On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 13:33 -0700, nielsrune wrote:
> I think I just found the solution. (I'm in Denmark using the previously
> mentioned government issued certificate).
>
> Using : A fresh Xubuntu 11.04-alpha3 in virtualbox running Evolution 2.32.2
>
> Mozilla's NSS reference for certutil at
> h
On 17 March 2011 09:38, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 09:29 -0700, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Is there any evolution-ews built package already? What's the state of
> > the connector?
>
> Not yet. We're planning to get an Alpha release out in the next week or
> so, and
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 09:29 -0700, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is there any evolution-ews built package already? What's the state of
> the connector?
Not yet. We're planning to get an Alpha release out in the next week or
so, and then we might build packages for it.
I'm currently reading
On 17 March 2011 07:27, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 09:56 +0100, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> > I'll add my 5 cents... Are there any plans for evolution-mapi to connect
> > through RPC over HTTp proxies? (yes I know it is bad design)
>
> Since it uses libsoup for its connectivity, e
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 08:43 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
> It *is* alive and used, even when you exit.
>
> awilliam@linux-yu4c:~> ps ax | grep evolution
> 5768 0:00 /usr/lib/evolution/2.32/evolution-alarm-notify
> 5833 0:02 /usr/lib/evolution-data-server/e-calendar-factory
> 6020 0:0
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 09:56 +0100, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> I'll add my 5 cents... Are there any plans for evolution-mapi to connect
> through RPC over HTTp proxies? (yes I know it is bad design)
Since it uses libsoup for its connectivity, evolution-ews ought to cope
with this.
--
dwmw2
___
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:57 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> Aaahh, that would probably explain it then. I can't ask these MS guys to
> fix exchange since I'm supposed to be using Outlook on Windows XP, so I
> suppose I'll just have to live with it.
My experience that even when working for a *lar
On 17 March 2011 14:53, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:27 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> >
> > MS exchange via MAPI. Could it be exchange that's screwing it up?
>
> Quite feasibly.
>
> For the list detection to work, we have to get those headers at the time
> we fetch the mes
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:27 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
>
> MS exchange via MAPI. Could it be exchange that's screwing it up?
Quite feasibly.
For the list detection to work, we have to get those headers at the time
we fetch the message *summary* (when it first appears in the mailbox).
If we
On 17 March 2011 14:22, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:14 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> > I've forwarded a sample to your address.
>
> ... which works perfectly here. If I extract the mail you forwarded, and
> send it to myself as a standalone message rather than an attachmen
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:14 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> I've forwarded a sample to your address.
... which works perfectly here. If I extract the mail you forwarded, and
send it to myself as a standalone message rather than an attachment,
then Ctrl-L works and the 'Reply to List' menu option
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 13:43 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> Good day all,
>
> I am a member of the ubuntu-users list. When I receive an email from
> the list the sender's email address appears in the 'sender' and
> 'reply-to' field, so if 'Reply' is clicked, the reply goes to the
> sender,
Corre
On 17 March 2011 14:10, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:02 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> > CTRL-L does nothing. 'Reply to list' in the message menu is greyed
> > out (disabled).
>
> OK, that sounds like the ubuntu-users list doesn't include *any* of the
> headers that Evoluti
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:02 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> CTRL-L does nothing. 'Reply to list' in the message menu is greyed
> out (disabled).
OK, that sounds like the ubuntu-users list doesn't include *any* of the
headers that Evolution would recognise as "list headers". And there are
a *lot*
On 17 March 2011 13:49, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 13:43 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> >
> > I am a member of the ubuntu-users list. When I receive an email from the
> > list the sender's email address appears in the 'sender' and 'reply-to'
> > field, so if 'Reply' is click
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 13:43 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
> The cause of the problem is probably the way the Ubuntu list has been
> set up, but is there a way around this cumbersome cutting and pasting
> I have to do to reply to this list?
Short run: Use Control+L, as you already wrote...
Long run
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 13:43 +0200, Mark Widdicombe wrote:
>
> I am a member of the ubuntu-users list. When I receive an email from the
> list the sender's email address appears in the 'sender' and 'reply-to'
> field, so if 'Reply' is clicked, the reply goes to the sender, and if 'Reply
> to all'
Good day all,
I am a member of the ubuntu-users list. When I receive an email from the
list the sender's email address appears in the 'sender' and 'reply-to'
field, so if 'Reply' is clicked, the reply goes to the sender, and if 'Reply
to all' is clicked, the reply goes to the sender and the list
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 17:06 +0530, Bharath Acharya wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 11:13 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 08:09 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > GAL in evolution-exchange is using patched openldap. The patch adds ntlm
> > > authentication
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 11:13 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 08:09 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > GAL in evolution-exchange is using patched openldap. The patch adds ntlm
> > authentication. It doesn't use camel for addresbook at all. Maybe your
> > change ca
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 08:09 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
>
> Hi,
> GAL in evolution-exchange is using patched openldap. The patch adds ntlm
> authentication. It doesn't use camel for addresbook at all. Maybe your
> change can be modified for the openldap patch [1].
Oh for $DEITY's sake. Yet
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 08:54 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> [Off-topic]
>
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 08:09 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> > By the way, it's usually better to attach patches (either to bugzilla or
> > to an email), to avoid issues which can be added by clients when
> > decoding and showing
[Off-topic]
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 08:09 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> By the way, it's usually better to attach patches (either to bugzilla or
> to an email), to avoid issues which can be added by clients when
> decoding and showing text part.
...like Evolution 2.32, for example. ;-)
https://bugzill
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 00:34 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 07:31 +, Milan Juricek wrote:
> > i`d like to ask you... Does Evolution support NTLM v2? Or when will
> > this feature be implemented in the GAL authentication?
> > Now we are using Evo + Exchange plug-in (Exchan
24 matches
Mail list logo
