wrote:
> Alan has issued -11 of draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis. He
> believes it covers all of the outstanding issues that needed to be
> resolved. We held up the WGLC until we could have our session at IETF
> 117. With post-117 changes incorporated, now's seems like t
I plan to implement.
On 17.08.23 21:11, Michael Richardson wrote:
wrote:
> Alan has issued -11 of draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis. He
> believes it covers all of the outstanding issues that needed to be
> resolved. We held up the WGLC until we could have our session at
wrote:
> Alan has issued -11 of draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis. He
> believes it covers all of the outstanding issues that needed to be
> resolved. We held up the WGLC until we could have our session at IETF
Some people might find this URL useful:
https://author-tools.iet
> Servers and peers MUST follow the guidance provided in
> [I-D.ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs] when creating the CSR-Attributes
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-06.html#name-alternative-use-of-csr-temp
( https://youtu.be/biGtfqj7zgM?t=1640 )
descr
On Aug 17, 2023, at 5:34 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-06.html#name-alternative-use-of-csr-temp
> ( https://youtu.be/biGtfqj7zgM?t=1640 )
>
> describes a new, simpler way to to CSR Attributes, basically with a
> fill-in-the-blank
On Aug 17, 2023, at 5:02 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Some people might find this URL useful:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=RFC7170&doc_2=draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis%2F
The diff is surprisingly good.
> Reading the document from top-to-bottom for the first time in awhile (to do
>
Alan DeKok wrote:
Alan> On Aug 17, 2023, at 5:34 PM, Michael Richardson
Alan> wrote:
>>
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-06.html#name-alternative-use-of-csr-temp
>> ( https://youtu.be/biGtfqj7zgM?t=1640 )
>>
>> describes a new, simpler wa
Alan DeKok wrote:
>> section 2; paragraph 2, uses SHOULD several times without obvious
>> exceptions. Could be it is MUST?
> I don't think we can mandate that the outer EAP identity is an NAI.
okay, then the exception for the SHOULD needs text.
>> Figure 2: should TLV Encaps
