Re: [Evolution] Missing contacts after upgrade

I gained access to my addressbook by copying a backup of my .evolution directory into the home directory of a virtual machine that was running Fedora 11. So I backed up the settings (File->Backup Settings) which was about 29MB of data, scp'ed it back to my workstation and attempted to restore

Re: [Evolution] Is it me, or is Evolution 2.30 buggy?

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:54 PM, portsample wrote: > Is it me, or is Evolution 2.30 buggy? > > I've been running Evolution as my daily driver since 2002 when Ximian > was maintaining it. For what it is I have been very happy, until > installing 2.30.1.2 which is the version shipping with openSuse

Re: [Evolution] Is it me, or is Evolution 2.30 buggy?

Much better! I did the upgrade using the openSuse YAST update application on my laptop, upgrading all of GNOME to the current stable version. There were only 5 or 6 conflicts that needed addressing. My desk top, however had 30-40 conflicts...I aborted this upgrade. Has anyone tried Zypper w/succes

Re: [Evolution] Problem reading PGP encrypted message

On 4 November 2010 21:19, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 16:48 -0500, dbrenner wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 18:34 -0300, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote: > > > You are right Dan, we are using exchange as an email server, and > > > connecting > > > to it through IMAP. I gu

Re: [Evolution] Problem reading PGP encrypted message

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 16:48 -0500, dbrenner wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 18:34 -0300, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote: > > You are right Dan, we are using exchange as an email server, and > > connecting > > to it through IMAP. I guess that would be the issue. I'll try using a > > GMail > > accou

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 23:18 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > On 04/11/2010 21:02, Pete Biggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:43 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > > > >> On 04/11/2010 20:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >> > >>> On 11/4/10 3:38 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > >>>

Re: [Evolution] Problem reading PGP encrypted message

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 18:34 -0300, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote: > You are right Dan, we are using exchange as an email server, and > connecting > to it through IMAP. I guess that would be the issue. I'll try using a > GMail > account and let you know. > > Any idea if the exchange issue is fix

Re: [Evolution] Problem reading PGP encrypted message

On 4 November 2010 17:59, dbrenner wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 17:03 -0300, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote: > > We tried both encrypting without signing and encrypting and signing. > > We are > > using PGP, we generated our signatures using Gnome's password and > > encryption > > keys applic

Re: [Evolution] Problem reading PGP encrypted message

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 17:03 -0300, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote: > We tried both encrypting without signing and encrypting and signing. > We are > using PGP, we generated our signatures using Gnome's password and > encryption > keys application. There's no error message, just the message with b

Re: [Evolution] Problem reading PGP encrypted message

On 11/4/10 4:29 PM, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote: On 4 November 2010 17:50, Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: On 11/4/10 3:33 PM, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote: On 4 November 2010 16:56, Patrick O'Callaghan mailto:p.

Re: [Evolution] Problem reading PGP encrypted message

On 4 November 2010 17:50, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On 11/4/10 3:33 PM, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> >> On 4 November 2010 16:56, Patrick O'Callaghan > p...@usb.ve>> wrote: >> >>[Please don't top-post on this list] >> >> >>On 11/4/10 2:08 PM, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com >>

Re: [Evolution] Problem reading PGP encrypted message

On 11/4/10 3:33 PM, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote: On 4 November 2010 16:56, Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: [Please don't top-post on this list] On 11/4/10 2:08 PM, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Patrick, th

Re: [Evolution] Problem reading PGP encrypted message

On 4 November 2010 16:56, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > [Please don't top-post on this list] > > > On 11/4/10 2:08 PM, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Hi Patrick, the problem is that I only see the two attachments (both >> .asc), not the email text. Sorry if I didn't express myself correctl

Re: [Evolution] Problem reading PGP encrypted message

[Please don't top-post on this list] On 11/4/10 2:08 PM, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Patrick, the problem is that I only see the two attachments (both .asc), not the email text. Sorry if I didn't express myself correctly, he has my public key and I have his, we already verified that si

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On 11/4/10 2:27 PM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: It's been mentioned several times here that Evo relies heavily on the status of Network-Manager (or whatever you have installed to handle the status of your connectivity) to know whether or not it shold place itself on or off -line. Actually it's

Re: [Evolution] Newbie : many questions...

On 11/4/10 2:28 PM, David BERCOT wrote: Hello, I'm a new user of Evolution. Before, I used Claws-mail. So, I have many questions in order to have Evolution more... usable ;-) - is it possible to have, in the folder list, the number of mails (total and not read) ? - is it possible to reduce Ev

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On 11/4/10 2:24 PM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: All this to say I'm quite confident the "race" issue Patrick indicated can effectively be put to rest in light of the above. The classic race condition with IMAP is that some process (e.g. a notifier or an independant MUA) reads your mail so that yo

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On 04/11/2010 21:02, Pete Biggs wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:43 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: On 04/11/2010 20:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On 11/4/10 3:38 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: On 04/11/2010 19:00, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +

[Evolution] Newbie : many questions...

