On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:02:06 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 20:00 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
>> Either I fix it straight away, or if someone volunteers to file a new
>> bug against evolution, thus it's not forgotten, then it'll be nice
>> too.
>
>Bug 796840 - [
On 2018-07-19 at 18:49 +0100, Richard Bown wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 12:32 -0500, Christopher Marlow wrote:
> > I would sort the mail lists by their addresses into
> > different folders so I would know what list i'm reading / talking
> > back to.
> >
> > Folders like:
> > HAM_RADIO_LIST_A
>
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 20:00 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> Either I fix it straight away, or if someone volunteers to file a new
> bug against evolution, thus it's not forgotten, then it'll be nice
> too.
Bug 796840 - [Evolution] Colour of string entered in the "Search" field
>
> So if I understood what you said correctly. Basically instead of
> advancing to 2.28.1 2.28.2 and so on and then finally version 2.29.
> The LTS or Enterprise releases just keep updating patches / fixing
> broken items for lets go with the distro you said in your reply, RHEL's
> Evolution v
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 12:13 -0500, Christopher Marlow wrote:
> When you exit a program, why on re launch does EVO remember your last
> search? When you exit a program shouldn't that search box cleared
> itself out on exit so on next launch you could search for something
> else? Instead of displayin
I'd like to ask everyone on this list to please read and follow
https://wiki.gnome.org/Foundation/CodeOfConduct
Thank you.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnom
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 12:21 -0500, Christopher Marlow wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 09:51 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> So if I understood what you said correctly. Basically instead of
> advancing to 2.28.1 2.28.2 and so on and then finally version 2.29.
> The LTS or Enterprise releases just keep up
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 21:43 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 18:49 +0100, Richard Bown wrote:
> > Filters are boolean , so you cant use "maybe"
>
> Hi,
>
> a combination of filters and their order could be a quite complex
> algorithm.
>
> Each single filter could be either any
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 21:43 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
...snip...
>
> Also consider that preserving existing pigeon holes could be
> counterproductive. Instead of filtering by using existing pigeon holes,
> it could be better to restructure the pigeon holes in combination with
> developing filters
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 18:49 +0100, Richard Bown wrote:
> Filters are boolean , so you cant use "maybe"
Hi,
a combination of filters and their order could be a quite complex
algorithm.
Each single filter could be either any of the conditions or all the
conditions of the filter, unless a filter do
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 12:32 -0500, Christopher Marlow wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 11:25 +0100, Richard Bown wrote:
> >
> > I'll give an example
> > As you can see from my sig block I'm a Radio Ham,
> > I filter personal Ham mail in to one folder, I also subscribe to
> > several mailing lists
>
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 11:25 +0100, Richard Bown wrote:
>
> I'll give an example
> As you can see from my sig block I'm a Radio Ham,
> I filter personal Ham mail in to one folder, I also subscribe to
> several mailing lists
>
Oh Richard! That would totally set my OCD off. < Laughing Out Loud>
M
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 09:51 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> There's lots of reasons why people can't or won't upgrade - primarily
> a
> reasonably old version such as this is because the user is running an
> LTS or Enterprise release. These sort of releases maintain the same
> version of application
Hi Y'all,
I hate to steer this conversation towards a different direction ( back
towards my original email)
But, I still don't understand why even though I closed Evolution
properly using FILE > EXIT. That the next time I loaded up EVO and
clicked on my "Archives folder" that in the search bar at
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 07:28 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 23:23 -0500, Christopher Marlow wrote:
> > Why won't you upgrade to 3.28.1-2 which is the current version
> > I am
> > using? Unless your distro doesn't have the latest version of EVO in
> > their repo's?
>
> I thi
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 12:48 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 20:00 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> > ... and even evolution doesn't use that function anymore, it uses
> > some CSS foo to workaround the problem, it doesn't work for some
Hi,
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 20:00 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> ... and even evolution doesn't use that function anymore, it uses
> some CSS foo to workaround the problem, it doesn't work for some
> reason. Either I fix it straight away, or...
fixed [1] for 3.29.90+
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 10:21 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > Hi
> > I think better would be to make it apply to all folders, it would
> > make
> > searching quicker, just then a case on moving down the folder tree.
>
> Oh I would hate that and I really don't think it would make searching
> any quicker
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 10:17 +0100, Richard Bown wrote:
> Does the version under dev track the stable release, or is it pure
> coincidence that stable is 28.4 and dev is 29.4.
As Milan says, versioning tracks the Gnome version. I'd just add that
the minor number (28 and 29 here, because of course i
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 11:35 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 10:17 +0100, Richard Bown wrote:
> > Just interested in how the versioning works
>
> Hi,
> Evolution projects (specifically evolution-data-server, evolution,
> evolution-ews and evolution-mapi) fo
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 22:26 -0400, Dr. John H. Lauterbach wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Christine
> To: evolution-list@gnome.org
> Subject: [Evolution] recipients are unable to open enclosed pdfs
> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:52:03 -0400
>
> Dear List,
> I'm using Evolution version 3.
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 10:17 +0100, Richard Bown wrote:
> Just interested in how the versioning works
Hi,
Evolution projects (specifically evolution-data-server, evolution,
evolution-ews and evolution-mapi) follow GNOME release schedule:
https://www.gnome.org/start/unstable
GNOME itself ha
Hi,
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 10:17 +0100, Richard Bown wrote:
> Does the version under dev track the stable release, or is it pure
> coincidence that stable is 28.4 and dev is 29.4.
Coincidence. https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointTwentynine but
maintainers are welcome to release additional versions.
> Hi
> I think better would be to make it apply to all folders, it would make
> searching quicker, just then a case on moving down the folder tree.
Oh I would hate that and I really don't think it would make searching
any quicker and would slow everything down. I have some massive
folders that
I started a new thread as this went off the original topic
Andre said:-
I think you answered your question yourself already.
ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/evolution/3.28/ shows that the
latest stable Evolution version is 3.28.4 so you may ask yourself why
you are still on old version 3.28
>
> I'm using Evolution version 3.10.4. Sometimes when I send a group
> e-mail the recipients are unable to open enclosed pdfs, they come out as
> rows of numbers after my note.
>
When you say "group email" do you mean to a mailing list or just to
multiple recipients?
Does the copy of the em
> >
> > I'm using Evolution version 3.10.4. Sometimes when I send a group
> > e-mail the recipients are unable to open enclosed pdfs, they come out
> > as
> > rows of numbers after my note.
> >
> >
> Why won't you upgrade to 3.28.1-2 which is the current version I am
> using? Unless your
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 08:31 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 19:13 +0100, Richard Bown wrote:
> > I think better would be to make it apply to all folders, it would
> > make searching quicker, just then a case on moving down the folder
> > tree.
>
> Hi,
> th
28 matches
Mail list logo
