting at - is there a way to change Evo's
INTERNAL mail storage format to Mail
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 11:49 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 12:36 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 11:22 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 10:45 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 1
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 11:22 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 10:45 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 11:50 +0530, B S Srinidhi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 15:40 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > &
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 11:50 +0530, B S Srinidhi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 15:40 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Evolution supports Maildir? This is news to me.
> >
> > How exactly do I tell Evo to use a Maildir instead of mbox?
> >
>
> Its been
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 16:08 -0500, Faeren Madza wrote:
> Robert,
>
Argh, sorry, forget the last message - wrong thread.
Lee
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 16:08 -0500, Faeren Madza wrote:
> Robert,
>
> [1]
> Evo's folder is /home/user/.evolution/ and local mail is kept in
> /home/user/.evolution/mail/local.
>
> [2]
> Folders are organized in IBEX. Being as how I'm not really sure what
> that is, the structure is very simil
On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 13:10 +0530, B S Srinidhi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 15:05 -0600, Marcos Pinto wrote:
> > Evolution is giving me this error:
> > Failed to appened local `Sent' folder: cannot append message to mbox
> > file: /home/markybob/.evolution/mail/local/Sent: File too larg
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 10:26 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=247373 . it's even a HIG
> violation currently. MUSTFIX.
> it's the most annoying bug that i know of.
> can you imagine how many times a day i had to press away those 1 or
> sometimes even 3 pop up w
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 23:35 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> hi lee,
>
> Am Samstag, den 10.12.2005, 17:27 -0500 schrieb Lee Revell:
> > Do you know if there's a bug open for "evolution sometimes downloads
> > dupes from the POP server" already? It shou
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 23:17 +0100, guenther wrote:
> Hints like this preferably should be added to the proper bug report in
> bugzilla, though. Posts to the list tend to be forgotten...
Do you know if there's a bug open for "evolution sometimes downloads
dupes from the POP server" already? It sho
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 23:17 +0100, guenther wrote:
> Hints like this preferably should be added to the proper bug report in
> bugzilla, though. Posts to the list tend to be forgotten...
Added to bug 253244.
Lee
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 22:31 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > > I think every email has an Message-ID. Why not just delete duplicates
> > > > by Message-ID? I think also to mailing lists, the message id is the
> > > > same.
> > >
> > > Yes, they will be the same when Replying to All. Anyway, Message-
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 21:30 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > Note that there is an ambiguity in how you define duplicate messages.
> > > Multiple downloading from pop server results in true duplicates, but the
> > > "reply to all" generally does not (the headers will have minor
> > > differences).
> >
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 13:14 -0700, mickeydog wrote:
> > That would have been a better design. mbox format simply does not scale
> > to tens of thousands of messages.
>
> I would agree.
Depending on how Evolution is coded it might not be too hard to
implement a Maildir backend. It might even be
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 20:55 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 12:39 -0700, mickeydog wrote:
> > i don't understand what you are saying.
> > Is each message a separate file?
>
> no!
That would have been a better design. mbox format simply does not scale
to tens of thous
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 09:32 -0500, Graham Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 12:40 +0100, Martin Klaffenboeck wrote:
> > Hi there!
> >
> > Duplicate Emails are a result of multiple (accidently) downloading an
> > email from a pop server, (inaccidently) if someone sends the mail to two
> > or
If Evo pops up an error ("No route to host") while a different app has
the focus, the error dialog steals the focus. While this is a minor
annoyance, the real problem is that after dismissing the error, the main
Evo window remains focused.
This even affects other Evo windows like the composer - I
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 14:01 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> Do you have a link? I can't find anything in Bugzilla for "message list
> focus" in Mailer or GAL, and bugzilla is terribly slow over dialup.
OK I found the bug:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255303
The
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:50 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> hi lee,
>
> Am Freitag, den 25.11.2005, 16:21 -0500 schrieb Lee Revell:
> > 1. click a mail folder (folder A) in the folder bar
> > 2. scroll down to the end of the message list and click the last
> > message.
1. click a mail folder (folder A) in the folder bar
2. scroll down to the end of the message list and click the last
message. It will appear in preview window.
3. click a different mail folder, folder B, then click folder A again.
While the the selcted message from folder A is remembered, the scr
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 20:48 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 10:00 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> Hey Lee,
> > Why doesn't Evo remember the zoomed state of the text across restarts?
> > Every time I launch Evo the font returns to the default size and
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 20:48 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 10:00 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> Hey Lee,
> > Why doesn't Evo remember the zoomed state of the text across restarts?
> > Every time I launch Evo the font returns to the default size and
Why doesn't Evo remember the zoomed state of the text across restarts?
Every time I launch Evo the font returns to the default size and I have
to zoom out again each time I start it.
I am using Evo 2.4.0. Is this bug fixed in a newer version?
Lee
___
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 06:09 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 14:51 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Why is navigating the message list with the arrow keys so much slower
> > than using the mouse?
> >
> > When I push the down arrow to go to the mext message
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 06:09 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 14:51 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Why is navigating the message list with the arrow keys so much slower
> > than using the mouse?
> >
> > When I push the down arrow to go to the mext message
Why is navigating the message list with the arrow keys so much slower
than using the mouse?
When I push the down arrow to go to the mext message it seems like there
is a delay of about 2 seconds before the focus even moves and the next
message starts to render. But if navigate by repeatedly click
60 matches
Mail list logo
