Am Mittwoch, den 22.08.2012, 11:21 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha: > On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 09:33 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > GTK+ 3.4 is rife with regressions due mostly to the move to X Input > > > Extension 2.x (XI2) and CSS handling changes. If you build Evolution > > > 3.4 against GTK+ 3.2, a lot of these issues go away. But most distros > > > are shipping GTK+ 3.4 now. > > > > That still does not explain, why Evolution 3.2.2 did not have these > > problems. > > it does explain it. The problem is not in evolution, but in gtk3 > version. Older evolution used older gtk3, newer uses newer. And newer > gtk3 is "broken" in certain ways.
No. Just Evolution was upgraded. libgtk3 stayed 3.4.2-3, which contains the patch. I submitted a new report for this issue to the GNOME Bugzilla [1]. > The best is if the gtk3 maintainers will be able to handle found > regressions, the worse is to downgrade gtk3, but it's usually not > doable, as it's a core system component and other projects can depend on > newer gtk3. True. In GNOME Terminal it helped to deselect the check box »Use system theme« in the profile to not have a black background. Thanks, Paul [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682435
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
