On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 07:51 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> is running Evolution 3.16 with GNOME 3.14 supported, that means
> tested by someone?
Hi,
yes, it is. I currently run the development version of evolution with
it too.
> Will all futures work?
Evolution didn't change its hard require
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 14:08 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> Any ideas?
Hi,
the only left option I can think of is that the missing messages are
marked either as Junk or as Deleted. These messages are not shown in
regular folders.
You can View->Show Deleted Messages, but the Junk messages ar
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 07:50 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> As the local backend can cope with missing UIDs, I guess the
> read-only On The Web backend can safely add missing UIDs as well.
Hi,
I did so, for 3.17.2+ [1] and 3.16.2+ [2]. It requires to cleanup
~/.cache/evolution/calendar//
and re
I'm using Evolution 3.12.11 (on Ubuntu GNOME 15.04). I used Gnome's
Online Accounts to add two different GMail accounts plus a traditional
IMAP account at my ISP. All are using IMAPX types in Evo.
Up until today, all was fine. However, suddenly most of my previous
email in the two gmail account
Dear Joakim,
Thank you for your quick response.
Am Samstag, den 02.05.2015, 11:58 + schrieb Joakim Tjernlund:
> You need to set LDFLAGS too
Unfortunately it still fails to build when passing
`LDFLAGS='-fsanitize=address'`.
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
Dear Evolution folks,
is running Evolution 3.16 with GNOME 3.14 supported, that means tested
by someone? Will all futures work?
I am thinking about if it’s feasible to put Evolution 3.16 in Debian
Backports [1] for Debian 8 (Jessie), which has GNOME 3.14 packaged.
Thanks,
Paul
[1] http://ba
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 00:07 +0200, Jay Strict wrote:
> The first 3 lines of the .ics file are:
>
>
> BEGIN:VCALENDAR
> VERSION:2.0
> PRODID:-//dhtmlXScheduler//NONSGML v2.2//EN
> ==
On 2015-05-04 at 14:47, Milan Crha wrote:
> Is the calendar public, thus anyone can use it, or it's a semi-private
> calendar? Being it a public calendar maybe someone can look on it. All
> there matters is the version of the .ics file. The RFC I gave a link
> to describes version 2.0. Earlier vers
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 10:27 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 13:51 -0600, James Lay wrote:
> > but then Evo pops up with HTTP Error: message corrupt.
>
> Hi,
> it's an error message Yahoo! server returns. It used to work in the
> past, but after some time it's broken, rega
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 14:30 +0200, Jay Strict wrote:
> But maybe it is too much of an effort...?
Hi,
not necessarily too much. The problem is that evolution uses the UID
(and eventually RID - recurrence ID) as an identifier of the event,
thus it can operate with it in the UI, and even with
On 2015-05-04 at 10:15, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 22:05 +0200, Jay Strict wrote:
>> == snip ==
>>
>> (evolution-calendar-factory-subprocess:1824): libecalbackendhttp
>> -WARNING
>> **: The component does not have the mandator
On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 13:51 -0600, James Lay wrote:
> but then Evo pops up with HTTP Error: message corrupt.
Hi,
it's an error message Yahoo! server returns. It used to work in the
past, but after some time it's broken, regardless of the evolution
version. I'm not aware of a change on thei
On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 22:05 +0200, Jay Strict wrote:
> == snip ==
>
> (evolution-calendar-factory-subprocess:1824): libecalbackendhttp
> -WARNING
> **: The component does not have the mandatory property UID
>
>
On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 11:02 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote:
> The following problem recently started (and apparently
> spontaneously) with 3.13.7 operating under Ubuntu 14.04.2 on my DELL
> Vostro 3500.
Hi,
3.13.7, as a development version, was released on 2014-10-27. There
were done too m
14 matches
Mail list logo
