On 29 Jun 2022 at 15:00, Peri Hartman via EV wrote:
> If we were to "only" double the efficiency, that would be phenomenal
Yeah, that would be great, but don't hold your breath.
>From what I can tell, a lot of research is being done on ferroelectric PV
these days, not because it's likely to be
;< Annoyed by leaf blowers ? https://quietcleanseattle.org/ >>
-- Original Message --
From: "Haudy Kazemi via EV"
To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List"
Cc: "Haudy Kazemi" ; dar...@econogics.com
Sent: 28-Jun-22 19:14:16
Subject: Re: [EVDL] 1000 x solar
g on to turn received photons into usable
> > electricity.
> >
> > Darryl
> >
> > On 6/28/2022 4:07 PM, ev-requ...@lists.evdl.org wrote:
> > > Message: 4
> > > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 10:18:04 -0400
> > > From: Peter Eckhoff
> >
e: 4
> > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 10:18:04 -0400
> > From: Peter Eckhoff
> > To: Peri Hartman, Electric Vehicle Discussion List
> >
> > Subject: Re: [EVDL] 1000 x solar break through.
> > Message-ID:
> >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charse
.
Darryl
On 6/28/2022 4:07 PM, ev-requ...@lists.evdl.org wrote:
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 10:18:04 -0400
From: Peter Eckhoff
To: Peri Hartman, Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: Re: [EVDL] 1000 x solar break through.
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; char
Off topic
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 08:32:59 PM PDT, Lawrence Rhodes via EV
wrote:
If true, it's the end of fossil fuels. Lawrence Rhodes
https://www.mining.com/recent-discovery-may-give-solar-cells-a-thousand-times-more-power/
-- next part --
An HTML attach
Lackey
Subject: Re: [EVDL] 1000 x solar break through. On 28 Jun
2022 at 10:18, Peter Eckhoff via EV wrote:> Might be that it's 1000% better
than silicon on a $/kw basis.> didn't have time to read the article.The posted
article is *not* saying that the experimental device is &q
On 28 Jun 2022 at 10:18, Peter Eckhoff via EV wrote:
> Might be that it's 1000% better than silicon on a $/kw basis.
> didn't have time to read the article.
The posted article is *not* saying that the experimental device is "1000%
better than silicon."
It says, "Researchers at Martin Luther U
After going over the article, this is the relevant statement: " Researchers
at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg achieved an increase in the
photovoltaic effect of ferroelectric crystals *by a factor of 10* by
creating crystalline layers of barium titanate, strontium titanate and
calcium ti
This is the paper the article came from:
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abe4206
Likely worth a read to find out where the 1000% might have come from.
Might be that it's 1000% better than silicon on a $/kw basis.
didn't have time to read the article. Gotta go...
Peter
On Tue, Jun 2
I have no idea about the chemistries and technologies presented in the
article. But one thing for certain: current efficiency is around 20%.
The best possible would be 100%, which of course is never achievable.
Even that would be "only" a factor of 5, not 1000.
Peri
<< Annoyed by leaf blowers
Nope. Read it again. You've been click-baited.
David Roden, EVDL moderator & general lackey
To reach me, don't reply to this message; I won't get it. Use my
offlist address here : http://evdl.org/help/index.html#supt
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
12 matches
Mail list logo
