Hi Mirja!
> -Original Message-
> From: iesg On Behalf Of Mirja Kühlewind via
> Datatracker
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2019 5:10 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: emu-cha...@ietf.org; emu@ietf.org
> Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on charter-ietf-emu-05-02: (with
> COMMENT)
>
> Mirja K
Hello!
I conducted an AD review of draft-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-06 and this document is
in good shape. Thanks for all of the work on it. I have minor questions and
editorial nits which can be addressed with the IETF Last Call feedback.
Minor:
-- Can you revisit the history -- why was RFC4187 inf
Hi!
I conducted my AD review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id-02. The document is
in good shape. I have largely editorial feedback below that can be handled
with IETF LC input.
(1) Section 1. Editorial. COMMENTs often come up in IESG review the it isn't
clear up front what exactly is being
Hi Alan!
Thanks for the quick response. Since these are minor, I already started the
IETF LC. Nevertheless, having an updated draft with these changes is even
better.
More inline ...
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan DeKok
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 5:12 PM
> To: R
Hi!
I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-09. Thanks for the work
on modernizing existing guidance to cover TLS 1.3.
Two high level things caught my attention:
** The abstract, introduction and title suggested to me that this document is
only about TLS 1.3+EAP. If I wasn't usi
Hello!
I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert-05. This document is in
good shape. Thanks for writing this practical guidance for operators and
implementers. I have minor feedback below that can be addressed concurrently
with IETF LC.
Section 3. Editorial. s/A certificate ch
Hi Barry!
> -Original Message-
> From: iesg On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 10:17 AM
> To: Mohit Sethi M
> Cc: draft-ietf-emu-eaptlsc...@ietf.org; emu@ietf.org; The IESG
> ; emu-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Emu] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-emu-ea
Hi Rob!
> -Original Message-
> From: iesg On Behalf Of Robert Wilton via Datatracker
> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 7:27 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-emu-eap-tl...@ietf.org; j...@salowey.net; emu-cha...@ietf.org;
> emu@ietf.org
> Subject: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-emu
Hi!
I performed an AD review on draft-ietf-emu-noob-03. Thanks for the work on
this document -- in particular for providing copious examples in the Appendix;
and co-developing this text with the implementations and the proofs.
** Section 3.2.3. Per "The OOB receiver MUST compare the received
Hi Tuomas!
Thanks for the inline explanation below and the new text in -04. This new
content addresses my feedback so I advanced the document to IETF LC.
Regards,
Roman
> -Original Message-
> From: Aura Tuomas
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 9:17 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw ;
Hi!
I performed a second AD review on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13. This time on -18.
Thank you to the authors, the responsible co-chair, and the WG for all of the
work to redesign the -13 protocol in response to the initial IESG review in
December 2020. My review feedback consists of my own mi
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-17: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-18: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
15 matches
Mail list logo
