Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
-- next part --
An HTML att
or 282
>>mpg
>>UK) fuel consumption rating for an ICE car.
>>...
>>The battery pack and motor work in sync to such an extent that 95%
of
>>the stored energy ends up at the wheels.
>>
>>-
>>
>>Peri
>>
>>
>>
>>
>><&
tps://quietcleanseattle.org/ >>
>>
>>___
>>Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
>>No other addresses in TO and CC fields
>>UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>>ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/ar
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20220308/2145e3da/attachment.html>
wer, and other ancillaries.
>> >>...
>> >>Daimler says that the Vision EQXX consumes less than 10 kWh/100 km
>>(>6
>> >>miles/kWh), which is equivalent to a 1L/100 km (235 mpg U.S. or 282
>> >>mpg
>> >>UK) fuel consumption rating for an ICE
On 8 Mar 2022 at 18:18, paul dove via EV wrote:
> 166wh sounds like hype
That kind of efficiency is quite possible for a fairly light conventional
vehicle at low to moderate speeds. Solectria Forces managed about 150 wh/mi
in 35-45mph suburban driving. But those were simple cars. When you st
Hi Folks
I just got back from Team Nissan dealer Roanoke VA and they said the Recall on
my 2013 was too old to be included and did a $250 evaluation and said that
since my vehicle sat for 3 months while on vacation , that it caused the
problem due to low battery and not the software. The servic
Mark,
That is absolute bollocks.
As far as I know: *Recalls* never time out, they are mandatory,
enforced by external entities, so it is grounds for a complaint
against the manufacturer.
I have similar experience - dealers often have no clue what they are
required to do, so they try to bluff you ou
For what it is worth:
I have a 2013 Leaf (not the best aerodynamics) and get consistently
just below 200Wh/mi at a steady 55MPH.
Have done 92 miles of freeway without running out of juice (just
getting the very low battery warning before arriving) with my 24kWh
pack.
So the 166 number (6 mi/kWh) is
I'm pretty sure that Cor is right; safety recalls don't expire, although
I've read that the manufacturer can challenge the requirement if the vehicle
is more than 15 years old.
Do I recall right that your Leaf's VIN was NOT listed as one to which that
recall applied? If that's true, then you p
Check your VIN against the recall checker. If it shows up, you get the
repair for free. If it doesn't show up, either the repair was already
done, or your vehicle is not affected.
Jay
On 3/8/22 18:24, Cor van de Water via EV wrote:
Mark,
That is absolute bollocks.
As far as I know: *Recalls*
11 matches
Mail list logo