Hello, I'm a new user of Evolution. Before, I used Claws-mail. So, I have many questions in order to have Evolution more... usable ;-) - is it possible to have, in the folder list, the number of mails (total and not read) ? - is it possible to reduce Evolution in the systray (notification zone

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:43 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > On 04/11/2010 20:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On 11/4/10 3:38 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > >> On 04/11/2010 19:00, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Good day, > Evo

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On 04/11/2010 20:57, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:18 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: On 04/11/2010 19:26, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > >> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: >> >>> Good day, >>

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:18 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > On 04/11/2010 19:26, Pete Biggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > >> > >>> Good day, > >>> Evolution 2.30.3 > >>> Debi

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 11:00 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On 11/4/10 9:34 AM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:27 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >> On 11/4/10 8:50 AM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > >> >> Meaning the time taken to run the search selection c

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On 04/11/2010 20:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On 11/4/10 3:38 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: On 04/11/2010 19:00, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: Good day, Evolution 2.30.3 Debian squeeze freeze fully updated. After installing squeeze i tried

Re: [Evolution] Problem reading PGP encrypted message

Hi Patrick, the problem is that I only see the two attachments (both .asc), not the email text. Sorry if I didn't express myself correctly, he has my public key and I have his, we already verified that signing works OK (both see our valid signatures in the messages). I can attach the message sourc

Re: [Evolution] Problem reading PGP encrypted message

On 11/4/10 10:21 AM, pablo.a.saave...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'm having problems reading PGP signed messages sent by another evolution user. He sends it by checking the encrypt message option in the compose menu. The email shows only two PGP/MIME-encrypted attachments. Any clue of what can

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:18 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > On 04/11/2010 19:26, Pete Biggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > >> > >>> Good day, > >>> Evolution 2.30.3 > >>> Debian

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On 11/4/10 3:48 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: On 04/11/2010 19:26, Pete Biggs wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: Good day, Evolution 2.30.3 Debian squeeze freeze fully updated. After installing squeeze i t

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On 04/11/2010 19:33, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: Good day, Evolution 2.30.3 Debian squeeze freeze fully updated. After installing squeeze i tried to use evolution but the ** send / receive ** stays grayed out. The rest seems fine. I

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On 04/11/2010 19:26, Pete Biggs wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: Good day, Evolution 2.30.3 Debian squeeze freeze fully updated. After installing squeeze i tried to use evolution but the **

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:08 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > On 04/11/2010 19:00, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > > > >> Good day, > >> Evolution 2.30.3 > >> Debian squeeze freeze fully updated. > >> After installing squeeze i tried t

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On 11/4/10 3:38 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: On 04/11/2010 19:00, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: Good day, Evolution 2.30.3 Debian squeeze freeze fully updated. After installing squeeze i tried to use evolution but the ** send / receive ** s

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On 04/11/2010 19:00, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: Good day, Evolution 2.30.3 Debian squeeze freeze fully updated. After installing squeeze i tried to use evolution but the ** send / receive ** stays grayed out. The rest seems fine.

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Good day, > > Evolution 2.30.3 > > Debian squeeze freeze fully updated. > > After installing squeeze i tried to use evolution but the ** send / > receive ** stays grayed out. > The rest seems fine. > > I reinstalled it but no diffe

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > > Good day, > > Evolution 2.30.3 > > Debian squeeze freeze fully updated. > > After installing squeeze i tried to use evolution but the ** send / > > receive ** stays gray

Re: [Evolution] send / receive grayed out

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 20:05 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Good day, > Evolution 2.30.3 > Debian squeeze freeze fully updated. > After installing squeeze i tried to use evolution but the ** send / > receive ** stays grayed out. > The rest seems fine. You are offline. -- Adam Tauno Williams

[Evolution] send / receive grayed out

Good day, Evolution 2.30.3 Debian squeeze freeze fully updated. After installing squeeze i tried to use evolution but the ** send / receive ** stays grayed out. The rest seems fine. I reinstalled it but no difference. Kindly some suggestions to correct this please Thanks Johan _

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On 11/4/10 9:34 AM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:27 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On 11/4/10 8:50 AM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: >> Meaning the time taken to run the search selection criterion on the >> contents of the mailbox. This should be similar to the time ta

[Evolution] Problem reading PGP encrypted message

Hi all, I'm having problems reading PGP signed messages sent by another evolution user. He sends it by checking the encrypt message option in the compose menu. The email shows only two PGP/MIME-encrypted attachments. Any clue of what can the issue be? The only difference is that my co-worker is u

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:27 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On 11/4/10 8:50 AM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > >> Meaning the time taken to run the search selection criterion on the > >> contents of the mailbox. This should be similar to the time taken to run > >> a filter, unless the implemen

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On 11/4/10 8:50 AM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: Meaning the time taken to run the search selection criterion on the contents of the mailbox. This should be similar to the time taken to run a filter, unless the implementations are completely different. Must be different. I do see the new mail in my

Re: [Evolution] Message Filter vs. Search Folders - Open Discussion

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:50 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:10 -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > > As to efficiency, I can't off-hand think of an obvious reason why > > search > > > folders should be faster than filters unless the criteria are just > > > simple

Re: [Evolution] Question

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 00:15 +0100, Adam Zabrocki wrote: > Hi, > I have a question about encryption from evolution site. > Is it possible to encrypt outgoing message and using someone else public > key than the receiver? This doesn't make much sense. > Sometimes public key was generated for one e

Re: [Evolution] Error while building Evolution 2.91

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:02 +0100, Stefano Facchini wrote: > I'm trying to build Evolution 2.91.1. I downloaded the source with git > and, after installing some other deps, successfully run ./autogen.sh. > Then I tried the "make" commmand, it compiled for a while but I finally > obtained the follow

Re: [Evolution] Question

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 00:15 +0100, Adam Zabrocki wrote: > Is it possible to encrypt outgoing message and using someone else public > key than the receiver? > > Sometimes public key was generated for one e-mail but the same person > has a few emails or aliases. Is it possible somehow to choose whic