Hi Alan,
Having given this a bit of thought, I think we are chasing our tails,
and no text is required. Let's look at two cases: expired credentials,
and credentials that have not yet expired.
Expired Credentials
Handling an expired credential occurs in one of several ways in enterprises:
On Aug 4, 2023, at 3:47 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Having given this a bit of thought, I think we are chasing our tails, and no
> text is required. Let's look at two cases: expired credentials, and
> credentials that have not yet expired.
I put some additional text in the draft I published yest
Ok, we might be having an Agree-O-thon...
On 04.08.23 11:49, Alan DeKok wrote:
Access policies are applied after provisioning has been done. So they are
entirely irrelevant until the server replies with an EAP Success.
Yes. So COAs and Disconnects aren't necessary at that point.
Hi David,
I have reviewed the proposed registration in draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs and it
seems ok to me.
In addition, I noticed one typo in the IANA considerations section (8).
The text:
This extension of EAP-AKA' shares its attribute space and subtypes
with Extensible Authentication Protocol Met
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 at 21:34, Alan DeKok wrote:
The diff is perhaps more interesting:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-09&url2=draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-10&difftype=--html
>
> * clarify terminology on inner / outer TLVs as per Eliot's suggestion
>
Two minor
I think this is okay. I'd like to just check the diagrams, but that
could happen as part of WGLC.
Eliot
On 03.08.23 20:34, Alan DeKok wrote:
The diff is perhaps more interesting:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-09&url2=draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-10&dif
Hi authors,
Please see below for comments from the expert (Vesa Lehtovirta).
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
-
I have reviewed the proposed registration in draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs and it
seems ok to me.
In addition, I noticed one typo in the IANA considerations section (8
On Aug 4, 2023, at 6:54 AM, Heikki Vatiainen wrote:
> Two minor suggestions:
> 1. Capitalise 'inner' in the section header
> 2. End the 'Inner TLVs' definition with '... but no Outer TLVs are used'.
> Here ' are used' is new text. That makes it symmetric with the previous
> sentence and doesn't
