Re: [Evolution] GTK transparency issue partially back after upgrade from 3.2 to 3.4

2012-08-22 Thread Milan Crha
Hi, On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 11:34 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > No. Just Evolution was upgraded. libgtk3 stayed 3.4.2-3, which contains > the patch. Hmm, maybe more consecutive changes are required? I do not develop gtk3, but it sometimes happen that one patch works because of previous change

Re: [Evolution] GTK transparency issue partially back after upgrade from 3.2 to 3.4

2012-08-22 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Mittwoch, den 22.08.2012, 11:21 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha: > On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 09:33 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > GTK+ 3.4 is rife with regressions due mostly to the move to X Input > > > Extension 2.x (XI2) and CSS handling changes. If you build Evolution > > > 3.4 against GTK+ 3.2, a lo

Re: [Evolution] GTK transparency issue partially back after upgrade from 3.2 to 3.4

2012-08-22 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 09:33 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > GTK+ 3.4 is rife with regressions due mostly to the move to X Input > > Extension 2.x (XI2) and CSS handling changes. If you build Evolution > > 3.4 against GTK+ 3.2, a lot of these issues go away. But most distros > > are shipping GTK+ 3.

Re: [Evolution] Maintenance of Evolution 3.4.x

2012-08-22 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 09:31 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Evolution 3.4.4 was released on August 13th. Is a 3.4.5 release planned? Hi, there are not planned more releases in 3.4.x by upstream, and even this 3.4.4 came quite late. The main focus is on 3.5.x now. Bye, Milan __

[Evolution] Default sorting of message lists (was: Again no smooth upgrade from Evolution 3.2 to 3.4)

2012-08-22 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2012, 11:21 +0100 schrieb David Woodhouse: > On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 09:50 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > > 1. The settings for sorting of messages were not kept. I had it on > > »Date« before and after starting Evolution 3.4 nothing was selected, > > which was quite confusin

Re: [Evolution] Again no smooth upgrade from Evolution 3.2 to 3.4

2012-08-22 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Andre, Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2012, 10:58 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper: > On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 09:50 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: […] > > Here are my issues. I have *not* looked yet, if there are any open > > tickets at GNOME’s Bugzilla already. > > Did you upgrade your distro? > Or did yo

Re: [Evolution] GTK transparency issue partially back after upgrade from 3.2 to 3.4

2012-08-22 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2012, 08:05 -0400 schrieb Matthew Barnes: > On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 11:45 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > I also wonder why it worked with Evolution 3.2 and does not with 3.4. > > > > So it looks like a new bug to me. > > GTK+ 3.4 is rife with regressions due mostly to the move

[Evolution] Maintenance of Evolution 3.4.x

2012-08-22 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Evolution folks, the next stable release of Debian codenamed Wheezy will ship Evolution 3.4.x. That means, for the next two or three years it will be used by a large user base and needs to be supported by fixes, which the Debian security team will normally do. Evolution 3.4.4 was released o

[Evolution] User experience about orange search folder icons

2012-08-22 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Evolution folks, I just wanted to inform you, that my mother was irritated by the orange search folder icons. She thought it means some kind of error, which it is not as far as I can see. Though I do not know if that changed between 3.2.2 and 3.4.3, but it was just noted now anyway. Thank