On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 08:54 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > [Off-topic] > > On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 08:09 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > > By the way, it's usually better to attach patches (either to bugzilla or > > to an email), to avoid issues which can be added by clients when > > decoding and showing text part.
I usually expect patches to be inline in email. It makes them a lot easier to read and to cite when replying to them. That is the norm, in most environments I deal with. Any client which cannot show (and save) a simple text/plain email without corrupting it is *broken*. > ...like Evolution 2.32, for example. ;-) > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=640829 [FIXED in 2.91] Eep, scary :) I think that fix needs to be committed to the gnome-2-32 branch too; even if we don't do another release, at least it's right there for all the distributors to pick up. 2.32 is our current stable release, and we ought at least to be acting as a central point for the real bug fixes rather than leaving all the distributors to fend for themselves. I can't ask people to resend patches as attachments just because I choose to use a buggy mail client. -- dwmw2 _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
